Monday, May 29, 2023

How does American Democracy Handle an Internal Threat to its Existence?

 Dr Bill Leonard: They'll Know we are Christians by our What?

The fact that terminology defining Evangelicals and even the use of the term Christian is changing into something that it has never been before is the point of the linked article by Dr. Bill Leonard, who is professor emeritus at Wake Forest University Divinity School.  Leonard, a Baptist theologian, uses a Christian anthem from the Jesus movement days in the 60's to illustrate how American Christianity has changed.  The song, "They'll Know we are Christians by our Love," written by Peter Scholtes, a Catholic priest at St. Brendan's Church in Chicago, was based on John 13:35 where the words of Christ are recorded, "By this everyone will know you are my disciples, if you have love for one another."  

Contrast that with the words of speakers at Re-Awaken America events, where Trumpism meets Evangelicalism, somewhat anyway, who advocate for elimination of their enemies by violence and murder.  A quote from Tennessee pastor Greg Locke, recorded by an observer at a recent event, said, "We should use our second amendment rights  if the government won't respect our first amendment rights."  Roger Stone and Mike Flynn, both pardoned criminals, help push the theme of these rallies away from any Christian virtue, things that Jesus said like "love your enemy," and "turn the other cheek."  

These are not people who wait around for God to answer their prayers, since his answer might not be what they want to hear.  They choose to get their mission accomplished by the use of political power, to heck with God.  And yet, Christians who claim to believe in the inerrancy of the Bible will go along with some of this craziness without any idea of what the Bible says, or how to interpret it.  

Leonard says that in the public square, even the term "Christian" is changing inherent defititions.  People now associate the words "Evangelical" and "Christian" with White Christian Nationalism.  There's a leadership crisis occurring as sincere believers leave churches with pastors and leadership that pushes the nationalist theme and crowds out orthodox, Biblical faith.  Pastors have to decide whether they will continue to preach the gospel or cater to those who want to hear political doctrine.  Christian nationalism can't succeed unless it squelches biblical Christianity.  

White Christian Nationalism exists because religious liberty in this country lets it compete in the marketplace of ideas.  Most Christians, the vast majority of them, actually, are relatively ignorant about the principles and doctrines that make up their faith, and are easily convinced.  For people who proclaim belief in a Bible that is inerrant and infallible in its content, they are surprisingly easy to fool by twisting a few words around and abandoning the rest.  

Defeating it must happen at the ballot box.  And in order for that to occur, people who know better must vote.  The other way is information.  People who know better must also stand up to error being preached in their churches, and confront it with the truth.  I am encouraged by seeing the presence of an army of such error correcters show up on Twitter and in other parts of social media.  That's what we do here, too, so feel free to share this blog in a way that it reaches Christians who are falling into heresy and apostasy.  It's never easy to confront someone who is falling into bad ideology 

Leonard's point is "to reclaim Jesus from his chuch, his meaning that of those like fundamentalist Jason Graber, a pastor in Spokane, Washington who publicly advocates for executing LGBTQ persons and for "putting a bullet in the back of the head" of parents who would allow transgender surgery to be done on them and then string them up on a bridge so the public can see the consequences of this kind of behavior."  They'll know we are Christians, indeed.  And exactly how does that fulfill the mission and purpose of Christ's gospel or make the world a better place?  

We need to be bold and aggressive, when we are the majority and have control of the lawmaking apparatus, to do the right thing then.  We need to pass laws that last and then make sure we appoint justices that enforce them.  We should never again take the right to vote casually, and fail to show up for elections at all levels, even school boards and city councils.  Ask about every candidate's ideology.  Be the voice of reason.  

Leonard is probably the strongest advocate for traditional Baptist freedoms, and most particulary the separation of church and state, and has written some powerful books about it.  His point, that the church should be a redemptive presence without the aid or interference of state legislatures, Congress or the Supreme Court.  





Sunday, May 28, 2023

I Expected Too Much, and I was Disappointed

Without going into too much detail, today marked a decision in my life that I honestly never thought I'd make.  I'm a "give 'em the benefit of the doubt" kind of guy, and I gave too much trust away and got burned.  But I've seen some things in people that, if I'd been more careful, I wouldn't ever have trusted.  I did anyway, because of my background and being merciful and all of that.  But I've learned my lesson and today will be the last time I let myself be sold out by Evangelical Christians.  

Leaving means my livelihood is affected in a major way.  I'll have to figure out how to navigate the next year and a half until I can start collecting my social security benefits.  Even then, I'll have to work, but it will be better than working in the environment in which I am now.  I'm done.  I've been sold out, thrown under the bus to suit someone else's agenda.  No compassion, no consideration, no one coming to stand with me though they repeatedly offered to do such.  Nothing there that shows me there was any difference between them and the worldliness they condemn.   

Whatever faith I have is my own now anyway.  The political invasion of the church drove me to the edge a long time back and I've had to keep faithful on my own,   I've always been taught that people will let you down, even fellow Christians, but God is always God.  While the latter may be true, I am ending any association I have with the former.  Unless the Christianity of a friend resembles mine and judges no one else, I'm not hanging around.  

Yes, it is disappointing.  Something that you've lived with all your life becomes unreliable and untrustworthy, has political movtives and doesn't value either your opinion or your quality of life.  So today, it's over. 


Boebert Lives in a Glass House and Shouldn't Throw Stones

Boebert Calls for North Face Boycott Because of Drag Queen Endorsement 

Lauren Boebert's ignorance of the Christian faith shows up on multiple occasions.  Defending her son's out of wedlock pregnancy by saying she wasn't going to "nitpick the Bible" was followed by her announcement that she was seeking a divorce.  Neither one of those things fit very well in the overall worldview of her brand of Evangelical Christianity, but then, neither did her husband's indecent exposure prior to their marriage, nor does throwing a child around, as one of their sons alleged recently before recanting when his mother took control of the 911 call he was placing.  

So it should not be too surprising that the Colorado congresswoman stepped outside of the boundaries of her claimed faith, which is, by description of her action, not really Christian, to label other human beings as "degenerates" because of their sexuality.  That's a judgment that she's neither qualified nor permitted to render if she's claiming to be a Christian.  It's one thing to determine, for one's self, what standards, principles, values and virtues by which to live, based on a personal interpretation of the Bible and the gospel of Jesus Christ.  But it goes against the teaching of that same gospel to judge others unless the same standard is applied.  And the fact of the matter is that, in the Christian gospel, Lauren Boebert is also a degenerate.  So are we all.  

That is the whole crux of the Christian gospel, that Jesus Christ came to redeem degenerate humanity.  It is, in fact, not a message of condemnation at all, as John, the Apostle, says in his gospel, "Indeed, God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him."  John 3:17, NRSV  Original sin is a core doctrine of the Christian faith, the belief that humans are born in a state of sin that is separation from God, and are reunited and restored to him by a process of redemption that is the purpose fulfilled by Christ.  

Boebert's public reaction to her son's indiscretion was quite casual, though in the Christian faith, there's no difference between that and any other kind of sexual activity outside of marriage.  She's only interested in "nitpicking the Bible" when it scores political points for her.  But in this case, her hypocrisy has the potential to create a larger number of detractors than supporters.  Oh, and divorce, well, in the book of Matthew, 19:8, Jesus says that divorce for any cause other than marital unfaithfulness, is adultery which meets the definition of degenerate, I think. 

As a Christian myself, I believe that Jesus' definition of "marital unfaithfulness" is much broader than just a sexual relationship.  I think men who physically or mentally abuse their wives are just as unfaithful as the guy who has multiple affairs.  And I think a husband who abuses his children is also being unfaithful to his marriage and his family.  I don't know any of the details about Boebert's divorce, and the story that is linked to this one, about the 9-1-1 call her son placed, saying he was being thrown around by his father, may or may not be the reason for her filing for divorce.  But she has no room to call anyone else a degenerate.  

One of my favorite books, and it's still around and worth reading, is called If the Church Were Christian, by Phillip Gulley who is a Quaker minister.  The subtitle, "Rediscovering the values of Jesus," and it is, as a reviewer says, "profound wisdom on how to live in a world created by a loving, compassionate God."  One of the chapters carries the title, "If the church were Christian, gracious behavior would be more important than right belief."  To that I would add that gracious behavior is evidence of right belief.  If Christianity has conversion as one of its goals, classifying people as degenerate is not a good place to start achieving it. 

And yes, to those who want to bring it up, there is a difference between Hillary Clinton labelling Trump supporters as "deplorable" and Boebert calling the LGBTQ community "degenerate."  Clinton was referencing, and criticizing, the politics of Trump supporters, compared to traditional American political values, describing the white supremacy and conspiracy theories that drive most of them.  Boebert's accusation is a judgment of character.  Frankly, when it comes to acceptance and community, most LGBTQ persons are much more open than many Christians.  Some of them are Christians, too, and their spiritual condition is between them and God and not subject to any other human judgment. 

Boebert is providing a very good illustration of why the founding fathers thought that it was wise to separate faith, which is a matter of personal, individual conscience, from the civil authority of the state. 





Sunday, May 21, 2023

Indictments of Trump Must Come or Confidence in the Ability of Government to Enforce Laws Will Drop Significantly

That's a long title for an article, but it says, in a nutshell, exactly what needs to happen, and relatively soon.  We do not have the luxury of conducting long investigations which leave potential criminals on the streets.  In this case, we are talking about a criminal politician, not the first in American history, but arguably the worst, who is putting together a campaign to run for office again, with the openly clear intention of using that office for his own personal gain and protection.  That's a slap in the face to our justice system and to the rule of law.  It makes it seem as if the latter only applies to people who are not wealthy or influential enough to buy their way out of the system.  

Is that the image we want people to have?  That undermines the credibility of the constitution and our system of laws and justice.  

Trump has flaunted the law all his life, and he has gotten away with it.  Long before he decided to run for President, he was engaged in business fraud, tax evasion and fraud, had multiple defaults on debt, and was known as a manipulator of the law for his own benefit.  He knew, instinctively almost, that a very wealthy person with a big mouth could gather enough political influence to avoid accountability, expand his fortune and make himself wealthier at someone else's expense.  He openly called those who were honest in business, who followed the law and paid their fair share of taxes "suckers."  

That was followed up by his four year Presidency, a historic disaster of epic proportions in virtually every way.  He added to the crimes he committed by running his campaign like a criminal enterprise, a mountain of collusion with the Russian government, documented in the Mueller Report from which I, and millions of other Americans, expected indictments to come, knowing that the DOJ under Attorney General Barr was nothing more than another way for Trump to avoid having to pay for legal services.  And no, I didn't believe Barr would do the right thing.  That was my expectation, not my belief or connection to reality.  And of course, he didn't.

And that disappointment is one reason why the DOJ can't let this opportunity slip by on a technicality or in political ignorance.  There's a mountain of evidence underneath what has already been confirmed by the media regarding the former President's criminal activity related to January 6th.  What we know proves seditious conspiracy, at least, if media reports are accurate it does.  And if there's more evidence, fine, but this has to be put together, indictments served and trials started long before Christmas to get it done in time so that it avoids being moot because of circumstances.  

The same holds true with the documents case.  If what's been reported in the media, on the surface of that case, is accurate, then the evidence in the hands of those who will prosecute the case must be pretty damning, because what we already know about it is damning.  

Who Gets to Prosecute First? 

News has come out of Georgia that Trump is likely to be indicted there in August.  He's already been indicted in Manhattan, and already been convicted in the civil trial involving E. Jean Carroll.  Clearly, there's no strategy or plan or coordination between the various courts and jurisdictions when it comes to their prosecutions.  Figuring out how to navigate through all of that, along with what the DOJ is doing, is likely creating gigantic legal bills and a clear crisis for the Trump legal team, which appears to be losing personnel over this exact scenario.  

In the long run, it doesn't matter who gets a conviction first.  What matters is that all of the potential convictions are secured well before the 2024 election.  Do we trust that those in charge of the cases all know that and are aiming for that goal?  There is absolutely nothing wrong with considering the potential political consequences of letting this danger get close to an election and deciding to use the power of the office to get done what needs to be done in order to prevent a national catastrophe.  

One of the concerns I have is that some left-leaning media, and some Democrats, are actually talking about the fact that if 2024 is a race between Biden and Trump, that may be the best scenario for Biden to win.  I think all of the political indications at the present time point to Biden being able to pull off a bigger win, adding a few more states to his electoral total, than 2020.  But if justice is to prevail, and if we are to be able to live up to the claim that we are a nation of laws, and that all are equal under law, Trump must be indicted, tried, convicted and ruled ineligible for public office before he wins the GOP nomination.  

It has to happen that way for the sake of justice and the rule of law.  

This is why I Supported Biden in the Primary 

The Democrats have put a lot of excellent candidates up for the Presidential nomination for several cycles now.  I could have easily supported any of them in either 2016 or 2020, and no one was more disappointed than I was when Hillary lost in 2016.  What tipped the balance for me, in 2020, was Biden's experience, and his addressing the issue of Trump's prior criminality, and his claims of immunity as President, supported by his corrupt Attorney General Bill Barr, even before January 6th and the document scandal.  He was much more clear on this than any of the others, except, perhaps Amy Klobuchar, but in addition to his words, there is his long experience in Washington, and that gives him an advantage in choosing the kind of people to run the DOJ who will get the job done.  

And this is still my expectation.  I have no doubt President Biden knows what is at stake.  So does just about every other Democrat in the House and Senate.  But I also know that there is political positioning and maneuvering involved, it would be naive not to consider that.  This is a democracy and the people have a voice.  And this voice is one that is encouraging those engaged in this job to get it done and do what you promised us you would do when we voted for you.  

The American people responded to the corruption and incompetence of the former President's administration and term in office by exercising their power and putting someone else in office.  We did that in response to what he had done at the time, not knowing that in his last few months in office, it would get so much more corrupt and so much worse.  This American is joining his voice to millions of others asking that this be done quickly and effectively, as we believe the evidence shows that it can be.  


  


Saturday, May 20, 2023

The Re-Awaken America Tour Exposes the Heresy of Some Evangelicals

 No, Michael Flynn, You are WRONG!

For a political faction that claims support rooted in Evangelical Christianity, the doctrine and theology that they pass off as "Christianity" in their "Re-Awaken America" rallies, featuring former general Michael Flynn, a pardoned criminal, meets the definition of heretical apostasy.  They have picked up on the sensationalism that is exhibited in some of the more extreme corners of Christianity, such as that of Trump's "spiritual advisor," prosperity cultist Paula White, and have claimed the authority to change the interpretation of the Biblical text to suit their politics.  They count on the pathetic ignorance of their base, made up of people who have no idea what the Christian faith teaches, to believe what they say, give them money to continue and at some point, cast their ballot for Trump and his endorsed and approved candidates. 

When I say that this meets the definition of heretical apostasy, I am using the conservative, Evangelical method of interpreting the Bible and establishing what they consider to be doctrinal and theological orthodoxy.  Most conservative Evangelicals are absolutely locked into a set of beliefs that are based on a very literal rendering of the words in the Bible.  

Some fall into the category of "fundamentalists," in that they insist that belief in a specific set of fundamental doctrines is necessary for any kind of genuine redemptive, conversion experience to happen, and for a person to demonstrate their continued faithfulness.  Others, while not that insistent on absolute conformity, still don't permit much deviation from "essential" doctrines and have very well defined theological systems.  Within their various denominations and fellowship groups, there is little room for dissention, and no dissention allowed on certain issues.  One of the more conservative Evangelical denominations, the Southern Baptist Convention, is on the verge of codifying rules that exclude churches which place women in any role that uses the term "pastor" to describe the job.  

The rhetoric that they use in their criticism of Christians who don't get in line with their dictated doctrinal conformity is caustic and hostile, especially when they are criticizing those within their ranks who dare to dissent.  And while most of what happens in this regard is about who is in control and who has the power, and isn't really all that much about keeping doctrine and theology "pure," it is the example they set, and the perspective they want the rest of the world to see.  

But When it Comes to Trump, and Anything MAGA....

A sixth grader with a decent record of attending Sunday School could point out where the teachings of the gospel of Jesus Christ and what passes for religion on the Re-Awaken America tour, or in the Turning Point rallies that the MAGA party conducts on Trump's behalf.  Trump's apologists among conservative Evangelicals have tried to make every excuse they can think of, from claiming that their religious standards don't necessarily have to apply to the political leaders they choose (even though those leaders based their appeal for the votes of Evangelicals on their philosophical and religious "compatibility") to actually claiming that Trump is one of them.   His CNN Town Hall defense of sexual abuse as normal male behavior and his claim that there isn't anything wrong with what Evangelicals define as "debauchery, fornication and sexual immorality" was a hard blow to their claims.  

And of course their response to this very public statement that Donald Trump is not a Christian, has no intention of becoming one, and doesn't have any respect for what they believe or practice is silence, ignoring it as if it doesn't exist.  Actually, there was some reaction to the town hall, as there has also been in some corners of the conservative Christian media, and to some of what has come from Michael Flynn on the Re-Awaken America tour.  Fox News falling apart and the dismissal of Tucker Carlson has allowed some truth to seep in.  I doubt that it will make a lot of difference, since I am becoming more convinced that most conservative Christians don't really know what their churches preach and teach and don't really care all that much.  It sounds cliche, but they use their Christian faith as a crutch or a convenience or a way to get ahead when they think they might need it.  

The simplistic faith practice of Evangelicals can't support the stress of trying to justify voting for a corrupt, worldly politician with an agenda that contains a few bones he's thrown their way but otherwise is a philosophical and spiritual quagmire, and trying to hold to a set of doctrinal statements they consider essential to the faith, but which are completely contradictory to Trumpism.  So it has taken words like Flynn's, or like those of Don Jr., who told Turning Point participants that the teachings of Jesus on turning the other cheek and loving your enemies wasn't getting them anywhere, and turned them into their own theology.  They are, in effect, burning the Bible they once claimed was inerrant and infallible and throwing Jesus under the bus. 

The Re-Awaken America Tour and White, Christian Nationalism is MAGA Religion and Modern Day Heresy 

In a very short, but direct and to the point epistle, the early Christian apostle Jude warned the Christian church against heresy that was already "intruding"--his word--into churches.  Jude's epistle is remarkable in its prophetic description of exactly what is happening among Evangelicals in America.  Trump is an intruder into their ranks, bringing in a licentiousness that many Christians either ignore in order to embrace his politics, or welcome and tolerate because of them.  Jude describes the intruders in the ancient church as if he had actually met Donald Trump, as a "grumbler, malcontent, indulging in his own lusts, bombastic in speech, flattering people to their own advantage (Jude v.16).  

I particularly like Jude's calling these intruders "waterless clouds," or "autumn trees without fruit."  It makes it sound like he knew the modern day MAGA crew and these tour speakers personally. 

There are plenty of American Christians, including quite a few Evangelicals and Catholics, who are deeply opposed to this use of their faith for political gain, and to the complete misrepresentation, distortion, and sometimes outright denial, of orthodox Biblical Christianity to support heretical and apostate MAGA religion.  It is impossible to reconcile what passes for religion from these tours with the kind of Evangelical Christianity that comes from a literal interpretation of scripture and belief that the Bible is inerrant and infallible. 

The only benefit I see in this for American Christians is that it is separating the sheep from the goats. Churches are finding out who the true Christians are and who are the intruders with the false gospel of licentiousness.  


  
























































  




Wednesday, May 17, 2023

Kari Lake Gets One More Chance to Look Like an Idiot

Kari Lake Gets One More Chance to Look Like an Idiot

Arizona taxpayers have had to shell out an awful lot of money because of failed GOP candidates in the state, over the past two election cycles.  Don't ever let your Republican candidates tell you they are interested in cutting spending.  None of them are interested in it, and Lake seems to be doing more than her fair share to spend taxpayer dollars frivolously.  Judges at several court levels have told her she doesn't have the evidence, and they're not going to overturn the election or even subtract ballots.  But she keeps coming back, finding someone in a very conservative court system who opens the door to spend even more taxpayer dollars on futility. 

She knows this.  This isn't about getting the election overturned, it's an ongoing campaign for office, keeping her name and face in an obliging media, almost deliberately looking insane and unbalanced, because that's what gets her the attention she's seeking.  She is continuing to run for office, more than likely Kyrsten Sinema's senate seat, but if she keeps challenging election results at every turn, she looks more and more like Trump, which is obviously what she wants.  

So the taxpayers of Arizona must foot the bill for the legal costs involved as yet another judge, this time from the extremist Supreme Court in the state, says, "give her another chance."  Or, "give her enough rope to hang herself."  She's been told, several times, what the legal standards are that she must meet in order for any ruling to go in her favor, and all the evidence they have, which has been gone over in several courts, where it has been made clear that there were no illegalities committed, and no irregularities that were not resolved in the final tally.  Every court conclusion has been the same, that she lost by just over 17,000 votes.  But Arizona taxpayers have to pay more to hear the same thing again.  I hope many of them remember how wasteful she was if she ever does get her name on a ballot again.  

Arizona Already has a Bad Election-denying Reputation and it Came at a Huge Cost

If you remember correctly, Arizona is the state where then-senate president Karen Fann, an election denying conspiracy theorist, pushed for the state to violate its own policy, and after authentic, certified audits showed zero evidence of voter fraud, instead of coming to grips with reality, pushed the senate to hire the "Cyber Ninjas," a false-front business aimed at bilking the state, and Republican contributors, out of millions of dollars.  It succeeded in doing that, and then still went bankrupt.  It failed to produce any meaningful information of any kind, though through a fog of ineptitude and fraud, wound up inadvertently admitting to being unable to find any evidence of voter fraud in Maricopa County's 2020 election count.  

There were a couple of benefits that came out of their waste of time.  Karen Fann felt increasing pressure from constituents and, deciding to avoid humiliation in her own party's primary, stepped down from her seat and didn't run in 2022.  She is currently under FBI investigation for her role in the January 6th Trump insurrection, related to the choosing of a slate of fake electors from Arizona and the production of a fraudulent electoral ballot. 

Fann's pushing of the Cyber Ninja audit cost the state far more than the money they had appropriated to pay for it.  The cost ran upwards of $6 million, including an unknown amount of tax dollars far over-running the budgeted amount, along with an expense of over $3 million to Maricopa County taxpayers for costs to replace voting machines that the phony auditing crew damaged or compromised during their "audit."  

So what we are seeing from Lake is more expense of tax dollars on frivolous, unprovable claims lacking any substantiating evidence, based solely on conspiracy theories and on someone's imagination.  Scatter-shot accusations triggering audits or recounts or thousands of dollars of legal fees and tying up court judges has a high price.  Lake isn't going to make her case.  It's time for Arizona taxpayers to stop funding her de-facto campaign.  And if she does run for something in 2024, send her home.  

And This Tells Arizona Voters Something About the Justices on Their Supreme Court and in Their Court System

Something is wrong with a court system that perpetuates false claims and allows cases to go forward without meeting any standard of evidence.  This is not a matter of making sure justice is done, it is playing the odds, hoping that somewhere along the line, a judge will ignore the law and the lack of evidence and use the power of the bench to interfere in an election without cause or reason.  That's clearly what Trump hoped when he went from court to court with his fraudulent, false claims in 2020, and it's obviously what Lake is trying to do with this election.   

Arizona voters need to wake up and see this for what it is.  When a politician is depending on a corrupt judiciary to get what they want, it's time to use your vote to make a change.  Kari Lake had nothing to offer to the people of Arizona, and they made their choice.  If she, or more accurately her campaign, isn't going to pay back the millions of dollars they've cost the people of Arizona, then those people should send an even clearer message through the ballot box in 2024, and make her pay that way.

 


Sunday, May 14, 2023

Some Christians and Catholics are "Tired of Liberal Ideology." But Exactly how has that Harmed Them?

Tired of Liberal Ideology, Putin Proposes a Village for "tired" Americans Outside Moscow 

When I read this piece, the first thing that popped into my head was how absolutely ignorant someone would have to be to decide that living in Russia, under what would be an Orthodox church dictatorship, could possibly be better than living in the United States and enjoying complete, constitutionally guaranteed freedom.  Anyone who would even think about doing this would have to be brainwashed, or radicalized, which is the ideological term in use these days.  

Or they would have to be so incredibly selfish and so twisted in their values, especially in their respect for other human beings, to be willing to live in a place where it takes government authority to keep people in line. 

One of our great, early Presidents and founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, once said: 

"The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subjects to the coercion of the laws.  But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them.  The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit.  We are answerable for them to our God.  The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as injurious to others.  But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god.  It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."  Notes on the State of Virginia, 1792

Who, in this country, has had their personal freedom of conscience diminished in any way by the free exercise of anyone else's rights?  How is it that people can get "tired" of ideology to which they do not subscribe themselves, and which they are not compelled or coerced into accepting?  And are these people so bottomless in their naivete', stupidity and selfishness that they aren't sensitive enough to understand that there might be people who are sick and tired of conservative ideology, which does advocate imposing itself on others, unlike liberal ideology?

Religious Extremism is Part of the Problem 

There's a lot of Christian nationalism wrapped up in these complaints about liberal ideology.  There's a lot of "Anglo-Israelism," which is the literal application of the Old Testament covenant relationship between God and the Jewish nation, in the religious extremism that forms the foundation of heretical Christian nationalism.  That leads to the belief that God will judge this nation for its collective sin in the same way that he judged the Jewish nation for its collective sin under the Old Testament covenant.  So, they blame those whom they see as responsible for America's collective sins.  

The New Testament narrative goes to great lengths to make it very clear that the end of the old covenant began with the birth of Jesus Christ, and ended rather dramatically with his crucifixion and resurrection.  Jesus is recorded as having given a prophecy, found in the latter chapters of Matthew, known as his "Eschatological Discourse," in which he predicts the destruction of the Jerusalem temple as the sign of the "end of the age."  His own gospel, which involves an individual covenant relationship between God and humans, a "spiritual kingdom" proclaimed by Jesus, is not specific to any race or ethnicity.  There is no offer of a covenant relationship with any nation, and no blessings given to nations as a result of anything associated with Christianity.  There is no such thing as a "Christian nation." 

Christian nationalism, and its variants, which include a healthy dose of white supremacy that pulls from the "chosen people" theme of the Old Testament, has so thoroughly intruded into and influenced American Christianity, including the Catholic church, that the accompanying intolerance of ideas considered to be incompatible with faith, or with their own specific brand of the faith, is not uncommon and is very likely behind the idea of extremists being "tired of liberal ideology."  

So that's an explanation of the problem.  But that still doesn't explain how it is that the rights of those who are tired of it have been affected or how their civil liberties are somehow diminished because liberal ideology is protected as a matter of free conscience by the Constitution of the United States.  In the words of Jefferson, there's no evidence that anyone's "pocket has been picked," or anyone's "leg has been broken."  

All I see in these complaints is inexcusable intolerance.  And that, in the Christian gospel, is sinful. 

An Overly Prosperous, Uneducated Population That Takes Far Too Much for Granted

The selfishness and ignorance that has combined to produce this intolerance seems to be getting more prevalent in American society as time goes on.  There are "media prophets" who figure out how to exploit what many Americans just don't know about their government and how it works, and who create and deliberately intensify conflict between social, political and economic ideologies in order to make money for themselves.  Rush Limbaugh established the model for this, and left a whole train of wannabees in his wake, including the likes of Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and other small-fry, local market whiners who echo the same themes, deliberately keeping people uninformed, pushing outright lies, playing to bias and prejudice and inciting emotional responses, specifically anger, in order to keep their ratings up and the advertising dollars rolling into their pockets.  

I've said, for a long time, that when it comes to Civics and history education in our schools, we have failed to live up to the expectation of providing a sufficiently educated electorate which is the key to preservation of a democracy.  We've also failed to overcome our long history of racist discrimination and bigotry.  It's those in the predominant racial, social and religious majorities that are in favor of autocracy, and who desire to live under autocratic rule, because they benefit from it.  But that's not the America our founders envisioned, or that we, the people, built and want to see prosper.

And if this is the doctrine and theology that dominates the religious right, then a large swath of American Christianity is wallowing in heresy, and many churches are showing evidence of apostasy.  The Apostle Jude was quite prophetic when he was describing intruders in the church in the first century in which he was writing.  He called them out as "ungodly perverts who turn the grace of God into licentiousness," compared them to the ungodliness of Sodom and Gomorrah, and called them "blemishes on your love feasts, waterless clouds, autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, uprooted."  

He could be describing exactly what is happening among the more extreme religious political right. 

"These are grumblers and malcontents, they indulge their own lusts, they are bombastic in speech, flattering people to their own advantage.  V. 16

We Are Tired of Conservative Ideology.  But It Neither "Picks our Pocket" nor "Breaks our Legs" 

If given a choice, most liberals, certainly not all but I won't paint with a broad brush, would not choose to go to some kind of ideological or political enclave as expatriate Americans living elsewhere in the world.  We understand how democracy works.  We ourselves have endured the control and rule of the Republican Party at various times, many of us must endure some of the most ridiculous aspects of the loss of our freedom because we, as a people, have failed to hold politicians accountable to enforce laws, like those against gerrymandering, and must then put up with state legislatures that lose their minds and create autocracies within states.  

So we put up with it, bide our time, come around to realizing that we have to vote all the time, and on occasion, elect politicians who undo conservative fascism.  We understand how our democracy works and we would not trade the freedom we have for anything, we would rather put up with adversity and fight back, use the courts if we have to, and spend our resources protecting individual rights and freedom, thank you, than we would developing hatred for those who think differently but are entitled to the same rights and freedom, regardless of whether they acknowledge it or not.  

And I will speak for myself, but I certainly would never leave this country to live in another, because too many people here have too many rights to live as they please.  







Friday, May 12, 2023

Town Hall Reveals Trump as a "Political Mirage"

 Taegan Goddard's Political Wire said that Biden's team was "positively giddy" after Trump's appearance at a town hall on CNN.  They had good reason to be.  According to Goddard's post, one of Biden's team members said, "It was quite efficient.  Weeks worth of damning content in one hour."  

And that just about sums it up.  I thought Trump did an excellent job, if the man is capable of doing anything excellent, letting voters know exactly why he is the single most incompetent, unqualified, unfit individual in the entire nation, including all of the other 300 million plus of us, to serve as President.  He is a loser.  And during that town hall, he opened up his mouth and let everyone know that he is.  

It was grueling to watch.  Aside from the hole-shaped mouth that moves strangely when he speaks, his voice, his eyes which, even on camera give away the fact that he is lying through his teeth, his accent, his limited vocabulary in which "disgrace" seems to be the only adjective he knows, it is impossible to take the man seriously.  I watched to assure myself that this pitiful excuse for a human being can't win an election and isn't convincing when he opens his mouth.  I know in my head that he is out of touch with the majority of the American people, just looking at the majority of his followers is enough to see that.  But this was an unprecedented performance worthy of a third rate cable network with fourth rate journalists, and it was very assuring, in the ridiculousness of his performance, that he isn't capable of winning an election legitimately and fairly, when people's votes count.  

He's a mirage, a fake, a television personality with no substance, a living creature devoid of morality or conscience, a shell of a human being angry at a world he can't control.  

According to Political Wire, Trump missed the expressed will of the voters on every single issue he addressed.  A recent YouGov poll shows that 67% of Americans want Ukraine to prevail, but Trump wouldn't commit to that.  Quinnipiac conducted a poll in which 80% of Americans--a significantly huge percentage considering American politics these days--think Vladimir Putin is a war criminal, but Trump wants to side with his good friend, Vlad.  While one of Trump's goals to get into office is to overturn the rule of law, and create chaos by pardoning people who were arrested and convicted for their disloyalty to this country on January 6th, 68% of Americans say those people should not be pardoned under any circumstance.  

He's on the losing side when it comes to Roe v. Wade and abortion, his perspective being opposed by 61% of Americans.  And while 58% of Americans are opposed to defaulting on the debt, saying that would be irresponsible, Trump is in favor of doing it.  Of course he is.  That's why he's rich.  He defaulted on his debts, multiple times.  That's also why he's a loser. 

A Political Mirage

The desperation of the Republican party in the wake of two full terms of Barak Obama, America's first black President whose administration was absolutely nothing like the racially biased predictions in the imagination of Republicans who tried to scare people into thinking that this was some kind of race war "takeover," the fulfillment of ludicrous "replacement" theory, was bottomless.  In the field of announced candidates, there was not a single Republican who could make themselves look presidential.  The supposed front runner, Jeb Bush, did a pitiful job of campaigning, staking his campaign on his last name, forgetting that his brother had left office with some of the most spectacularly low job approval ratings in decades.  

So, in the scramble for prominence, as the favor moved almost weekly from one guy to the next, Trump bided his time.  When he came close to the top, according to the Mueller report, the Russian money and influence kicked in and gave him a downhill run to the party's nomination.  A full on 70% of Republicans were opposed to him almost right up to the time he became the nominee.  But in their tilted system, its the party influence that dictates who gets the nomination.  

Even with the full support of the GOP, as its nominee, Trump never achieved the favor of even half of the voters at any time.  He was a political mirage, a campaigner so inept, and so prone to make idiotic and nonsensical remarks that he went through three campaign managers and hundreds of staffers while he was running.  Some of the best strategists that the GOP had were booted out the door by his angry outbursts at hearing the truth.  The one element of American politics that allows weak and inept candidates a real shot at the White House, the electoral college, was the political quirk that got him into the White House.  He could not overtake Hillary Clinton's popular vote. 

When 2020 came around, his time in office doomed him.  A lot of the pundits say that his incompetence in handling the COVID pandemic was the worst political management they'd ever seen.  But in all honesty, everything from his foreign policy to his corporate tax cuts undermined his voting support with the independent and moderate voters he needed to win.  The bottom line was that he didn't have the personality, the skill, the educational background, experience, knowledge or wisdom to handle the Presidency of the United States.  He failed and the voters gleefully pushed him out.  

It's easy to see why.  There's nothing there.  He doesn't understand politics or government.   He is a dysfunctional human being, sociopathic in his inability to handle diversity, pathologic in his inability to tell the truth, and is unable to negotiate, in spite of his claims to being an expert "deal maker."  He's a moral degenerate, something I hope many of the Evangelical Christians I know who try to convince me that he's changed and he's become one of them saw in that town hall last night.  What does it say about the man when he knows what his Evangelical supporters believe, but goes ahead and flaunts his worldliness and immorality and makes excuses for it right in their face?  It says more about them, and their lack of conviction or common sense or critical thinking skills, when they continue to support him.  

Trump and his ideology are a political mirage.  

Setting Democrats up for the 2024 Win

From the beginning of his Presidency, Joe Biden has gone after Trump's brand.  Well, why not?  He won the Presidency doing that.  If not for the quirk of the Electoral College, eight million votes difference in this political climate is quite a significant difference.  It will be more than that, if it turns out to be the same race in 2024.  

The Democrats really have the issues lined up for them.  Trump is at odds with the majority of voters on every major political issue.  Depending on what happens with the DOJ and his potential indictments, his running for the Republican nomination could be disrupted.  But it's going to cost him a lot of votes if those indictments come out and trials are proceeding during the campaign.  The only thing I can see that might hurt Biden is the DOJ not returning indictments against Trump prior to the election.  That will cost Democrats voters, quite a few, I think.

We know what's at stake, and I think a clear majority of the American people know too.  We cannot afford any more apathy from voters, especially in red states.  Too many people don't go, because they don't think their candidates can win in their state or district.  Frankly, in most places in this country, the number of unregistered adults is larger than the margins of victory for most candidates.  And those people tend to be apathetic because they think their vote won't matter.  That doesn't mean that Democrats would win every election if those people just turned out.  

I'm just one person.  I'm not bragging or patting myself on the back here, either.  But let me tell you what I am doing to help make this work.  It's not that hard and most people can do this without any problem at all.  

First, I have committed a regular, monthly contribution to the Biden-Harris campaign.  It's $25 a month, not a fortune by any means.  But it is affordable for me and down the stretch, because I live in an area where my state legislators and my congressman and senators don't really need a lot of financial help, I can give my over and above amounts to candidates like Ruben Gallego in Arizona, running for Sinema's senate seat.  

Second, I write here and promote this blog as much as possible.  I've seen the numbers grow, and I know most of the readers share similar political opinions and perspectives.  I also know there are some people who read and occasionally respond with a comment or, more likely an email, asking for more information or clarity, because they are thinking about what they've read.  I get a few enraged rants, not surprising, but satisfying because if it is getting under the skin of some Trumpie extremists, they're thinking about it.  

Third, I have mapped out every election that will take place in my area between now and the 2024 Presidential election, and I plan to vote in every one of them.  If there's an open forum or a place to ask questions, I will ask every candidate if they support Trump and if they believe the 2020 election was stolen.  If their answer is yes, then my answer is "no".  

Fourth, I will identify places nearby, usually in neighboring states, where I can go help the Democrats running for office.  I went to Wisconsin this past fall to volunteer for Mandela Barnes, and after the votes were counted, it was satisfying to note that the county where I went to volunteer saw a 3% increase in Democratic votes over the previous senate election.  There were a lot of volunteers, we made a lot of phone calls and had a good time knocking on a lot of doors.  

In spite of what I think should be happening, I think Democrats need to be more prepared than ever, get more cash than ever, and launch an unprecedented political assault, against their opponents, in order to ensure the safety of our democracy and to permanently retire this fascist, immoral, inhumane, demented demagogue from American politics permanently.




Thursday, May 11, 2023

So What Were Anti-Abortion Activists Doing to Stop Abortion Other Than Fighting Against Roe v. Wade?

The passion and intensity that anti-abortion supporters bring to this political issue doesn't match the effort they put into figuring out how other ways of getting the numbers down besides just prosecuting it as a crime.  That may prevent some abortions, though it is more likely to drive them underground, where the risks of complications are much greater and the problems that caused the issue in the first place are made much worse.  

The belief that life begins at conception is an almost exclusively religious belief.  As such, the argument that laws restricting access to abortion are a violation of the Constitution's establishment clause form the basis of the rationale behind abortion rights.  It is not a violation of any religious person's conscience if a person who doesn't believe the religious principle about when life begins decides to terminate a pregnancy.  On the other hand, forcing someone who doesn't believe life begins at conception to carry a pregnancy to full term based on religious convictions they do not practice or believe in does violate their conscience and their right to decide on their own.  

Fixing the Root Problem 

Every abortion has a root problem and a set of circumstances, from lack of education which limits the scope of one's ability to understand their choices, to mental illness or dysfunction, to the biggest root cause, statistically, which is poverty.  During all the years of Roe v. Wade, there was not one thing preventing any religious denomination, organization or local church from providing the kind of ministry necessary for those women who feel their back is up against a wall and they have no other choice, to have some space and breathing room as they decide what they are going to do.  

Conservative Christians will point to a scattering of denominationally operated social service entities as evidence they've been "doing something" about abortion besides just whining about its legality.  The scope of these entities, which include crisis pregnancy centers that offer an ultrasound scan and a lecture that is a more of a guilt trip than counseling, a scattering of social service agencies that work with mothers interested in putting their children up for adoption and finding prospective parents to adopt, and a few other places that actually provide food, shelter and clothing, along with access to pre-natal care, counseling and job training, is to help some women have a choice they might not otherwise have.  

Aside from the crisis pregnancy centers, many of which are just coercive and offer minimal real help, there's a lot of good being done by these agencies, some operated by churches, denominations or Christian groups, some operated independently of religious motivation or support.  They offer both choices and opportunities, and many of them address the core issues which prevent many women from considering any other option except abortion.  They actually help women deal with root causes, including providing education and training in essential areas where it is missing, a secure refuge during the pregnancy where women can feel safe and have time to decide how to move forward, and help for whatever steps they take in doing so.  

But, if the people who believe that life begins at conception, devoted the time, energy and resources they put into politics to these kinds of ministries and organizations, and if they really were as serious and committed to the issue, beyond the right wing political implications, there should be hundreds of places like that, accessible from just about anywhere in the country, fully funded and helping thousands of women who need it.  If they were serious, they'd put their money where their mouth is.  And yes, I had to say that, because that's the issue.  If someone is passionate enough to throw political slurs and name-call politicians who support abortion rights "baby killers," then I'd think they'd use their influence as a member of their church to forego a $10 million sanctuary that gets used once or twice a week for church services in favor of setting up a center that has the potential to prevent a thousand abortions.  

If they're that passionate about the issue, then they'd avoid spending $60,000 on their own selfish desires for a gas-guzzling SUV and give part of that money to a center that helps women get to a point where they feel comfortable and able to support their infant.  Or a place where they can live and work and get health care until the baby is born, and then, if they choose, put it up for adoption.  

A For-Profit Business

One particular social service agency that I've encountered in that business, in Texas, operated and funded by a Christian denomination, processes adoptions.  They have some women who live in two or three group homes scattered around the state, for pregnant women who were considering an abortion and got talked into giving up their child for adoption.  I'm not sure what their capacity is, or exactly what they provide, but in order to get into the group home, women have to agree to give up their child for adoption.  

The cost of the adoption, to prospective families, runs into the thousands of dollars, including lawyer's fees and a fee the agency charges which is applied to the housing and care of the prospective mothers.  Yes, they charge prospective adoptive families for the mother's room and board.  The agency also gets a fee for facilitating the adoption that reimburses them for any legal costs.  So a social service agency that is pointed out as an example of what conservatives are doing to deal with abortion's root causes isn't out any of its contributed budget cash to provide the service.  As a multi-million dollar a year budget operation, its adoption services probably save the lives of about 25 unborn children each year.  

And that's one of just a small handful of similar agencies in Texas dedicated to this purpose.  How can these people's anti-abortion position be taken seriously when that's all they are willing to do?  If they are really serious about ending abortion, why aren't they doing it?  What's stopping them?  

Credit Where Credit is Due

I have seen some sincere, dedicated people who see the needs and commit their resources to making a difference.  They operate on the belief that many women who choose abortion would welcome an opportunity to choose an alternative if their circumstances permitted.  Because the fact of the matter is that few women have full control over the circumstances leading up to their decision.  We forget that there must also be a man involved.  What's he doing?  

Just off one of the main drags, in a gritty, North Philadelphia neighborhood, there's a small congregation of about 100 mostly African-American, Latino and Asian members who worship in a building left behind by another church years ago.  They worship in the church auditorium.  Over a five year period of time, with mostly volunteer labor, they renovated the building next door which had some classrooms, a dining area and office space, into a community center.  They distribute food and clothing.  Once a week, a doctor volunteers time to see patients.  They got a counselor to volunteer time.  

Then the owner of an abandoned row house next door gave the church the deed to the property.  It took several years, with the help of volunteer groups, sometimes one day at a time, sometimes a week at a time, to get the house in order.  Initially intended as a women's shelter, it became a refuge for women who were pregnant and homeless.  Other churches have stepped in to help now, but initially, this small congregation took care of up to eight women at a time, providing shelter, meals, clothing, medical care and counseling help.  Ironically, their work isn't motivated by a political perspective on abortion.  It's there to meet a need.  

A Political Football

The problem with the religious right's lack of concern with any aspect of the abortion issue except trying to control it by making it criminal, is that it involves a disproportionate percentage of women of color, and women who are poor.  Helping out with voluntary resources means dealing with women who may not share the Christian value of sexual abstinence until marriage.  So criminalizing abortion is a way to compel or coerce behavior related to religious values.  

If conservative Christians believed that their faith was the answer to all of the world's problems, then it would be reasonable to assume that winning converts to a redemptive faith experience based on forgiveness and grace offered by a God who the Apostle John defines as Love would be an effective way to change behavior, resulting in fewer abortions.  Christian conversion, according to the early church's apostles, writing in the New Testament, comes by spiritual conviction, not legal coercion.  It's hard for people to experience conviction leading to a conversion experience into a legalistic, rule-driven, coercive kind of faith.  Perhaps if more churches got back to the business of preaching the Christian gospel, instead of extreme right wing politics, they would be more successful at evangelism than they currently experience.  

I read somewhere that the current debt load carried by American churches on buildings that most of them use for just a few hours a week is somewhere in the neighborhood of $5 billion.  So what that means is that a good share of offerings in the plate every Sunday go to pay interest on the debt.  No wonder they're having trouble winning converts, and doing ministry.  Maybe that's why some of them are turning to politics to do their work for them.  

A Personal Note

I believe that many abortions could be avoided by resolving societal problems that include poverty, lack of education and presence of ignorance, moral issues that include a lack of respect for humanity, mental illness, even crime.  If Christians believe that the gospel of Jesus Christ is the remedy for those problems, then their efforts need to match their claims.  Christianity is a faith, and it is a faith that loses its character, its message, and its ability to bring about redemption when its principles, morals and values must be enforced by law, rather than lived out by choice.  When abortion numbers in this country have dropped, it is because Democratic presidential administrations were able to get measures through Congress that dealt with the root causes of the problem.  The religious right has had every opportunity to put its resources to work in the same way, and it doesn't seem to have made much of a difference.  

I'm personally opposed to abortion as anything more than a means to save the life of a mother in a medical emergency.  I may have an opinion and a belief, but I can't make a decision, nor would I have to live with one, in the case where someone got pregnant as the result of a rape.  I can't understand how that would feel, so I'll stay out of it.  I have been engaged in work that has aided those who are providing the education, and the help to combat poverty, that gets results.  And I take the position that sanctity of human life means exactly that, and if one believes a fetus in the womb is human life, then one must also be opposed to the presence of assault weapons for the purpose of taking life.  Can't have that both ways, it's philosophically and morally inconsistent.  


Wednesday, May 10, 2023

The Ten Commandments, MAGA Version

The Texas Legislature wants to post the Ten Commandments in every classroom in the state.  While that would be a violation of the establishment clause, and the conscience of anyone who sees those commandments as religiously based, it would be completely inconsistent with far right wing extremist Republican Trumpism to put up ten commandments which Trump himself ignores and violates every time he takes a breath and opens his mouth.  

So maybe these would work better. 

1. Thou shalt have no other gods before Donald Trump.  Or after Donald Trump. 

2. Thou shalt make a graven image unto him. 


3. Thou shalt believe conspiracy theories spoken in the name of Donald Trump.

4. Remember the Rally date, to keep it holy. 

5. Honor your father and your mother, if they gave you an inheritance and set you up to cheat in business. 

6. Thou shalt not kill unless they are liberals, foreigners, Democrats, Latinos, Asians or African Americans and thou art using an assault rifle.

7. Thou shalt commit adultery to humiliate thy wives, with porn stars, and anyone who thinketh thou art a celebrity, or in a dressing room of a high end retail store and she says "No!"  

8. Thou shalt not steal unless it adds to the value of your company.  This includes not paying thy contractor invoices.

9. Thou shalt not bear false witness unless it is to thy advantage, embellishes thy resume, enhances thy stock portfolio or convinces idiots to vote for thyself.  

Oh, what the hell.  

9. Thou shalt not tell the truth, ever. 

10. Thou shalt not covet unless what thou are coveting has significant monetary value or brings significant political advantage, or it isn't yours.   

Tuesday, May 9, 2023

Right Wing Logic and Conclusions Make Greg Abbott and Ted Cruz Child Killers

If legislators who choose to support women's reproductive rights are blamed for every abortion that happens, as if they did it themselves, and are labelled baby killers, shouldn't Greg Abbott and Ted Cruz, because of their stance on unregulated assault rifle sales, be blamed for the deaths at the mall in Allen, Texas?  And since two of the victims were small children, sisters, a second grader and a fourth grader, doesn't that make them child killers?  

Just asking.  But that would be the same thing, in the twisted political rhetoric that the far right uses.  

They can't be labelled as pro-life.  At least, if the same standard they apply to those on the left who see the issue as a matter of individual choice and personal conscience is used to judge them.  Clearly, if they are in favor of the completely unregulated sale of guns that are designed to kill human beings with maximum effectiveness, with a force that separates body parts, ensures almost certain death and leaves the remains a mangled mess, then they can't be considered pro-life, that would be hypocritical and contradictory. Murder is a sin, and legislators and government officials who are in favor of a hands off approach to the sale of weapons designed specifically to commit it are guilty of it.  That's exactly what tagging lawmakers who favor abortion rights as baby killers does.  So that's fair.  

But there's some hypocrisy here, too.  How close to the state capitol or the governor's mansion in Texas do you think a heavily armed nut job equipped with an assault rifle would get?  People attending his campaign rallies last year had to pass through metal detectors to get in.  Maybe that's one way to make Texas safe.  Make everyone entering an outlet mall, a church, a school, or the downtown shopping district go through metal detectors.  But that would violate the second amendment rights of someone who wanted to carry their assault rifle inside that perimeter.  At least, in their way of thinking it would.  But they wouldn't let someone like that get that close to them.  That's just for the rest of us.  

Remember, Cruz is the guy who headed for Cancun when an ice storm paralyzed the state and shut down the power grid and left everyone else in the cold without even a comment.  The shooting took place in an outlet mall, not someplace he would shop.  As long as none of his family members are effective, he doesn't care.  And the same goes for the governor.  They're where they are for themselves and their bank accounts, not for the people. 

The fact that the Texas governor wants to pardon a shooter makes it pretty clear he's not against murder.  If Daniel Perry is pardoned, that's a lot more direct evidence and accountability for killings committed with guns that rests with the governor than anything legislators who are pro-choice have to their credit. A pardon sends a strong political message, in this case, that it is OK to kill someone for misinterpreting their actions or not liking the way they look at you.  Or if they share your right wing conspiracy theories, fear mongering and political backwardness.  

Nor can Cruz or Abbott be said to support and care about family values.  One entire family, except for a six year old child, was murdered in this rampage.  They're dead because the governor of Texas supports unrestricted ownership and sale of assault rifles made for the purpose of mowing down families.  That's how it was used in this case. And the murderer was able, because of Abbott's and Cruz's failure to pass legislation requiring background checks and restricting gun ownership by crazy nut jobs, to kill nine people.  So much for families getting together and enjoying an afternoon of shopping at the suburban outlet mall.  In Texas, even in the suburbs, getting shot is a real danger, thanks to their governor and senator.  And what help do you think the governor will offer the six year old who is the only survivor in the family?  

A couple of weeks ago, when a private, Christian school was attacked and six people were killed in Nashville, at least the governor started using words like background checks and limits on assault rifle ownership.  But that's because that shooting happened on his turf, at a private, Christian school where his wife knew one of the victims.  Abbott and Cruz are headed in the opposite direction, because these were just ordinary people, and they, frankly, care more about their gun lobby dollars than they do about the people they were elected to represent.  

Both have offered the victim's families their thoughts and prayers.  I just wonder who hears their prayers.  



Monday, May 8, 2023

Politics Smothers the Christian Message of American Conservative Evangelicals

"Evangelicals, this is your guy," so said Joe Scarborough on his Morning Joe segment on MSNBC this morning.  

He was referencing Donald Trump.  You know, the twice divorced man of the world, who has cheated in business, defaulted on debt, indicted for lying about a payoff for political purposes to a porn star with whom he had an affair, currently undergoing a civil trial for an alleged rape, the instigator of the January 6th insurrection, a pathological liar and con artist who dabbles in conspiracy theories, advocates revenge politics. twice impeached for mind-boggling corruption.  That guy.  

There are a lot of things Evangelicals claim to believe which they say distinguishes them from other Christians, specifically Catholics and liberal, mainline Protestants.  I grew up in an Evangelical church, so I can recite from memory most of what they claim are "distinctives" of their doctrine and theology which set them apart from other Christians and, in their eyes, demonstrate that they are the "true church" in a world of pretenders.  But the evidence that comes from observing what they do creates an entirely different impression than what they claim.  

For all of the distinguishing they do, classifying Christians they don't like as liberals, and their long standing condemnation of Catholicism, the political posturing of many Evangelical leaders in the extreme far right of Republicanism is a convincing argument against taking any of them seriously when it comes to what they preach about their faith.  From embracing politicians who are practitioners of liberal mainline denominations, including one former President who was a close friends with the first gay Episcopalian bishop, or who have no known Christian background or church membership, to embracing one particular Republican who is the epitome of worldliness as described in the scripture, far right political Evangelicals are saying to the world, "Our faith means nothing.  Politics is everything."  

Their "guy," a politician that white Evangelicals have supported at higher levels than any other Republican, is an adulterer by Biblical definition, by his own admission, hundreds of times.  He is twice divorced, in situations where he openly humiliated the women he abandoned, in both cases marrying the one with whom he had an affair.  He has been found guilty, multiple times, of business fraud in ventures aimed at cheating people out of their money.  He has defaulted on multiple debts.  He is a prolific, provable, pathological liar.  

Their "guy" is currently on trial for rape, and facing multiple indictments for business fraud in a case where he authorized hush money payments to a porn star he slept with.  How's that for giving a testimony to Christian values?  Indictments are coming for his role in inciting the January 6th seditious insurrection against the government, something that would be totally against the values of Christian faith.  His dishonesty and corruption doesn't warrant support from any segment of the American population.  The fact that his supporters don't seem to care about the danger he poses to American democracy and our freedom is an indication of their own disloyalty and ignorance.  

The fact that he has plenty of support from white Evangelicals, in spite of his lifestyle and image being the diametric opposite of what they claim to value and preach, means that they can't be taken seriously on any subject, especially since they are so easily willing to abandon their principles and the gospel of Jesus Christ for political expediency.  Apparently, they don't trust God to do their political bidding or don't believe he can.  

That doesn't mean Christianity is not a valid faith.  There are plenty of American Christians who haven't sold their birthright for a bowl of soup (an Old Testament example).  There are plenty of American Christians, in fact, who do live by the virtues and values of the faith, who love their neighbor as they love themselves and who love this country and the freedom that results from its democratic principles.  They see all humanity as a creation of God, in his image, with lives that have value and meaning and purpose.  And they wouldn't compromise their faith for political expediency.  

They are supporters of a constitutional democracy that puts a wall of separation between church and state, in much the same way as the early Christian apostles did, recognizing faith as a matter of individual conscience, not government coercion.  They have separated themselves out from the infiltration of evil into the church on the coat-tails of far right wing extremism. Most of the Evangelicals who are still true to the Christian gospel are minorities.   The biggest difference between them and the political religious far right is the difference in who their savior really is.  Theirs is Jesus, the political religious right believes in Donald Trump.  

So it's not surprising people have trouble listening to the message these Christians are supposed to be preaching, one of redemption by grace through faith in Christ, not one of achieving its ends by the use of secular, political power.  It's not possible to claim to be a Christian who has doctrinal and theological ducks correctly lined up, and yet choose Donald Trump as a political leader.  Christ has no fellowship with Belial, and Christians have no fellowship with Trump.  

The political support Trump gets from the religious right is a visible sign of heresy, apostasy and corruption in the church, and of their abandonment of the Bible, the virtues and values preached and taught by Christ, and of his sacrificial, redemptive death on the cross.  As Scarborough said this morning, "He's THEIR guy."  They stand for what he stands for. Not Jesus.  

For certain intruders have stolen in among you, people who long ago were designated for this condemnation as ungodly, who pervert the grace of our Lord into licentiousness and deny Jesus Christ.  Jude, V. 4  


Sunday, May 7, 2023

The Invasion of Pure Evil That is America's Second Civil War

Salon: Weaponizing Republicans' Words 

I saw this coming.  

I don't remember the exact year, I'd say probably 1992 or 1993.  I was driving home from visiting a friend in the hospital in Poplar Bluff, Missouri.  It was sixty miles and the Ozarks are thinly populated with few towns large enough to have radio stations.  The FM station I was listening to was fading out, and I couldn't find another decent station so I flipped over to the AM side of the dial, and picked up a talk show in the middle of its hour long broadcast.  

The whiny-voiced commentator was droning on about everything that was wrong with the Clinton administration.  It was mostly a run-down of conservative speculation about all of the bad things that would now happen as a result of Clinton's presidency.  Nothing that he said ever came about, it was the kind of speculation aimed at scaring people who wouldn't be frightened by what was really happening.  It bordered on hate speech in a few places, the voice not hiding its owners contempt for Clinton.  

But the last half of the program was what kept me from changing the dial.  Like many Americans, I was kind of naive about the extent that outright lies could be broadcast on the radio.  But this guy was laying out plans to use democratic institutions to undermine democracy.  He pushed for far right wing extremists to avoid any kind of compromise, and use the power of their elected office to undermine government.  He was a huge proponent of gerrymandering, encouraging Republicans in power to redraw maps that shut out their political opposition and then fight in the courts to keep it from being undone.  He advocated for voting rights to be extended to property and business owners only, and no one should be allowed to vote if they didn't own property or pay property tax.  

My first thought was, "This guy is some kind of raving lunatic.  Why does this radio station broadcast this tripe?"  My second thought was that if this stuff caught on, it could create unimaginable chaos and to me, it sounded like some kind of intentional foreign plot to undermine the United States using its own government power to do so.  

Oh, the guy's name?  Rush Limbaugh.  

And Look What's Happened

How it happened that a failed radio disc jockey, a guy who wasn't highly successful at putting an electronic arm with a needle in it on a plastic disc and telling the listeners the name of the song and the artist, could become one of the most influential media pundits of Republicanism, hijacking a political party and turning it into what is mostly a collection of extremist elements, is as grotesque as how it was that a failed postcard painter and homeless Vienna vagrant became the Fuhrer of Germany.  

And what we have is exactly unimaginable chaos.  Look at the news cycle.  Eight people, who dressed in casual clothes and shoes and headed out for some shopping at a cookie-cutter, suburban outlet mall did not go home, murdered because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.  And while those images appeared on the screen, the corruption of the Republicans nominated to the nation's highest court, most notably Clarence Thomas, accepting massive financial gifts and failing to disclose them, just grows like a genie coming out of a bottle.  Thomas' confirmation hearing was cluttered with evidence of his lack of the kind of ethics expected of court justices, including allegations of sexual harassment which have since been confirmed as accurate.  

Limbaugh, who was a supporter of Thomas, insisted on ignoring his lack of ethics and the sexual harassment, criticism of which he compared to "lynching," which was an intentional downplaying of the terror endured by African Americans in the South in their efforts to secure justice, pushed his "no compromise" position supporting his confirmation.  That opened the door to another confirmation nightmare, placing another justice on the court amid credible accusations of even worse sexual abuse.  

The former failed President 45 himself, now indicted in a scandal involving paying off a pornography star with whom he had an affair, is also engaged in a rape trial.  Had he been a Democrat, the caterwauling would be endless, with Republicans falling all over each other to mark the man guilty with no presumption of innocence, and completely write him off.  I really don't know why more Democrats aren't doing the same, and taking full advantage of the opportunity, except that something like this, which would have been a political earthquake twenty years ago now barely gets a yawn.  

The substance of this is nothing compared to the real danger, not only to national security, but to our whole constitutional democracy, that culminated in an attempted coup against the United States on January 6, 2021.  Are we so desensitized to all of the carnage of kids in schools, shoppers in a mall, people watching a fourth of July parade, and all of the corruption and bribery that the newscasters reel off hour after hour without much emotion or emphasis that the impact and significance of January 6th will be lost on us?  Or, what may even be unimaginably worse than that, the documents that were illegally transported and stored at Mar-a-Lago in the failed former President's possession, done at his orders?  

Nothing that the Republican party ever stood for had an appeal or attraction for me.   In my lifetime, the Republican presidencies were mediocrities, in terms of achievement that strengthened the country and benefitted the people.  But as media coverage expanded, in terms of both coverage and the amount of time spend on the air, the political philosophy pushed by Rush Limbaugh, who was imitated by almost everyone else in right wing media who came along after his 1984 debut, has brought us to the place where achieving ends that are far right and extremist, justifies lying, inventing conspiracy theories, deceit, corruption and the subversion of government authority and the rule of law, even if it involves shooting kids in schools, worshippers in church or shoppers in a mall.  

The Second Civil War is Here

We have tended to imagine a second civil war in this country in the same way that the first one materialized.  I would place the start date around 2010, when Republicans, following Limbaugh's blueprint, took advantage of Democrats sitting out a mid-term election to put themselves in position to gerrymander state legislative districts and congressional districts in as many as 30 of the 50 states, to secure for themselves what had been an illusive majority.  The relentless attack continues as county supervisor boards, school boards, city councils and other levels of government are captured.  

Evangelical Christian churches and denominations were early battlefronts.  Abortion, and LGBTQ rights are single issues that activate voters, but Christian nationalism has always been simmering beneath the surface.  The susceptibility of Christian churches to infiltration by deceivers who know the lingo and how to "baptize" an agenda and make it appear as part of the gospel itself goes back to the early church.  One of the early Apostles, Jude, wrote an epistle warning about intruders who would bring in destructive heresy in the form of false doctrine, tempting leaders with political influence.  In spite of hair-raising immorality and corruption, many Christians abandon the principles of the Christian gospel and throw Jesus under the bus in their support for Trumpism.  

The attack on the integrity of the election process, which actually began when Trump was nominated the first time, and claimed that if Hillary Clinton won, it could only be because of massive voter fraud, is another front of this civil war.  I heard a radio pundit, one of Limbaugh's wannabees, outlining the ways that President Obama could stop Trump from getting to the White House, including mentioning that then Vice-President Biden only needed to find a way to get alternative electors into place, or declare martial law on some pretense of "national emergency," and simply stop the inauguration.  

The judiciary has been targeted and everywhere and every time Republicans are in charge of appointing judges, they find the most extremists they can gather.  It's difficult, though not impossible, to find Ivy League-trained judges who will set aside the law to legislate conservative issues from the bench, so they are relying, increasingly, on those trained in the law schools operated by white Christian nationalists like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, both of whom controlled universities that cranked out high volumes of law student graduates with the goal of packing courts with them.  Look at their resumes.  Many of those appointed by Republicans at the state and federal level, even with advanced law degrees from the Ivy League, or places like Stanford or some of the more liberal state universities got their JD from schools like Liberty or Regent.  

We Can't Sit Back, Play Politics as Usual, Twiddle Our Thumbs and Click our Tongues

This war is quite far along in its progress already.  The influence of money is the big weapon used by the evil invasion to win their ground. The second weapon they have is blatant, inexcusable ignorance.  They turn out and vote in every election.  They narrow down the rhetoric to catch phrases and easily repeatable memes that people remember, whether they are true or not.  They take the tools at their disposal and make them work.  Their leaders acknowledge that they are getting their votes from the uninformed, most prejudices and biased, least educated and most ignorant elements of society.  That there are so many Americans in that position is unfathomable, and tragic.  

Democrats debate policy issues, play the political game and keep thinking that compromise and making deals across the aisle will work, in spite of almost universal failure.  That all has to stop.  The stakes are too high.  If, by chance, the Republicans manipulation of the election process lead to nullification of large blocks of Democratic votes, even in red states, and massive voter suppression, which it is very close to achieving now, and Trump is still running around free at election time, and happens to win, the war is over and they win it.  American constitutional democracy will not survive his second term.  

That's one of the reasons we are adamant and insistent that the DOJ get the indictment process under way, raining them down on him for everything possible on January 6th, and with the documents, and then use their power and influence to fast track the trials and get enough convictions to nullify his candidacy and keep him from securing the GOP nomination, perhaps, if there is justice, getting him incarcerated for the rest of his life.  That has to happen.  If it doesn't then we are doomed.  The corruption that is already running rampant will take over.  

In hindsight, Democrats had the wherewithal to remain in complete control of Congress as a result of the mid-terms.  We lost the House, not because of red state gerrymandering, but because Democrats in stronghold states like California and New York did not turn out and vote!  New York losses alone, turned around, would have produced a draw.  But once again, there was a gap in leadership, people were asleep at the wheel, politics as usual and "woe is us" in midterm elections helped the GOP win a battle in this civil war.  

The judiciary is a battleground, but we're arguing about the distinguished career of a California senator who sits on the judiciary committee.  That's what I'm talking about here.  Do you think the Republicans wouldn't figure out, in a short minute, how to speed up the process and would do whatever it took to make that happen?  These are people who lie to God and then laugh in his face and challenge him to do something about it.  Thank you Senator Feinstein, for doing the right thing and either sucking it up and heading back to the Capitol, or going home to California for the last time, letting Gavin Newsom put an even more liberal left winger in your seat.  

If we are to have any chance of making our schools or shopping centers safe places again, we have to fight for this and do whatever it takes to keep it from happening.  That may involve turning things upside down and taking advantage of the gifts that the Republicans are handing us through Marjorie Taylor Greene, Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert, Ron Desantis and of course, the failed former President 45.  And we need to make sure we are getting seats on school boards, city councils, county supervisor boards, and everywhere else that we can make a difference.  



Friday, May 5, 2023

The Southern Baptist Convention is Missing a Historic Opportunity to Shed Their White Supremacist Image

 SBC Executive Committee Misses Historic Opportunity to Heal Racial Division

The executive committee of the Southern Baptist Convention is the entity which runs the denomination's business between its annual meetings.  Composed of 86 individuals from all of the various state convention bodies of the denomination, it is a powerful and influential group.  It takes a lot of back slapping and glad handing, or what my mother would call "schmoozing," to even get nominated to serve on the committee.  Once there, the opportunity to control the direction of what is the "largest Protestant denomination in the United States," is almost unlimited.  

It took a while, but the convention slowly tried to shed its racist image.  Resolutions were passed condemning slavery, repenting from past actions which endorsed the practice, partnering with a predominantly African American denomination in theological education and helping to support one of their theological schools, and eventually welcoming African American churches into the convention as full members.  Some African Americans were appointed to trustee boards of convention seminaries and mission boards, and a few were placed on the powerful Executive Committee.  

But to date, in the appointment of missionary personnel, faculty members at seminaries or employees at the denomination's publishing house in Nashville, Lifeway, the number of African Americans is lower than the percentage of their membership in the convention.  And no SBC entity, which includes six theological seminaries, two mission boards, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission and Lifeway Christian Publishers, has ever hired a minority for a major leadership position.  

One Glass Ceiling Broken in 2012

Fred Luter, Pastor of the Franklin Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans, was elected as President of the Southern Baptist Convention in 2012, and became the first African American to hold that office.  To his credit, during his term, he made sure that other African Americans who had been ignored or passed by when it came to trustee boards and committees in the denomination, were considered on their merits and appointed when they were qualified.  Being "qualified" for board and committee roles in the SBC isn't complicated.  Most of those who serve are pastors of churches, so it is for their perspective, not some high level of expertise, that they are selected.  So the excuse that had been used for years, that minorities would be chosen if they were equally qualified, wasn't the case.  

Looking at the educational background, professional history and expertise of 99% of the trustee board and committee positions in the SBC makes it clear that any ordinary church member is qualified for just about any position.  There are plenty of people who put themselves in a position to get their name considered.  It's usually done in exchange for favors or because some prominent pastor wants to "help out" a friend or a school chum.  

In spite of Luter's influence, as executive positions opened up in half a dozen Southern Baptist entities over half a decade, no minority candidates were selected, even though there were a few who did express an interest and asked for consideration from a search committee.  There were voices from within various parts of the denomination pointing this out, and noting that the old claim of considering minority candidates if they are equally qualified was a dodge, since a shroud of secrecy surrounded the selection process and search committees. 

These jobs do have some qualifications in terms of the profession, though most of them are administrative positions in which the staff does the technical work and the executive is their manager.  Most of those chosen over the past thirty years have been prominent, mega-church pastors who have connections to the inner circle of leadership of the gang that organized and carried out the "conservative resurgence."  The appointments Luter made during his two-year tenure were not enough to get a minority candidate in a position to be offered an executive job, in spite of the fact that the African American and Latino churches in the SBC are where the growth is occurring, as most white congregations die slow deaths.

A Historic Opportunity Arises

Tennessee pastor Willie McLaurin, an African American who was a member of the powerful Executive Committee, became the interim CEO of the committee when Ronnie Floyd, a long time convention insider and well connected Arkansas pastor who had been a leader in the long-term "conservative resurgence" was forced to resign because of tactics and actions he took, resisting the will of the convention body demanding accountability for a sexual abuse scandal that has plagued the SBC for a long time and about which they have only recently taken steps to handle. 

McLaurin has led the committee for eighteen months, through considerable controversy over the investigation into the abuse scandal, and multiple issues related to it.  He has proven, beyond any doubt, that he is as qualified as any Southern Baptist anywhere, for handling the responsibility and leadership of this position.  

But in the backward, quirky way that Southern Baptists do things, the first candidate for the job that the search committee produced was one of its own.  Jared Wellman, a pastor from Texas, who was the chairman of the Executive Committee and an ex-officio member of the search committee, suddenly resigned and shortly thereafter was announced as the search committee's recommendation for the job. For those not familiar with Southern Baptists, that might look like back door dealing and maneuvering and the work of a faction aiming to get "their guy" in the job because of his position on certain aspects of denominational politics.  For those familiar with the SBC, that's the way they do business.  Yes, I know it runs counter to ethical standards and Christian principles but in the SBC, when powerful people want something, none of that matters.  Jesus gets thrown under the bus, or out the window. 

But this time, whatever maneuvering or string pulling might have occurred to get Wellman in front of the Executive Committee for a vote, failed miserably.  Not only was the recommendation from the search committee voted down, it was overwhelmingly repudiated.  Only 31 of the 86 committee members voted in favor of hiring Wellman.  And in the aftermath of that vote on social media, one of the themes that emerged is disappointment that the search committee bypassed the interim CEO, Willie McLaurin, missing yet another opportunity to clear the record on the extent to which minorities are welcome in the denomination.  

This is not, in any way, considering a minority candidate because it's time to choose someone who is a minority.  There's no question McLaurin is qualified, since he has, for all intents and purposes, done the job as an interim for a year and a half, through some trying times.  I don't buy the argument that intentionally reversing discriminatory practices is either unbiblical, or is still discrimination.  Racism and discrimination are sins, and intentionally doing something to undo the results of sin is the right thing to do, something Jesus would do himself.  Those who resist this will bring out the name calling, the popular thing to label any effort to bring about racial equality now among this brand of far righters is that it's "Marxist."  Everything in the world they don't like is "Marxist."  

Anyone, then, who knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, commits sin.  James 4:17

So it is possible that McLaurin will get another shot at the job.  After the failed recommendation, the search committee is disbanded, a new committee is selected and the process starts over again.  Whether a new committee would choose McLaurin or not, there's another chance for that to happen.  Of course, there are those from whom the screeches and screams are coming out, wailing about the fact that considering someone because they are a minority, and to "achieve diversity" is unbiblical, and wrong, and racist.  Being "unbiblical" is a regular excuse that comes from some Southern Baptists, though they can't support that claim by finding an actual scripture that teaches their claim.  

Because McLaurin is qualified, with at least 15 years of experience in a mission board executive position in a large state convention, along with the obligatory pastorate of a big church, the old argument that minorities would be equally considered if they were equally qualified, no longer justifies passing him by.  He would not be the first better qualified African American for a job that a less qualified white person got among SBC executive positions.  And that fact alone wrecks any claim made to the fact that making this deliberate choice is discriminatory or unbiblical.  Think whatever you want.  It's not that.

But...And It's a Big One

There is an element in the denomination that will resist any African American candidate for this position in any way they can.  Even the few minorities who have been assimilated into the white culture, and don't belong to predominantly African American churches will be resisted and the claim will be made that they aren't equally qualified.  But here's the reality.  Those who have served in this position in the past have not had any specific special qualifications or technical skills.  They came from the pastorates of churches.  McLaurin, in addition to pastoral experience, has some years of denominational service working on the staff of the Tennessee Baptist Mission Board, which made him more qualified for an executive position than Wellman, a pastor.  

But if the Southern Baptist Convention wants its resolutions and words to take on genuine meaning, it has the opportunity to demonstrate that by abandoning its provincial backwardness and making this happen.  It would be the right thing to do, in the face of what has been either deliberate or subtle racism since it became a denomination in 1945, and that can be supported Biblically.  In context.  Otherwise, for a denomination that has lost three million members in less than a decade, and is increasingly becoming irrelevant, will likely see the exit of another 10% of its churches, which are predominantly African American.  And failure to make this change will also send a message to the large group of Hispanics, who are also members, and who are underrepresented on committees and boards.

The Southern Baptist Convention was formed in 1845 when Baptist churches in several southern states separated from the Triennial Convention, which did not allow slave owners to serve as missionaries.  Disagreeing with that decision, and anticipating the eventual separation of southern states to form the Confederacy, delegates from churches met in Augusta, Georgia and formed their own denominational body.  Long after the Civil War, churches affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention discriminated against African Americans by restricting them from church membership.