Friday, June 30, 2023

Stein's Green Party Candidacy in 2016 Can't Be Repeated in 2024: Democrats Need to Work Together

Advocating for a green new deal.  Believing that jobs, health care and education are basic human rights.  Government is obligated and bears responsibility to end poverty, oversee a just economy and guarantee equality in the application of freedom and justice.  "Power to the people" is the theme and slogan of the presidential nominee's candidacy.  

I love all of that, along with the need for government to become involved in radical justice, protecting human rights and the environment.  I find little with which to disagree in the Green Party platform, or in the 2016 Presidential candidacy of Dr. Jill Stein.  Their perspective on these specific issues represents my politics more closely than the more moderate and diverse platform of the Democratic party.  But in spite of that, realizing that our two party system is still the predominant factor in national elections, I couldn't think about casting a ballot for Stein, because I knew Stein didn't have a chance, and I knew that taking a vote away from Clinton could be detrimental to her chances. 

The only thing I disagree with in their party platform, or in Stein's candidacy, is their illusion that they could make a difference by running as a separate party, against all of the other candidates.  Stein in particular seems like a very well informed, well educated, well rounded individual with a genuine grasp of American problems and the ability of its government to work toward resolution.  But I have to question their thinking, really, when it comes to what they thought they might accomplish by running as a third party candidate for the Presidency.  

They were considerably short sighted in thinking that by running, they would not siphon votes off from the Democratic nominee.  If they didn't give that any consideration, then they were derelict in their ignorance.  Running against the two major party candidates, did they not see that they did not stand a snowball's chance on a hot stove of winning enough votes to carry one state, and knowing that would be the case, that taking votes away from the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, would completely doom any chance they had of seeing even one point of their agenda bear any fruit?  Did they openly, or secretly, prefer Trump over Clinton?  

Maybe they thought that they would not get enough votes to make a difference in any specific state, though that would call into question the sincerity of their belief in the things for which they are advocating and be defeating the purpose of running a third party candidacy in the first place.  If there hadn't been a Green Party, it would not be accurate to say that its members would have unanimously supported Clinton's bid for the White House.  That's not necessarily predictable, but it is plausible.  

If Stein and her party had taken a close look at how the election was shaping up in August or September, and realized that a Trump victory would mean no hope that their agenda and platform would be advanced, and that as the more progressive wing of the left, they would be subject to even more political grief than they would ever have endured under a Clinton presidency, she could have made a difference.  In fact, had Stein decided to abandon her candidacy, and throw her support to Clinton, not only is it much more likely that Clinton wins, but that she and her party would have a real voice in the Democratic party.  Because in the long run, had Clinton picked up 80% of the vote that Stein got in Wisconsin and Michigan, and slightly more than that in Pennsylvania, she would have been elected President.  The whole experiment with the orange headed buffoon, who worked to undo everything that the Green Party stands for, would never have happened. 

So not only did they fail to achieve their own party's objectives, by winning the Presidency, they also failed to put themselves in a position to have any influence in the government at all.  Trump opposes and worked hard against everything they stand for and believe, and want to do.  But it would have been a sure bet that they would have had a voice, probably a pretty significant one, in a Clinton administration.  Their issues have certainly not been ignored by President Biden.  

There are those who say that Stein's candidacy in 2016 wasn't the cause of Clinton's loss, and that most of those voters would have stayed home if they hadn't had a Green Party candidate, but I strongly disagree with that statement.  She had an organized candidacy and got support from voters over which she had enough influence to get them to cast their vote for her.  Is that a group that stays at home if they don't have a candidate to their liking?  I seriously doubt it.  She did take votes away from Clinton, enough to make a difference.  That wasn't the only cause of her loss, there were other factors including things that get judged in hindsight that weren't as easy to see before the election itself, related to Clinton's campaign.  But there is a valuable lesson to learn here about owning and taking responsibility for all of the issues across the party spectrum, because while they may not attract voters from the other side, they will certainly be considered by those who share similar values.

I realize that it goes against our stated democratic principles to frown on, discourage or otherwise discredit third party movements.  On the other hand, one of the things that the Democratic party in this country has been particularly skilled at doing is having a broader vision and a bigger platform.  They are the party of inclusion, and the spectrum of who is welcome within its ranks is broad and inclusive, sometimes to their own detriment.  But being more friendly to its progressive wing will not be detrimental to Democrats at this point in particular.  The support of a group that was able to put together a campaign drawing more than 1.5 million votes in 2016, and which did wind up taking enough votes from Clinton to make a difference in the election makes it worth considering the issues they want to bring to the table.  

We are at a point where the critical issue facing voters is the survival and strengthening of our constitutional democracy.  The Green Party, along with Libertarians and other independents need to come to grips with this reality and realize that nothing in their platform or agenda will matter if a Democrat is not elected to the White House in 2024.  So make common cause, accept what is an open invitation through the door and work to build a united front against an intrustion of fascism unlie any we have ever see.  On the other hand, Democrats need to be more flexible in broadening their agenda without creating conflict.  



Indulging in Some Speculation, and I'd Bet I've Got This Right

There is too much news on television.  

There.  I said it.  I never thought I would say it, but having multiple channels with news and commentary on 24 hours a day is way too much.  Here's how I know.  

We have been informed this week of the admission to the hospital of female pop star Madonna.  I thought we had reached some sort of over-saturation when several news outlets reported on Lady Gaga's lasik surgical procedure several years ago, and we found out that Cindy Lauper has psoriasis.  That's just more than we need, I think.  And on top of that, now we know that the President sleeps with a C-PAP machine.  Well good.  So do I.  It works.  I'm not nearly so cranky or tired when I get up in the morning.  

I'd be willing to bet that Trump needs one badly. 

And how is it in a few short paragraphs, working through senseless stuff, that we get to Trump?  Frankly, I just put that sentence there to make my point.  I really don't care enough about the man or what he does to be interested, which is why I spend a lot less time these days watching any news outlets, "mainstream" as they are called, or the cable news networks.  If I get an hour of MSNBC these days, that's a lot, and it is virtually impossible to watch an hour of cable news, even MSNBC, without seeing a disgusting image of the orange headed buffoon, or hearing about something he his doing, or how his poll numbers went up or down fourteen tenths of a half a point today because he belched after eating lunch at his Bedminster Country Club.  

If there's twenty minutes of reporting on another slew of indictments for his incitement of the insurrection and attack on the capitol on January 6th, I'm interested.  Otherwise, focus attention on something else, or I won't watch. 

Polls on the Election Are Worthless

I'm looking down the rows of polls of two composites this morning.  It's the same old same old same old.  Joe Biden's job approval rating runs from two polls that have him at 48%, to two that have him at 39%, and everything in between.  Trump approval goes as high as 43% and as low as 31%, with "disapprove" as high as 67% in two different YouGov polls and 65% in Morning Consult, and as low as 56% in another YouGov poll, which I assume are daily tracking polls, not averages.  I've seen head to head with Biden in Joe's favor as much as 49-40, and with him behind by one, 43-42.  

So I will draw on my own observations, ability to make political predictions, expertise of two degrees and a background in history, civics and political science, and instruction of high school and junior college students in Constitutional Law and American Government, and I'll do some speculating at this point, a year and a half away from the next election, and I'll leave it here so that my accuracy can be checked, if I, or some reader, remembers this that far along in the future.  

I used to do this with my high school classes at the beginning of a school year.  I would predict the outcome of an election, which states would be red, which ones blue, and guess the electoral totals.  I missed one, the 2000 election between Bush and Gore, not because I didn't pick Florida to go red, which I did, but because I picked Tennessee to go blue, which would have given Gore the win without Florida.  He lost the state by about 80,000 votes with some shenanigans going on there that may have suppressed the black vote.  But that got lost in the reporting about Florida.  And I started with Reagan and Carter in 1980, so I have a good track record.  

Knowing how to read the polls is one thing, but trends also have to be looked at.  I predicted that Bill Clinton would carry the state of Arizona in 1996, the first time for a Democrat since 1948, by looking at the fact that there was no senate or governor's race, but the sitting governor, Fife Symington, was involved in dozens of real estate and business scandals and corruption and was extremely unpopular, following his Republican predecessor, Evan Mecham, who had been impeached and removed.  Republicans, disgusted, just didn't turn out in their usual numbers.  Those things make a difference.

So Lets Have Some Fun So We Can Watch Something Besides Trump's Corruption on 24 hour Cable News

Outside of unforeseen circumstances, including the daily, "what did Trump do now" broadcasts, the issues that are going to be influential in motivating voters are becoming pretty clear.  

1.  It's the economy...well...let's just leave it at that!  

All of the things that came together to create the perfect storm that allowed Donald Trump to pick up enough electoral votes to get elected President are not lining up this time around.  President Biden's infrastructure bill is putting resources into areas where voters switched from Obama to Trump, an odd switch, but caused by frustration over the fact that the jobs weren't coming back in their area.  Trump got far too many working class voters in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, because he made a lot of promises to them and acted like he was on their side.  Then he turned his back on them to give tax cuts to the rich.  So, all three of those states flipped back in 2020, and pretty much held or made more progress during the mid-terms.  

President Biden is putting his economic achievements at the front and center of his re-election campaign.  Good for him, good for the working class, good for America and good enough to solidify his electability.  

2.  This Supreme Court's Historic Low Approval will Help President Biden Get Re-elected. 

The way the court has finished out this week has, in the opinion of this writer, all but secured the President's re-election.  Their rulings this week, especially on affirmative action in college admissions and now, on student loan relief, will be major motivation to get the constituencies that traditionally support Democrats excited about voting and move them to the polls. Independent voters also seem to be disgusted by the far right bias exhibited by the court.  

Elections matter, and this is one huge reason why.  The political fallout from the Dobbs decision, overturning Roe v. Wade, hasn't waned, and in fact, as the consequences of that decision have had far reaching effects, it has pushed the President's support among women voters to 58%, according to a recent NBC poll.  And a Hollywood script writer couldn't come up with better plots for judicial corruption than the conservative justices who have indulged in gifts from those who have a direct financial interest in their rulings.  The only consequence to this ridiculously unethical behavior has been a slap on the wrist, essentially, from Senator Durbin, putting pressure on Roberts to come up with an ethics code.  

But the American people have power over the court through the ballot box, and this will be a vote getter for the President.  The possibility of President Biden being able to appoint two or three more justices, or even better, the Senate amending the Judiciary Act to add more seats to the court to end its conservative majority, is not as far fetched as we might think.  It will be a factor in the 2024 election favoring the President and the Democratic party. 

3.  Everything Trump. 

If the most corrupt, least effective, worst President in American history is on the ballot as the nominee of the Republican party, I believe this is the biggest factor in getting President Biden re-elected.  Clear out all the flotsam and factoring used by pollsters to even out their numbers in proportion to what they think, but really don't know, the electorate will look like.  President Biden bested Trump by eight million votes nationwide in 2020 and added five states to his electoral vote total that Trump carried in 2016--Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona.  

Indictments, crimes committed, and a general inability to accept reality, which causes the man to be a pathological liar who can't deal with reality is the guy that President Biden is running against.  This is a man who is now refusing to debate the candidates from the other parties because debates expose his lies and cause public criticism which he can't handle.  He has painted himself into a corner with a solid base of support among those who have no understanding of how constitutional democracy works, and who have isolated themselves in a media bubble and have absolutely no idea how destructive his Presidency was to this country, and to them personally, nor how much President Biden has achieved since he's been in office. 

Indictments for crimes don't just get invented by the Department of Justice on political grounds, not in the United States of America, at least, not until Trump turned the DOJ on its side and made it his personal legal defender.  Incompetence doesn't produce success.  Trump is clearly past his peak, and while he has convinced some people to support him, mostly those who were already prone to dissatisfaction with government and favorable to a more anarchic, anti-social lifestyle, his four years in office and his antics upon leaving, and since, have brought his unfavorable impression to more than 60% of the electorate, 67% in several of the more credible polls.  

From my own observation, I think his base is probably somewhere around 25%, maybe less than that.  Yes, he has a big lead among the pitiful cluster of Republicans who have announced intentions to seek the nomination, but even among registered Republicans, he's only hitting at somewhere between 47% and 50%.  That's not good enough to win the White House back.  

It's Not That These Things Don't Matter, But...

There are a lot of things that used to matter a lot to Americans, but don't seem to get much attention now.  I'm appalled at the lack of interest in the Russian invasion of Ukraine.  Yes, that's halfway around the world, and its European politics, former Soviet Union politics, which most Americans have filed away with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and its Communist threat.  But a Russian oligarchy, armed with nuclear weapons, is more dangerous than the Soviet Union was.  Ukraine is fighting for the exact same thing that Americans fought for in 1776, their right to the freedom of self-determination.  

The work that President Biden did in re-unifying and re-energizing the NATO alliance was nothing short of a foreign policy miracle.  The hope of freedom of all of the world's people lies in the strength of this alliance.  In the twentieth century, this achievement alone would have been enough to motivate voters and get the President re-elected.  Sadly, while it represents a monumental diplomatic achievement, most Americans yawn and go about their business.  

The economic achievements of this President are also monumental.  His policies have driven unemployment down a full 8% since taking office two and a half years ago, and it is now holding at the lowest rate achieved since the 1960's.  Inflation has been rough, but it was worldwide, and it was worse in most other places in the world than it has been here, and now, it is on the decline, on the timetable that the President said it would be.  And that nagging recession that the media has been squawking about for two and a half years is just not materializing.  We are seeing private sector job growth like we have not seen it in over 50 years.  And the infrastructure bill, which is just now getting things into place, has already earned accolades from Republican Senators Tuberville and Cornyn, even though they voted against the benefits it is providing.  I'm sure the President will duly thank these two Republicans for their warm endorsement of his policy.  

A majority of Americans are, for the most part, well educated and informed enough to know what is going on, and most don't pay attention to the frivolous idiocy that goes on surrounding the daily appearance of the orange headed buffoon on television for one thing or another.  Maybe at some point, the majority of the media will become responsible journalists again, with some sense of morality and ethics as defenders of accountability and democracy instead of purveyors of sensationalism.  

But I think that the country's experiment with an anti-government insurrectionist, a hater of law and order and a fraud in every way, including lying about his own wealth, is over.  If Trump succeeds in getting the GOP nomination, which I think isn't as certain as the media thinks, and is less than 50-50 at the moment, Joe Biden will be re-elected by a wider margin than he won in 2020.  He will carry states that give him at least 343 electoral votes.  If the GOP unwisely nominates Desantis, or another Trumpie wannabee, it will be an even bigger victory for Biden.  



Wednesday, June 28, 2023

Far Right Political Group Gives Money to Southern Baptist Conservative Faction

Turning Point Contributes to Conservative Faction in the Southern Baptist Convention 

It should not come as a surprise that a far right, religious based political front operating as a pro-Trump PAC is providing financial support for a faction in the Southern Baptist Convention that is attempting to gain control of the denomination's leadership positions and its entities.  Turning Point, led by a MAGA operative by the name of Charlie Kirk, is a political arm of the Trump campaign, aimed at religious conservatives.  

The Conservative Baptist Network, known as CBN, formed within the Southern Baptist Convention with the announced intention of working to gain control of the executive committee, trustee boards and officer positions of the Southern Baptist Convention.  The claimed motivation is based on their perception that the denomination is once again drifting into the wilderness of liberalism, based on their disagreement with its choice of leadership, specifically because one of the "architects" of the "Conservative Resurgence" in the convention, a movement which began a takeover effort in 1979, was fired for dereliction of duty from his position as president of one of the SBC's six seminaries, which he named and received as a reward for his political efforts.  

They were also upset that the convention rejected an attempt to bring a very slanted, misinformed, inaccurate resolution on Critical Race Theory, written by an outside political faction.  The resolution contained false assertions, misconceptions and errors in stating its case against Critical Race Theory.  It was headed off by two black pastors serving on the resolutions committee who saw that, if passed, would be a major embarrassment to the convention, the propagation of a lie by a Christian denomination.  And they were upset that the executive director of their Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, being consistent with the use of the word "ethics", was openly opposed to the candidacy and presidency of Trump.  Aside from the fact that he was a staunch doctrinal and theological conservative, and had more knowledge of historic Baptist positions on separation of church and state than any of his critics, they could not stomach the spokesperson for their denomination being opposed to a man who exhibited none of the characteristics of a Christian life or walk.    

All of that, they insist, are signs that the convention is becoming "woke," so they organized a faction, complete with a board and officers, because among Southern Baptists, nothing can be achieved until it is made clear who the prominent and important people are, and set out to raise money in order to get their candidate elected president of the convention.  It could be argued, in a denomination where membership and attendance is on the decline, and funds are becoming more and more scarce for missionary and evangelistic ministry, that the last thing they need is to put money into a political campaign, including flying their candidate around to various rallies and gatherings.  They have failed to get any of their candidates elected to any of the officer positions in the SBC, even the ones that have no real power other than organizing an annual meeting of their group.  

Though they vehemently deny they are really Trump campaign advocates within the denomination, which is exactly what they are, it is clear there are plenty of connections.  The resolution on Critical Race Theory that came into the convention in 2019, before it was modified significantly and passed reluctantly, came through members of CBN who were serving as messengers, getting it from a far right political action group, none other than Turning Point U.S.A.  It was originally introduced by a California pastor with connections to the Falwells and Liberty University. 

There's a Whole Lot of Irony Here, and Even More Hypocrisy 

The aim of the CBN, at least, what they claim they are seeking, is doctrinal purity for the Southern Baptist Convention.  These are individuals who claim they believe in the inerrancy and infallibility of the Bible, and who are so certain that their way of interpreting the Bible is the right way to interpret it that they support the removal of churches from cooperation with the SBC if they have women on their staff who serve in any role labelled as a pastor.  

You'd think that if they are that doctrinaire and narrow in their beliefs, they would be more careful in making sure that groups with which they associate, and which help them advance their cause by giving them money, are in agreement with their own convictions.  But they've accepted at least $50,000 in support from Turning Point U.S.A., in spite of the fact that there are serious differences of interpretation and opinion between Charlie Kirk, its executive director, and the CBN's stated views.  Kirk, in fact, would be pretty close to being a heretical apostate, in the view of CBN, if he weren't a major MAGA Pac.  

So CBN stands behind kicking out Southern Baptist churches that don't see eye to eye with them on women in the pastorate, but they take money from Turning Point, with whom their agreement is almost exclusively political, and even at that, ignores morals and ethics.  

It was at a Turning Point rally in Phoenix last year that Don Junior made a speaking appearance, and as he stuttered and bumbled his way through the address, told those gathered there that following the teachings of Jesus and his gospel wouldn't get them anywhere in this world.  Jesus was too much about turning the other cheek, and loving his enemies, and Don Junior said that he sort of understood that, but that was probably the reason why Christians were not getting anywhere in this world anymore.  

And CBN is fine with that, but not with a convention that wants to be honest and tell the truth in the resolutions that it passes.  

Truth Exposed

So CBN is really just a MAGA group within the Southern Baptist Convention.  How does that old saying go, if it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck........? 

"Just wait," CBN's leaders said, after losing votes in Anaheim at last years SBC annual meeting.  "Next year we will be in New Orleans and that will be a lot closer to our territory.  We'll have the votes to win when we get there."  

And so, the current SBC president, Bart Barber, who ran against Mike Stone, the Georgia pastor who was the CBN candidate, won re-election by a two to one margin on their turf, in New Orleans, earlier this month.  CBN's vote totals have been smaller each year since they have been organized and have announced a candidate.  That's good for Southern Baptists, in keeping their denomination out of the hands of leadership that are only interested in using it for political purposes and financial gain.  

But it should be disturbing to Evangelical Christians everywhere in America, seeing that secular politics under Trump is working to subvert churches and denominations, turning them away from their Christian mission and purpose, and from the gospel of Jesus, and into political action committees devoid of spiritual authority and power, and full of poisoned heresy.  

The Apostle Jude warned the early Christians of such kinds of intrusions.  These are good words to remember today. 

For certain intruders have stolen in among you, people who, long ago were destined for this condemnation as ungodly, who pervert the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only master and Lord, Jesus Christ.  V. 4  

Monday, June 26, 2023

"I Am a Ukrainian"

There is a mahogany bookcase in my office, about six feet high, on which I have placed part of my professional library, including some books about education, but mostly volumes about various aspects of history.  Last spring, I hung a Ukrainian flag from the top of the bookcase.  The flag was smaller than I really wanted, but it covers the upper fourth of the shelves and the bookcase, a splash of color in an otherwise dull scene of drab office furniture.  

I don't work too far from Chicago's Ukrainian Village neighborhood.  Like most neighborhoods in the city, the ethnic divisions have blurred over the years but you can still find a couple of decent Ukrainian restaurants there, Old Lviv being one of my favorites, and a Ukrainian souvenir shop of sorts, mainly selling food, candy and what I call "comfort items" from the old country, mainly to help those who have emigrated to the United States keep a little piece of home close to them.  

Last spring, not for any real reason except I thought that I might occasionally pick up some news about what was happening in the war from a Ukrainian perspective, I started listening to an online radio station from Kyiv.  It plays a variety of easy listening, jazz and pop music, most of it American style, with an occasional European artist thrown in, and there are intermittent news broadcasts and announcements.  It's not at all like I expected to hear from a radio station in a country at war, no urgency, no news flashes or sharp bulletins.  It sounds like their purpose is to be calm, to put people at ease, to sound as normal and peaceful as possible, to help people get through the day with as little anxiety and fear as possible.  

The advertisements and news are all in Ukrainian.  Occasionally, there is an English word thrown in here or there, but for the most part, I don't understand any of the words. On several occasions, I recognized the voice of President Zelenskyy, and once, I did hear remarks made by President Biden when he went to Kyiv. I was asked, on a couple of occasions, by visitors in my office, if I understood what was being said, and I said no, but by now, I've become used to it and I don't notice anymore.  

And of course, there was the inevitable question, by someone who was particularly observant on a day when I wore a blue shirt with a gold and blue tie.  

"Are you Ukrainian?"  

I started to say, "No," but I thought about it for a moment, and, confident that I knew the person well enough to engage in discussion on this subject, I said, "Aren't we all?"  

The Ukrainian people are as distinct from their Russian neighbors, and from those in the neighboring countries of Belarus, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and Moldava, as Polish people are from Germans, or as the French are from the Dutch, or, for that matter, as Americans are from Japanese.  The culture is different, the language is similar, but different, the society is different.  The history has made them distinctly different.  Russian rulers, from the Czars to the Communist dictators, never considered Ukrainians as equals, but always as vassals in a feudal sort of way that reflected Russia's own social structure into the twentieth century.  

I know that, not only from history, but because over the past few years, I have met, and become good friends, with several Ukrainian families who made the choice to emigrate to America because they were uncertain of the political stability of their part of the world and didn't care much for living so close to Putin's Russia.  They brought their families here, for the safety and security of their children, and to provide them with an education and opportunity they were not certain would be theirs because they lived with a constant threat and fear of Russian dominance and aggression.  

These are families who came here before the current political chapter of Ukraine had emerged.  But the invasion of Russia confirmed their decision for them, one family coming from Donetsk, another from Mariupol, and two others from Lviv.  The quotas under US immigration policy for Ukrainians was very limited before the war, so when the opportunity came, and their names came up on the list, they took the opportunity and came here, to be close to other family members who came before them.  

What I have gained from knowing them is a deeper appreciation for the freedom that we have as Americans, living in a constititional democracy where our rights are protected.  Prior to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the creation of independent Ukraine in 1991, they only dreamed of this kind of freedom.  The transition from communism to democracy was not easy for Ukraine.  The gratitude these families have for the freedom they have here, and their desire to see this same level of independence and liberty be the standard for Ukraine as well is inspiring.  Even the kids, as young as third and fourth grade, are experts on the United States Constitution!  Imagine that.  

Ukraine is, in its war against Russia, fighting for freedom and democracy, not just for its own people, but for all of us.  They are building a nation using our ideals and principles, modeled after our democracy, including an almost identical system of justice and courts, which are the front line in any government that is still in its infancy and feeling its way toward maturity as a free and independent nation.  Ukraine has grown and matured in its politics and in its development as a democracy because of its admiration for the United States, and for its neighbors in the European Union.  And in an alliance with Europe and the United States, it would not be a "vassal state" as it was during its long history of being under the dominance of Russia.  

If Ukraine wins, and it is looking more and more every day like that will be the outcome of the war, it will be a win for constitutional democracy.  It should not be seen as an "anti-Russian" achievement, but a pro-democratic achievement.  Ukraine is not looking to be an outpost for the European Union or NATO, aligned against Russia, or a place for the United States to strategically arm itself against Russia, but an independent country with a bright future because it has the ability and the means to develop its natural resources for the benefit of its people.  It does not appear that Ukraine is interested in conquest or acquisition of territory or resources.  

There is a sizeable Russian-speaking minority in the country, precisely because it was a political part of Russia for so long, that the borders were more provincial boundaries than national borders.  So Russians, seeking economic opportunities especially in the defense industry based in Crimea, or in the industrial Donbas region, moved in and were comfortable.  If Ukraine is a democracy, and its people enjoy constitutionally protected rights, that means its Russian speaking minority will be treated the same.  At least, that appears to be the intention of the Ukrainian government.  

So yes, as long as there is a war going on in Ukraine, I am in solidarity with the Ukrainian people who are fighting for their independence and their freedom.  I will keep the flag draped on my bookshelf, the small one on my desk, and I will make it known when I wear gold and blue, that it is in honor of Ukraine and its people.  

I am a Ukrainian.  I hope most Amreicans feel the same way.  

 

Now it's Two Conservative Christian Denominations Struggling to Deal With Sexual Abuse by their Clergy While Catholics are Still Dealing With it

Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) Rejects Sexual Abuse Solotions, Female Clergy 

There is a whole lot of concern, much of it based on false presumptions, about how America's youth are being "groomed" to accept sexual perversion.  But here is yet another Christian denomination dealing with a huge, and relatively under-reported problem, of sexual abuse by pastors, church staff members and volunteers in churches.  Routine background checks aren't enough to stop what is, by the numbers being reported, an epidemic in churches.  We've had the scandal perpetuated by Catholic clergy for decades just now coming to light.  In 2019, the scope of sexual abuse of women in the Southern Baptist Convention was exposed by The Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express News, resulting in a reluctant investigation and slow progress in coming to a resolution of the problem.  

Now, the PCA, Presbyterian Church in America, has turned down possible solutions for dealing with the problem in their churches, and, like the Southern Baptists, decided to make their headlines in a different way.  They rejected, yes rejected four proposals to curb the sexual abuse problem they are facing, which is apparently at least as bad, propotionately, to that of the Southern Baptists, which was a slap in the face to the victims of abuse in their churches.  Then, one slap was apparently not enough.  They went ahead and approved, on the first try, a proposal forbidding women to serve in churches using the title "pastor," "deacon," or "elder".  

It seems that the better way to protect children from "grooming," and from outright abuse, is to keep them away from the Catholic Church, Southern Baptist churches and conservative, PCA Presbyterian churches.  Could it be that the attitude the leadership of these denominations is displaying about the sexual abuse happening in their churches, in which over 80% of the victims are women, is directly connected to their attitude rejecting the spiritual leadership of women in their churches?  

A few invididuals, and at least one organized "faction" among Southern Baptists is grumbling and muttering about churches calling female staff members and giving them responsibility for pastoral leadership as some kind of "slippery slope feminism" beginning to manifest itself in some churches.  And there's been some open insinuation that the women who were victims of abuse in Southern Baptist churches who have come forward and exposed their abusers are doing so as a way to push this feminism into the denomination.  A few have suggested that the investigation into sexual abuse in the SBC is a satanic attack on "good men preaching the gospel."  

What this is, plain and simple, is old fashioned misogyny.  These women in the churches where this is happening are not feminists, by any stretch of the imagination.  They are victims of attitudes fostered by ignorance based on cultural biases leading to the complete mis-interpretation of the scriptures.  

This isn't just about the abuse itself, which is bad enough.  It is also about the manner in which the victims have been treated afterward.  In both denominations, survivors of abuse have related horror stories about being accused of causing the abuse themselves, doubting their integrity and their truthfulness.  In the PCA, when accusations are made before the church court, it has been reported that presbyteries put survivors through a "procedural grinder" that some say was worse than the abuse itself.  In one high profile case in the Southern Baptist convention, a victim reported being "broken down" by a seminary official from the perspective that her abuser may not have been entirely at fault.  

And in all three denominations, since no female clergy are allowed, whenever there is a reported case of sexual abuse, the church officials responsible for handling it will always be men.  That includes any pastoral counseling and follow up to minister to the victims.  In many cases, the lack of professional training is appalling, and the victims are treated as pariahs.  At this year's Southern Baptist Convention, during a break-out session designed to help churches minister to victims of abuse, a victim testified that she was treated as an outcast by the church leadership, put through the whole spectrum of emotions and made to feel guilty about "causing" the abuse while her abuser was allowed to go through a relatively quick process of "repentance and restoration" and was welcomed back into the church.  

It's the far right element in these churches and denominations, influenced by secular, right wing politics and the bigotry that accompanies it, that is causing somthing that should be taken seriously to be turned into another "us vs. them" intrusion of feminism, or a tool of some other liberal ideology to take over the churches.  The problem is that the far right political element is the real spiritual enemy, and is, as the Apostle Jude called it, an "intrusion of licentiousness" into the church, preventing it from functioning in its ministry and hujacking it for political purposes. 

There is no light at the end of the tunnel in the now decades long abuse scandal in the Catholic Church.  Parish after parish, diocese after diocese has long lists of victims abused by clergy, and long lists of clergy who committed abuse.  The lawsuits and settlements are endless.  As Southern Baptists have finally taken a few steps toward resolving the abuse problem in their denomination, after fighting over who would do the investigation and finally having the messengers at the annual meeting themselves override the wishes of the leadership and opt for an outside investigative firm, it has been discovered that hundreds of cases of abuse reported to executive leaders at the SBC offices in Nashville, and in its state convention affiliates, were never investigated at all, and were simply held in file cabinets.  Leaders claimed that the "independence and autonomy" of the churches prevented further action, though that same "independence and autonomy" was something they were more than willing to set aside in order to impose their ban on women serving in pastoral ministry.  

Apparently, PCA has also been stymied in its ability to figure out what to do.  But they, too, showed no hesitation at all when it came to banning women from pastoral ministry.  And what these actions show is that there is really no spiritual leadership, no dependence on God, no attention being paid to what they claim they believe is his written, authoritative, inerrant, infallible word.  

For such boasters are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.  And no wonder!  Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.  So it is not strange if his ministers disguise themselves as ministers of righteousness. Their end will match their deeds.--The Apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians 11:13-15, 

NOTE:  Within the Catholic Church, the Southern Baptist Convention and the Presbyterian Church in America are genuine Christians who have been rightly grieved by what has been done under their roof and in their name.  Their appointed and elected leadership, because of the obstacles presented by their rigid approach to doctrine and practice, has prevented them from acting in a manner wholly consistent with their belief in the gospel of Jesus Christ, centered in the Bible, and their reliance on prayer, which brings the presence of God's Holy Spirit and true healing and peace.  There are those, in all three of these denominations, who are geniunely caring for victims of abuse, working to reform bad policies and practices which cover it up, allow abusers to be passed on to the next unwitting congregation and who treat the victims as second class members.  

At the SBC's meetings in 2021 and 2022, in Nashville and Anaheim, respectively, messengers themselves overwhelmingly forced unwilling leadership to give up their grip on power and wrested responsibility for handling the sexual abuse crisis in their denomination away from the bureaucrats, putting it in the hands of a task force which includes three women, one an attorney, the other two with extensive counseling experience in the area of sexual abuse.  Among the other members of the group include a pastor who has been actively engaged in racial reconciliation, a pastor who is a certified sexual abuse counselor, and the other members are pastors who have led the movement to take this away from the bureaucracy and put it in the hands of competent, caring people.  It has taken a while to get it to this point, five years since the newpapers first exposed the depth of the crisis, but it is now in the hands of a group that is not part of the denominational power structure, bureacracy and "good ole boy club,".  

Within the Catholic Church, there is a clear movement involving clergy and members to clean up the problem instead of nipping around the edges to protect the church finances.  Some Catholics realize that restoring victims to their faith is more important than avoiding lawsuits or hiding problems under the rug, so to speak.  They, too, are taking responsibilty for the emotional health of victims of abuse in the church.  And of course, since many of the victims aren't inclined to turn to the church for help, since their experience has been anything but helpful, much of this has to be done by reaching out and working outside the boundaries defined by ministry.  

The two churches that were stripped of their affiliation with the Southern Baptist Convention because of having women serving in pastoral ministries are moving forward.  Saddleback Valley Church, in Orange County, California, was already the largest church in the Southern Baptist Convention, and this has been hardly a blip on the radar screen as far as its ministry is concerned.  It succeeds because it focuses on a Christian mission and purpose, and its leadership has wisely avoided engaging in politics, leaving that up to each member.  Fern Creek is in a place where members from oppressed--and I use that term intentionally--churches will find their way to its doorstep.  There are several churches in the Louiville area that cut ties with the SBC over its credalism of the past couple of decades, who have women in pastoral ministry roles in their church and several others, still affiliated with the SBC, on the "hit list" for action at the next convention, who say they will make no changes to the way they do ministry.  Both churches already have company among a growing group of former Southern Baptist churches who have voluntarily severed ties and which have experienced no ill effects as a result.  





Southern Baptists "Put the Nail in Their Own Coffin," Says Retired Virginia Pastor

Southern Baptists Just Put the Nail in Their Own Coffin 

Retired Virginia Pastor Dave Roberts says that by dismissing churches with females designated as "pastors" from its membership, the Southern Baptist Convention subtracted 57,000 members from its rolls, but in the bigger picture, with this move "put the nail in their own coffin."  I agree with him 100%.  

Roberts mentions that he was personally troubled by the fact that the Southern Baptist Convention was formed when it split off from its fellow Baptists in the north over the appointment of slave owners as missionaries.  Slavery is a sin, a grievous one, and the approval of it by Christians of any kind, and specifically Baptists who claim to believe in the authority and inerrancy of the Bible, was based on a very faulty interpretation of scripture.  The entire denomination was wrong, but it took more than a 150 years for that error to be acknowledged and admitted.  

The error was perpetuated as the "Lost Cause" myth was incorporated into church teaching and practice, and the denomination became a sort of "pseudo-Confederacy" in preserving antebellum culture and staunchly embracing racial segregation.  In fact, Roberts mentions that Southern Baptists failed to reunite with their fellow Baptists in the North, not because the northerners were more "liberal," but because they advocated for school desegregation.  So it is that today, Baptists in the United States are still divided, along ideological and racial lines, with the Southern Baptists being predominantly white, and mostly in the southern states, though they now have affiliated churches in all 50 states, the National Baptists being the second largest Baptist group, made up of predominantly African American churches, and the American Baptist Churches, USA, which is the original Triennial Convention, and is very diverse in its distribution of churches and the ethnicity of its membership.  

Roberts says that a third error made by the denomination, setting it on the road to its own destruction, was the "Conservative Resurgence" which was a takeoever of the seminaries and mission boards, started in 1979.  Whatever "Christlike spirit" might have been present in Southern Baptist life prior to that, and along with it, interest and motivation in missionary enterprises, gave way to attacks on professors in seminaries, name calling, labelling and pushing out of those who disagreed with turning the Baptist Faith and Message into a creed, and destroyed any hope of spiritual renewal within the denomination, says Roberts.  

Throwing out churches who have designated females as "pastors" is an extended result of the Conservative Resurgence, and of turning the Baptist Faith and Message into a creed.  Historically, Baptists are identified by their statements of faith which were intentionally not creeds, and by the statement, "no book but the Bible, no creed but Christ".  So turning the Baptist Faith and Message into a statement of "doctrinal accountability," which is the language used by the Conservative Resurgence leadership, has become as big an error in interpreting the Bible as was made when the denomination determined it would support slavery and appoint slave owners as missionaries.  

And I say Roberts' experience is similar to mine, as well as to thousands of others who have exited the Southern Baptist Convention over the past couple of decades, an exodus that has resulted in the loss of over 3 million members, and 1.7 million in the weekly church attendance of what was once trumpeted as "the largest Protestant denomination in the United States."  Formally, that designation might still be correct, but non-denominational Evangelicals, along with the churches of the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements, far outnumber Southern Baptists now, even though they, too, are not seeing numerical growth over the past decade.

I predict that the numerical decline will increase in size, as a number of churches who have women serving in positions called "pastor" have been put on a hit list for referral to the credentials committee at the next annual meeting.  Some of them say they are not affiliated with the SBC any more, and haven't been for a while, which is likely, since most churches don't make a formal announcement when they "leave" the SBC, they just stop contributing to its ministry causes.  It is likely that an additional 4 to 5 million members may be in churches that have already informally stopped contributing, given the discrepancy between the reported membership of 13 million, and the regular, weekly church attendance figure of just under 4 million (which includes a million who attend church via "online" services).  

So the nation's "largest Protestant denomination" is, in just a couple of decades since the Conservative Resurgence, about half the size it was in 1979 when the conservatives took over.  That tells you how successful they have been in poisoning the well.  


Saturday, June 24, 2023

Will We Ever Recover From This Political and Ideological Mess?

Those Who Fail to Learn From History are Doomed to Repeat It

Every succeeding human generation tends to think it has mastered and conquered the problems of its past, the things that led to hatred, war, destruction, the stunted growth of cultures and societies and nations, the evil that led human beings, who are theoretically the most intelligent beings on the planet, to torture and murder each other and bring down each other's civilizations because they were perceived as weak and inferior.  And yet here we are, in the United States of America, in the twenty-first century, with serious problems that have the potential to bring down our 247 year old democracy.  

As time passes, humans are supposed to learn from their past, to understand mistakes and figure out how to make things better.  Our history has not been perfect, by any stretch of the imagination.  In fact, reading through any honest history that hasn't been whitewashed for textbook presentation to students in school will show that not much was different in our history than that of anywhere else in the world.  The native population and civilization that was already here was attacked, brutalized, and virtually wiped out because of a technological disadvantage, not because it was inferior.  Unity was achieved in the patchwork of colonies based on the common pursuit of wealth, and the ability to take advantage of being separated from world powers by the width of the Atlantic Ocean.  

Virtually every war we have fought has involved greed, and the quest for wealth.  The world wars of the twentieth centuty were about economic power, haves vs. have nots, who fixes the currencies, who controls the markets, who controls the exploitation of the resources of underdeveloped continents, and protecting our own interests under the guise of keeping ourselves safe from invasion and conquest by using invasion and conquest.  That has all been mixed with some form of idealism based on the hope that human intellect does learn from its mistakes, and that we can do better, both as a nation and as a people in the world.   

But I don't want to sound too cynical.  There are many bright spots in our idealism which has, in many  cases, reached its goals or at least, moved in the right direction toward them.  There's always resistance, prejudice and bigotry have their influence and consequences, but the fact of the matter is that we do live in a free society, we have a functioning democracy which, in spite of its flaws, does reflect the will of the people and it has made a lot of progress toward the lofty goals of its idealism.  

We have emerged from past threats intact, and having learned from our mistakes and the mistakes of others.  Looking back from the vantage point of a history textbook, the success that we have experienced in turning back challenges to our freedom were not as certain in their outcome as they seem to us now.  In fact, there were times when the successful outcome of a crisis was in doubt right up to the moment that it ended, and the resolution of the problems that causes the crisis also not certain, even after the critical moments were passed.  

During the Civil War, there were many times that an outcome guaranteeing the United States would remain intact, and that freedom would be won, was in serious doubt.  Anyone who has been to the Gettysburg battlefield knows about the copse of trees which are a physical "high water mark of the Confederacy," and that a series of small events which took place over the course of three days changed the entire outcome of the war in what were the darkest days for the cause of preserving the union and freedom.  

This is a Mess Made by the Conservative Right Wing

Claiming tyranny, but bending constitutional minority protections into unrecognizeable shape for their own political benefit, Republicans have created the current political mess.  There is no tyranny, in that they can't point to a single constitutional right or individual freedom that they have been denied under the leadership of Democrats when they have controlled Congress and the Presidency.  Not one legitimate example.  They seem very angry that people who don't think and act like prosperous, white, religious fundamentalists have rights and can go about their business, and make their choices with the same degree of freedom as everyone else, but they have not experienced tyranny, either by the technical definition of the work, or in any other way. 

I frequently use Jefferson's way of explaining what true freedom looks like as an example. 

"It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god.  It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

That's a challenge, by the way, if I didn't hint at it strongly enough.  Go ahead.  Point out, specifically, where any conservative, or extremist right wing radical has had their pocket picked or their leg broken because they have a neighbor who is atheist, believes that life doesn't begin at conception, believes that global warming is real, believes that people have the right to express their sexual identity or gender orientation, believes that God inhabits a distant planet called Kolob with his millions of celestial wives, believes that life is a cycle of the forces of good and evil, or thinks Bernie Sanders would make an excellent President of the United States.  

I'll state this in as clear and concise a manner as I know how.  Tyranny, by definition, does not exist in the United States of America for prosperous, white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, English speakers.  So the overwhelmingly white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, English speaking mob who violently attacked police in order to over-run the Capitol and attempt a coup to overturn the provisions of the peaceful transfer of power in the Constitution were enemies of the United States, not American patriots defending the country against tyranny.  

Oh, and by the way, in case anyone was wondering.  When other people exercise their constitutional right to free expression, they are not "jamming" their perspective down anyone's throat.  But when conservatives push legislation making matters of conscience matters of law instead, they are, indeed, jamming their views down the throats of those who do not accept their worldview or their bigotry and prejudices.

Let's talk about having something jammed down our throat, like businesses celebrating and acknowledging pride month.  Does resistance to libs and cancel culture permit boycotts of those businesses because they're "jamming" the freedom of persons of LGBTQ orientation down our collective throats?  Then let's have a conversation about businesses which celebrate Christmas.  Isn't that doing the same thing, jamming Christianity down the throats of those who are not Christians?  This is America, where our idealism and coincidentally, our intellect, should recognize, and at the very least tolerate, someone else's right to free expression.  The commercialization of Christmas, which should offend most Christians, is far more invasive than pride month. 

No one is compelled to participate in pride week or Christmas, though the commercial celebration of Christmas, by a long shot, is far more offensive to true Christianity and invasive of the rights of those who don't celebrate it in such a commercial way, than pride week.  There is no law compelling participation in either event and someone with reasonable intelligence can figure out the best way to exercise their own freedom is don't participate in it.  There's no tyranny involved.  

What Have Americans Had to Endure Under Conservative Control? 

Liberals tend to be much more patient and much more accepting of a culture in which true freedom of consicence exists.  True freedom cannot exist in a culture where individuals or groups are persecuted because they are different.  Americans have always been part of a struggle for true liberty, which we have not yet attained and likely never will.  The whole idea behind the Constitution was to limit the powers of government in order to protect individual freedom of conscience.  Laws should be written to protect us from, in Jefferson's terms, having our pocket picked or our leg broken.  In other words, they establish the boundaries of infringement.  But they should not infringe upon the rights to freedom of conscience or the free expression of any Americans because they are part of a racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, or social minority.  

Being "American" means accepting its ideals, not assimilating into the cultural majority.  One of the most patriotic Americans I know was my university Civics professor, a native born American citizen whose parents were from Jordan, who knew the Constitution like the back of her hand, because she loved the freedom that she had here, and appreciated it.  

But after making some progress when Democrats have controlled Congress and the Presidency, we are clearly moving in a much different direction now.  As Republicans have had to build their constituencies from more conservative elements of the culture, including the more conservative, fundamentalist and Pentecostal/Charismatic wings of far right Christianity, along with more radical, anti-government hate groups, white supremacists, neo-Nazis and the whole array of conspiracy theorists, we have seen a clear erosion of acceptance and tolerance, and a sharp increase of anti-semitism, mass shootings and gun violence which is almost always perpetrated by a far right winger. 

This has predictably produced chaos. 

  • We saw a group of anti-government insurrectionists follow the lead of the President of the United States in attacking the Capitol during the joint session of Congress certifying the electoral votes, based on the provable lie that the election had been "stolen" through massive voter fraud.  No such evidence was ever produced, but radical right wingers who don't pay attention to current events were easily swayed by a politician who opened the door to their destructive hatred. 
  • We saw, in four years, the government run up 25% of the total debt it has accumulated throughout its entire history.  Yes, 25% in just four years under a Republican administration from a party that has done nothing but whine about spending and the debt for four decades.  And for what?  To give tax cuts to the 1% of Americans who are bribing their way to an oligarchy of the rich.  
  • We are no strangers to corruption in the legal system.  But we now have three Supreme Court justices, all far-right wing conservatives, all Republican appointees, who have scoffed at and ignored ethics in accepting what amounts to bribes from rich petitioners who have cases pending in front of the court.  
  • We have endured four years of a President's corruption that included the expectation of favorable treatment for himself from appointees to the federal courts, justice department and FBI.   
  • We have seen a sharp rise in attacks on minority groups, including deadly attacks on Jewish synagogues, on Muslims, on gays and lesbians, and, perhaps because they are most vulnerable and the terrorist aspect of the attacks get a lot of attention, on our children while they are in school.  This is a legacy of far right wing Republicanism that they will never, ever live down.  
  • We have seen the appointment of known subversive anarchist advocates to positions in the White House under the previous Republican President.  
  • The voting rights act was dismantled by this conservative Supreme Court, along with Roe v. Wade.  
  • Another legacy of the extreme right wing of the GOP running amok is Citizens United, which has corrupted elections with a flood of money from the corporate rich in their attempt to buy influence and power in Congress and the Presidency.  Their money elected the 45th President of the United States and bought most of his administration. 
  • The Russian oligarchy and its dictator successfully interfered in an American Presidential election.  
Oh, I could go on, but that would be depressing.  The real question here is not to rehash the lowest points of the Republican party in its history, and it has hit bottom before, but not like this.  The question is, how do we stop this and how will we ever recover from it?  

Paralized by Polarization

The brightest spots in the 21st century history of American Democracy have come during the Presidential administrations of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.  These two Presidents, who will go down in history as being among the best, have managed some colossal achievements in the face of Republican opposition and obstructionism.  We have the first framework for actual health care reform which bears the name of the President who pushed it into place.  "Obamacare" was a term of derision used by Republicans but it is still there, still in place, still helping millions of Americans have access to health care they wouldn't have otherwise.  So yes, call it Obamacare.  

The chapter on the Biden Administration is still being written, and along with his legislative accomplishments during a window of Democratic party control of Congress, is the fact that his administration is a bulwark against the anti-patriotic, anti-American stance of the bigots and anarchists that make up the core of the MAGA movement.  He is helping to restore, as best he can, the damage that was done in just four years of the Trump administration.  

I don't expect that there will be a quick turnaround in the thinking of those who have become caught up in the anti-patriotic, un-American MAGA movement or the subversive white supremacists, conspiracy theorists and anarchists that direct its movements.  That kind of dark, negative ideology lasts a long time.  We're still dealing with the effects of the racism and hatred that spewed out of the old Confederacy after Reconstruction was brought to an end.  But we can keep it from spreading, growing, and render it ineffective in achieving its goals.  I do have a few suggestions. 

1.  The former President must be brought to justice, not only for stealing classified documents, or in business fraud or civil sexual assault cases, but for charges of seditious conspiracy and inciting insurrection on January 6th, 2021.  

Laying out the mountain of evidence that exists which shows him to be an un-American traitor to this country and its ideals and convicting him of the real crimes he committed, along with whatever consequence that involves, preferably spending the rest of his life in prison, will affirm the fact that American Democracy is here to stay, and will prevail.  Frankly, that doesn't look political at all, it looks like real justice. 

2.  All Americans who have seen this for what it is, must make a commitment to use the tools that Democracy gives them, which are free expression and THE BALLOT BOX!  

All elections matter.  And that's all I need to say about it.  

3.  The public education system, from pre-Kindergarten to the graduate level of colleges and universities, need to experience major reform in civics education.  

Along with high level reading skills, excellent writing skills and top notch math performance, civics education, "social studies" if you will, needs to undergo major reform as a required subject for all students every year of their education.  American History should be taught, correctly and factually, not as mythology, every year that a student is in elementary or high school.  Three of the four years of the high school curriculum should involve a segment of American history, and one full year of American Government, including a requirement that students pass, with a score of 80% or higher, a comprehensive exam on the U.S. Constitution.  Credit hours in American history and government should be pre-requisites for any college degree program.  And we need to train our best teachers in history and government.  

Ignorance is the real enemy.  It will take more than a generation to get rid of the evil that has infiltrated our society and culture.  We must always be proactive and on the lookout for an invasion of ideology intended to destroy us from within.  And the only cure for ignorance is education.  



Friday, June 23, 2023

Abuse Survivor Says "Not Even the Minimum" Progress Made in Southern Baptist Sexual Abuse Resolution

Christa Brown: "Little Progress on Sexual Abuse by the Southern Baptist Convention 

The Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express News, following information given to them by victims of sexual assault committed by pastors and ministerial staff members of Southern Baptist Churches, dug up information and published an investigative report in February of 2019 which exposed a scandal involving more than 700 victims of sexual abuse by clergy of Southern Baptist churches.  The expose, called Abuse of Faith, came at a time when victims of the abuse in Southern Baptist churches had been extremely frustrated in getting anyone to listen to them or to help them.  

Southern Baptists are known for having a touch of self-righteous arrogance when it comes to the image they have of themselves as theological and doctrinal conservatives which, in their mind, confirms them as being closer to God than other denominations who don't belive the Bible the way they do.  Among their ranks are plenty of pastors who have been vitriolic and caustic in their criticism of Catholics, and the sex abuse scandal among their clergy.  Things like this, in the minds of many Southern Baptist leaders and church members, too, serve as confirmation that they are more correct on Biblical hermeneutics than anyone else, and more blessed by God because of their conservatism.  

So this expose, which is just the tip of the iceberg of sexual abuse within the SBC, as we have seen since it was first published, came as a major shock, and it has created a crisis as big as any the denomination has faced in its existence, including the "battle for the Bible" which prompted the Conservative Resurgence takeover beginning in 1979.  Finally, thought many of the victims of sexual abuse committed by Southern Baptist clergy of churches where they were faithful members, justice will be done.  

But not quite yet.  

They've spent money on an investigation, set up an "Abuse Reform Implementation Task Force," which is a typical method used by the Southern Baptist bureaucracy to appear that they are doing more than they really are doing, and rolled out a model for a database which will include the names of sex abusers, theoretically so that churches have a means to find out information that might go unnoticed when an abuser is ready to move on to the next church in the world of independent, autonomous churches that is the SBC.  But according to Christa Brown, a victim of abuse at the hands of a Southern Baptist pastor who has been calling for accountability within the convention for as long as anyone has been, it's not even the minimum expected progress since it finally got the attention of the convention in 2019, in two major daily newspapers in Texas.  

"This is not meaningful progress," said Brown, describing the database rollout in which not a single abusers name was listed.  

Kicking Out Churches With Female Pastors Grabbed the Headlines

"A draconian purge of women pastors sucked all the oxygen out of the convention hall this year and caused abuse reform to recede into the background," said Brown.  

The number of churches affiliated with the Southern Baptist convention who have a female in a position that uses the title "pastor" is extremely small.  In fact, only two churches faced expulsion at this year's convention for violating this nebulous part of the denomination's doctrinal statement, the Baptist Faith and Message.  The expose in the Chronicle identified around 700 victims of clergy abuse in Southern Baptist churches, and included only those cases where the findings were indisputable.  

But, other than a blistering argument over requiring members of the executive committee to waive privilege when it came to the investigation, whining over how much the investigation cost and the use of a law firm that wasn't connected to the denomination, for good reason, which didn't share some of its religious superstition and bigotry, along with undermining the whole thing, including the victims who have come forward, by attacking their credibility and character and planting the false idea that this is some kind of feminist, satanic attack on good men who pastor churches, little attention or interest has been paid by those individuals who make a regular habit out of attending annual meetings.  It's almost as if they are saying, "look, here, now at least we're doing something, so go sit down and be quiet," to the victims.  

Nor did the fact that the Southern Baptist convention's churches losing 3 million members in a decade, 450,000 in just one year, get much of their attention.  They wanted the headlines to focus on their arbitrary and ecclesiastical authoritarian dictation of doctrine to local churches, kicking out its largest and most evangelistic congregation, Saddleback Valley Church in California, because it has ordained women who serve on the staff.  They didn't want the focus on the sexual abuse scandal nor on the fact that their membership and attendance is now declining faster than the "liberal" mainline Protestants, whom they claim are losing members because they are liberal.  

Attack on Women in the Pastorate and Abuse Victims is the Same Misogyny

The attack on churches who call women to serve in pastoral ministry roles in vocational ministry, and the minimizing and downplaying of the sexual abuse problem within the denomination--and it is a scandal and a problem of significant proportions for the Southern Baptist Convention--comes from the same ideology, a belief that women are inferior to men and should have a subservient role in the church.  There is no biblical justification or support for that perspective if a proper, contextual interpretation of the New Testament is used.  

The expose in the Chronicle and Express-News forced the SBC's cumbersom, favor-driven bureaucracy to deal with the abuse scandal and its victims in spite of wanting to sweep it all under the rug and continue to hide behind local church autonomy.  And so it has, reluctantly, with loud caterwauling and complaining, residual casualties of the fight that ensued including about 18 executive committee members who resigned rather than submitting to the will of the convention messengers to waive privilege, Ronnie Floyd, a long-time sycophantic, wannabee who waited and bided his time until he worked his way into position to be picked as CEO of the executive committee, only to resign two years later over the waiver of privilege issue, with which he did not want to comply, and Russell Moore, director of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, which took up the sexual abuse cause as a convention resolution had instructed.  

I would not guess that any of the current victims of sexual abuse at the hands of Southern Baptist clergy will ever be treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.  SBC leadership, for the most part, will continue to resist the will of the convention messengers, drag their feet on completing ministry benefits for victims, and attempt to use the power of the convention apparatus to get their way or help their body.  Those members, and perhaps even entire congregations, who do not see eye to eye on women's roles in local church ministry with the absolute position that the SBC has taken will join the stream of members obviously leaving for varous other reasons.  

The Influence of Extreme Right Wing Politics is Corrupting the Southern Baptist Convention

These happenings are all symptoms of a long term influence of right wing politics on the Southern Baptist Convention.  The fight against churches who consider women as equal members and partners in ministry has been going on for a very long time is caused not only by the influence of fundamentalist Baptists using an errant method of incorrectly interpreting a few passages of scripture that reflect a local, cultural perspective of women in a literal sense, leaving out multiple, corroborating passages which support the equality of women in the church, but by the influence of a political misogyny, bias against women in leadership, that comes from more extreme, far right American politics.  So the Southern Baptist Convention has arrived at a point where it kicks churches out of its fellowship for considering women as qualified for ministry, and it pushes back and criticizes victims in high visibility sexual abuse cases, and drags its feet in providing a solution to the problem of abuse in the denomination. 

In 2019, in Birmingham, the influence of some of the African American pastors of SBC churches turned back an attempt at passing a far-right wing resolution, brought into the convention by political influences from outside the denomination, which would have condemned the use of Critical Race Theory altogether.  The version that some messengers attempted to pass, contained false statements and misinformation offensive to its ethnic members.  If it had passed in its original form, it would have been a Christian denomination publishing a lie.  Fortunately, even though the modified version was still prejudicial, and representative of the kind of racism which characterizes right wing politics in the United States this century, the convention managed to avoid a total disaster.  Though resolutions cannot be undone once a convention annual meeting has closed, there have still been attempts to put something on the record showing SBC support for a radical view of CRT that is racist in its origins and anti-Biblical in its practice. 

Convention-watchers are also waiting to see what the Executive Committee does with regard to replacing its CEO, Dr. Ronnie Floyd, who resigned after just two years of service, because of the crisis surrounding waiving privilege in the sexual abuse investigation.  Floyd quit rather than follow the overwhelmingly approved directive of the messengers in the annual meeting.  His position was temporarily filled by Dr. Willie McLaurin, a Tennessee pastor and former staff member of the Tennessee Baptist Convention who came to the Executive Committee of the SBC as Vice President for Great Commission Relations and Mobilization.

McLaurin is African American, and has done an excellent job, according to multiple observers and individuals in the SBC bureaucracy.  However, the search committee bypassed him and set up one of their own members for the job, which the Executive Committee turned away overwhelmingly.  McLaurin would be the first person of color to serve in an executive capacity in any of the SBC's entities in the entire history of the denomination.  Up to this point, every executive leader has been a white male.  Only once, in 2012, at an annual meeting in New Orleans, was an African American elected president of the Southern Baptist Convention.  

So the bigger picture here is that the influence of far-right wing Republican politics, which has been wrapped up in the Southern Baptist Convention since well before Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority and Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition ever came on the scene, has corrupted its Biblical values and Christian worldview.  It struggles agains the influence of the aberrant, uninformed literalism of fundamentalists and the conspiracy theories, misogyny and racism of far right Republicanism.  Its roots in the old Confederate States of America still pull against the principles and ideals of the gospel of Jesus Christ.  

For certain intruders have stolen in among you, people who long ago were designated for this condemnation as ungodly, who pervert the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.  Jude, V. 4

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

One American's Perspective: Justice Should Not be Delayed

The images from coverage of the January 6, 2021 Trump Insurrection and attack on the United States Capitol will be as vivid and clear in my mind for the rest of my life as the images of the planes attacking the World Trade Center on September 11.  The date will also be burned into my memory, just like September 11, and like December 7, 1941 was for the older generation.  

Just like September 11, and the December 7 attack on Pearl Harbor, the country was under a violent attack from extremists aimed at destroying our constitutional democracy.  It became clear, as the attack progressed, that the members of Congress were the target of the mob that would have murdered anyone the got their hands on, and there's no doubt about that.  They were following the orders of their leader, who was doing everything within his power to avoid the consequences of losing an election his fragile ego would not let him believe he had lost.  

They were there to defend him and his ego against the will of the American people, its Constitution, its government and every ideal that it stands for .  They were the enemy, engaged in a seditious attempt to overthrow the legitimately elected President and Congress and impose a dictatorship on the United States.  In doing so, they collectively committed a crime of incredible proportions, the attempted overthrow of a government.  

They didn't spontaneously gather there on January 6th with the idea in their head that attacking the Capitol and disrupting the electoral vote count would change the outcome of an election that had already been confirmed and certified.  This was carefully planned in advance and those who showed up to be the foot soldiers were recruited, organized and placed under the command of terrorists already chosen and given specific orders and instructions, Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, heavily armed and already at the Capitol while the rest of the insurrectionists were at a rally at the White House, with plans laid out of which entrances to breach, and where to go.  

The magnitude of evil in that crime will go down in history as one of the worst ever perpetrated against the United States government.  It was as much an enemy attack as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, or the Confederacy firing upon Ft. Sumter.  

Congress, which had been the primary target of the attack, got right down to the business of investigating, getting the facts, gathering the evidence and determining who was to blame and what responsibility they should bear for a seditious insurrection against the United States and its people.  The committee did an excellent job, laid out the evidence and made the case that the former President conspired to disrupt the historic and constitutional peaceful transfer of power.  They provided a complete blueprint and framework for the case against the former President and everyone involved in the conspiracy with him.   

It was an attack on the United States that will go down in history along with Pearl Harbor and the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center.  In a nation that values and reveres the rule of law, and in which its democratic government has stood for almost 247 years, this was a crime that should have caused an immediate investigation and the perpetrators and conspirators, including the former President, brought to justice quickly, firmly and decisively.  

In Many Cases, Justice has Come Quickly 

The "foot soldiers" of the insurrection have been brought to justice fairly quickly.  The leaders of the extremist, terrorist groups that followed the plan for attacking the Capitol are facing prison sentences that, for the most part, send the message that the American people will not tolerate insurrection against its government or the Constitution.  I hope that the sentences given to the hundreds of individuals who participated in the violence and destruction, either out of complete ignorance of how democratic government works, or because they were too selfish to care about the rights of others, sent the right message.  Most of those people have also suffered consequences beyond the prison time they are serving.  

But as time has passed, the questions have mounted over why it was taking the Department of Justice so long to gather evidence and build a case against the core of the conspiracy itself, including the former President of the United States.  We've been told, "Cases like this take a long time to prosecute," and "Because of the difficulty in finding a jury that will be fair, the case has to be ironclad and the evidence has to be solid and irrefutable."  And perhaps the most vocal defense of the delay in prosecution has been that the Department "Doesn't want this to appear 'politically motivated.'"  

That didn't really make much sense to me.  Congress had already investigated, and laid out some pretty damning evidence.  We had months of televised hearings.  It was clear that the message being sent was convincing Americans, or at least, a majority of informed Americans with the intelligence, educational background and commitment and dedication to this country, that a serious attempt had been made to overthrow the government, and steps needed to be taken to bring those involved to justice as a means of guaranteeing this never happens again.  

And we were told, time was of the essence.  Most Republican politicians, either because they believe the lies and conspiracy theories, or shake in fear of the former President's political base, would ignore January 6th, opening the door for some foreign enemy, or bigger insurrection, which does not value the individual freedom and equal rights of all Americans, and would leave the crimes that were committed unprosecuted.  That would undermine everything on which our country and its democratic government, rest, including the integrity of elections and the peaceful transfer of power.  And for what?  To defend the lie told by the former President that he didn't lose the election.  So this had to be prosecuted, we were told, before the Republicans and the former President, have a chance to grab the levers of power and never relenquish them.  

Yesterday, stories broke in the news media, including the Washington Post and MSNBC, which indicated that the FBI was reluctant to even move forward with an investigation and the Justice Department was dragging its feet to facilitate the delay.  I get that the language being used is media perspective.  But I'm not the only one who has been waiting, counting the days since January 6th, wondering, as I watch the former President strut his ego out and go about preparations to run for re-election to the Presidency of a government he tried to destroy for his own selfish purposes. 

In fact, what was reported yesterday was that the only reason the Department of Justice has moved to this point, especially on January 6th, is public pressure, generated by those in the news media who have been on top of what's going on and honest enough to report it, like Rachel Maddow and Nicole Wallace and the Washington Post.  Adam Shiff is right.  The DOJ waited far too long to investigate leaders of the effort to overturn the election.  

How can that be justice in a nation that claims to follow the rule of law? 

The Political Label Can't be Escaped so Do the Right Thing

President Biden has done exactly the right thing in this case, by letting the Justice Department and FBI handle this and not directing, controlling or otherwise interferring in their investigation.  This is not a slam on his administration or leadership, but it is a wake up call.  Time is running short, criminals in this particular case are still on the loose and something needs to be done.  There will not be any avoiding this looking political, no matter how it is handled, and no matter the crimes which have been committed.  

Jack Smith has left no doubt that he's the man to handle this job.  And it appears that he is using the power of the Department, and the administration, to put Trump's trial for the classified document theft on a fast track in the court.  They can do that, of course.  I hope he is moving, with equal speed and dispatch, to get the January 6th matter to indictment stage and into the courts so that a verdict can be handed down that is just, and can be executed in time to keep the credibility and good name of the Biden Adminstration in tact, so that he can win a second term in office.  Because that is at stake, whether anyone wants to admit it or not.  

We got great news today about an August date for Trump's trial on his theft of classified documents.  I hope that, with Smith now pushing the investigations regarding January 6th in the DOJ, that we get indictments and a quick trial date for that as well.  Since Congress already investigated, gathered mountains of evidence and laid the whole case out, there's no excuse for the amount of time it has taken for the DOJ to get this to a grand jury, get indictments and get it on to a trial and in spite of all of the good intentions, including not wanting it to "look political," that's not going to be a factor at this point.  

Wray and Garland have some explaining to do. 

The kind of consideration Trump got from the Attorney General in a Democratic presidential administration goes way beyond expectations.  In fact, in spite of all of the talk about no one being above the law, and equal treatment, Trump has received privilege and deference in cases where the crimes he committed were horrific, beyond what any ordinary citizen, and likely beyond what anyone else, even other former Presidents, would have ever received.  I hope he is locked up for the rest of his life for being a traitor to the United States.  But the way this has been handled up to this point, and the fact that he completely got away with the Mueller investigation's findings, which were just as traitorous and criminal, is a sign of his being above the law.  

And that's something that we, the American people, have to fix. 






Sunday, June 18, 2023

How Do These People Get Elected to Congress?

Baptist News Global: Why are "Unhinged" People Elected to Congress

There was a time when I would read or hear about some conspiracy theory circulating around and think, "How ridiculous is that and who would believe something like that?"  History is full of movements founded on the most outrageous lies, fabrications and fears.  But I have always tended to relegate these kinds of things, and the people who push them, to the far fringes of society.  This is, after all, the United States of America, a successful constitutional democracy with a well-informed, educated electorate and because of our past history, safeguarded against the kind of political upheaval that kept Europe in a state of continuous warfare for centuries.  

I'm still capable of recognizing ridiculous fabricatious, outrageous lies and conspiracy theories that motivate people by fear.  But I now see them as a genuine threat to all that we are and all that we have, because I no longer put trust in an educated electorate that relegates the ridiculous to the far fringes of society.  What happens now, to some of the most oulandish and ridiculous fear mongers is that they get elected to Congress.  

The author of the article in Baptist News Global, linked above, is Rodney Kennedy, a pastor in New York and author of the book Good and Evil in the Garden of Democracy, which is on my summer reading list.  Kennedy points to Lousiana Congressman Clay Higgins as an example of the kind of unhinged person now serving in the United States Congress.  Higgins, along with Kari Lake, the losing Republican candidate in the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, and other politicians, including two other Arizona congressmen, Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar, started the war rhetoric when it was announced that the failed former President 45 would be indicted for crimes surrounding his stealing of classified documents that belonged to the National Archives.  

That these people have put significant thought into using violence and force to attempt to overturn the results of elections, and to protect the renegade, rebellious politician who demonstrates his contempt for the Constitution, American values and the democracy that protects our individual freedoms is evident in the code language that they use, and in the open threats that they make.  They are testing the limits of constitutionally-guaranteed free speech in the threats against the government.  Personally, I believe they've crossed into sedition and have made themselves enemies of the people, and the limits need to be consistently enforced.  Unfortunately, it does not seem that there is a mechanism in place to protect our freedoms from these threats, at least, not one that current politicians are willing to use. 

I'm in favor of testing out whatever mechanisms we have, and arresting people when they are clearly inciting violence, using war rhetoric and code language to prompt people to arm themselves and use violence to fight agaist the Constitution and try and prevent justice from taking its course by protecting the criminal who broke the law.  Arrest these people, indict them and set a trial date to let the people decide where the boundary is in breaking the law by inciting insurrection and rebellion against a government empowered by the people.  That will answer the question of whether any of these individuals are qualified to serve in public office, and I'd bet the answer would be a resounding NO!

Higgins has a history of making violent threats, using excessive force and making false statements as a police officer in three different Louisiana jurisdictions and resigned from each police department prior to receiving disciplinary action.  In normal times, normal places, under normal circumstances, a police officer with three resignations for abuse of power wouldn't be a viable candidate for any public office.  But the voters in South Lourisana elected him to Congress.  The use of the violent rhetoric and threats that he posted on social media, which can be interpreted as a call for violence to prevent Trump from facing justice, is, according to Pastor Kennedy, a lifelong pattern for this Congressman.  And it didn't prevent him from being elected, on the contrary, in his district, his behavior appears to be an asset.  

Citing Higgins as one example, Kennedy also references rhetoric from Robert Jeffress, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Dallas, Texas, Kari Lake, who was the defeated gubernatorial candidate in Arizona in 2022 who has repeatedly made false claims about voter fraud, and Marjorie Taylor Greene's reference to a "national divorce."  

I can't say it any better than Kennedy says it: 

"We are dealing with people who will insist that even Jesus said he didn't come to bring peace, but a sword.  The people using this rhetoric are losing all restraint.  They have decided they are so righteous they do not have to tolerate this age.  They believe they have the freedom and the conviction to act on the threat of a civil war.  In their eyes, they are reasonable, sober, honorable people acting on behalf of the good of the nation.  They believe a civil war would usher in a new age. "  

"There's plenty of room for for conservative and liberal points of view," says Kennedy, "But surreptitious calls for civil war go beyond the pale."  

We can no longer relegate these people to the fringes.  They are convincing enough people to believe their lies that they are getting elected to public office with the goal of undermining democracy from within, and using the structure to impose their own rule.  And the danger they pose is significant, since we no longer have an educated electorate capable of keeping the "unhinged" liars from getting into office.  The ideology is using whatever tools it has at its disposal, whether it's Trump's Maga movement or infliltrating fundamentalist churches and using their pulpits.  

They need to be held accountable.  Sedition is sedition, conspiracy is conspiracy.  If one or two of these loudmouths, like Higgins or Lake, or Taylor-Greene, would be arrested for making these remarks, it would stop.

"Higgins may be the tip of the iceberg, and we may be the Titanic," said Kennedy.  "America doesn't need a civil war; we need civil servants who understand civility is still a virtue in working out our disagreements.  We need elected officials with high moral character and credibility who are reliable narrators of democracy."