The False Prophets Hall of Fame Includes Trump, Justice Samuel Alito, Alabama Senator Katie Britt and North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson

Baptist News Global: The False Prophets Hall of Fame

American False Prophets

"All of us--especially those of us who seek to follow Jesus--face a critical decision this year:  Will we choose kindness, joy and justice for all?  Or will we choose the Religious Right's path of violence toward dismantling democracy?  It is imperative that Christians across the country proclaim that these pro-Trump false prophets named to our hall of fame do not speak for Jesus and ask our friends and family to do the same."  Nathan Empsall, Executive Director of Faithful America

Faithful America is a group of American Christians who are calling out Christian nationalism as it has become an intruder in the conservative, Evangelical branch of the American church, including fundamentalists, Pentecostals, Charismatics and the Restoration branch known as the churches of Christ.  They caught my attention when they added the name of the President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Dr. Al Mohler, to their list of false prophets.  

I was raised in a Southern Baptist church and attended a university and a theological seminary that were both affiliated with the denomination.  There was always quite a contrast between what was preached and taught from church pulpits as opposed to what was taught in the classrooms.  There has always been a strong, anti-educational bias among Southern Baptists, a denomination which separated from the larger fellowship of Baptists in the United States, known as the "Triennial Convention," headquartered in Philadelphia, in 1845 over the issue of whether or not slaveowners could be appointed as Baptist missionaries.  

The abolitionist Baptists in the northern states said "NO!"  So, fifteen years before the Civil War broke out, many of the Baptist churches in the states where slavery was legal sent delegations to Augusta, Georgia and broke fellowship with their northern brethren.  Most of the churches in the south were small, and the pastors who served them, sometimes serving more than one at a time because of scarcity, tended to be uneducated, and preached what I call a "populist gospel," in spite of claims that they believed the Bible to be the sole authority for Christian faith and practice.  They had no real idea how to interpret the Bible, knew almost nothing about the context in which it had been written, its history or that of the church, and some of them couldn't even read it.  

The end result of all of that is a Christian faith, codified in doctrinal statements like the Baptist Faith and Message, leading to theological doctrine that incorporates a lot of Southern culture and superstition, a very literal interpretation of the Bible separated from its historical and cultural context, and looking at it as if it is a step by step, verse by verse, "holy rulebook" instead of a historical record of the early church and the core teachings of the Christian gospel. They use their claim that "the Bible is inerrant and infallible," and "God is the same today, yesterday and forever" to support this religious populism that frequently contradicts those very words of Jesus, and his Apostles who also wrote parts of the New Testament.  

At the university I attended, however, the professors cut through the superstition, the literalist interpretation and the Southern populism to the words of scripture in their original language and context.  Four years of college that included a minor in Biblical studies soon separated me permanently from the religious superstition of Southern Baptist doctrine and practice.  Three years in one of their theological seminaries, prior to a purge that was completed in 1989, permanently separated me from the false prophets.  

That university escaped the purge of "liberals" which started in 1979, along with several other universities and colleges whose trustee boards were once elected by state Baptist groups affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, by declaring its trustee board "self perpetuating."  It is no longer a Baptist affiliated school, and as a result, the theology school there has been able to escape the consequences of teaching Christian fundamentalism, and is able to expose the white supremacist foundation and the mysticism and religious superstition which now forms the foundation of Southern Baptist theology.  The theological seminary, unfortunately, belonged to the denomination itself, and endured a cruel purge of its teaching staff, replacing good professors with fundamentalist false prophets.  

Some Form of Christian Nationalism is a Long Running Theme Among Conservative Evangelicals

The combination of a declared belief that the sixty-six books of the Protestant Bible are, as Southern Baptists declare in their doctrinal statement, "a perfect treasure of divine instruction," and a literal, "verse by verse" interpretation of the Bible without consideration of the historical context in which it was written, or the nuances of the ancient languages in which it was written, has produced the various versions of Christian nationalism that have worked their way into far right wing politics via the religious right wing of the GOP.  In the vernacular of Evangelical church culture, the Bible is "The word of God," without error, and infallible.  Little consideration is given to the vast historical context of sixty-six different books, written by 40 different authors over the course of 1,500 years of middle eastern history.  

In spite of what is evidence of fairly accurate preservation of the text of the Bible, there are widespread differences of interpretation when it comes to the relationship between ancient Judaism of the Old Testament and the Christian gospel of the new one.  Most Christian nationalism is based on passages from the Old Testament that recorded words of prophets sent to keep theocratic Israel faithful to its covenant relationship it believed it had with God.  But that same covenant was not offered to any other nation, and in fact, Jesus, in a very definitive statement about the Christian gospel, recorded in Matthew 5:17, claims Messiahship as the fulfillment of that covenant, and is the last heir to the throne of David. 

No political government is offered a theocratic covenant relationship with God.  Jesus did not establish any such thing as a "Christian nation" along the same lines as the Jewish theocracy, initially under a series of Judges, and later, after they demanded one, a monarchy.  The attempts to create "Christian nations" that have followed this very bad interpretation of scripture, have never produced any of the attributes of the Christian faith, evidenced by any values or virtues of the Christian gospel, most notably the grace that is a core characteristic of Christian faith. What they have produced is centuries of the bloodiest warfare the world has ever seen.  

Starting with Constantine and the Edict of Milan in 313, Christians went from being the persecuted to being the persecutors.  The very first clue that a licentious intruder was invading the Christian church should have been Constantine's claim that he saw a cross in the sky, and the words, "By this sign, conquer!"  That was the start of the worst single perversion of the Christian church that the devil ever achieved.  

And the Christian nationalism that is being pushed and promoted in the United States in this twenty-first century is exactly the same perversion and intrusion into the Christian church that happened when Constantine used it to hold on to his political power. It shows none of the attributes, character and virtue that is at the very core of Christian teaching, because it is not Christian.  

The Designation of "False Prophets" is a Correct One

The connection between the Trump Republican party, Project 2025 and Christian nationalism is well established, in spite of his denial of knowledge of anything having to do with it.  That's just an attempt to keep from losing votes and keeping some of his ignorant followers from seeing this for what it is and knowing that this is a danger to the United States.  Virtually all of the far right Evangelical groups that have let Trumpism intrude into their churches are conservative in their theology in exactly the manner in which I have described here.  

It's a very powerful delusion, when one thinks they belong to a group of people that are "chosen" by God, privileged over all of the other people, and that he has called them to the very special task of running the rest of the world.  What that means is that the core values and principles of the Christian gospel can be set aside by this privileged group in order to brutally eliminate opposition of those who were not chosen.  

So the False Prophets Hall of Fame is just calling out those who are developing this mindset and spreading it around in the church.  It is calling attention to those pseudo-Christians who have observed that they get more for themselves out of the worldly power they support than they get when they practice the values and virtues of Christianity, like turning the other cheek or loving their enemies, and they seem to be more satisfied by what they call "worldly power" than they are with some kind of abstract dependence on a God they can't see and seemed to have missed connecting with. 

I challenge readers to do some digging into the Bible, go to Matthew 5:1-11, and then to Galatians 5:22-23, and tell me how many of the virtues and characteristics they see there are observable in Trump, or in any part of his campaign or the Republican party.  They don't seem to notice that the Democrats are beating them in this category hands down and running away.

   

The Truth About the US Exit From Afghanistan: Trump's Negotiations Legitimized the Taliban, Undermined the Democratically Elected Government

 PBS: US Review of Chaotic Afghanistan Withdrawal Blames Trump

U.S. Withdrawal From Afghanistan: Report

The war in Afghanistan, a disastrous misadventure left over from the Bush Administration's incompetence, which cost the United States 2,459 lives, and 20,769 wounded service men and women, should have never happened.  One of several demonstrations of the unbelievable incompetence of George W. Bush in foreign policy, part of his "nation building strategy" that failed miserably, the initial attack on Afghanistan was for the purpose of finding and getting rid of Osama Bin Laden.  

He was never in Iraq, nor were the alleged "weapons of mass destruction" that were the aim of a misguided, and futile, attack on that country.  There are those who say that, in spite of its futility, removing Saddam Hussein from power was worth the trouble.  Looking at the aftermath, which included the rampage of ISIS, the destruction of large swaths of Syria and Kurdistan, and the almost complete wipeout of the few Orthodox Christians left in that part of the world, I say it wasn't worth it.  

The practice of Republican "kicking the can down the road" when it came to these disastrous, expensive, futile efforts at nation building was classic Bush.  And so, the job of extracting the United States from a costly and deadly occupation in Iraq fell to President Obama, as did the task of holding back the Taliban in Afghanistan in order to pursue Bin Laden.  Of course, President Obama being a far more competent leader, succeeded in bringing Bin Laden to justice, where Bush failed.  

At that point, from my own perspective, I wish President Obama had followed the advice of his Vice President and removed the US presence from Afghanistan, as he did from Iraq.  I understand his desire to make the effort to continue to prop up the flailing, corrupt Afghan government, and give democracy there a chance, but the Afghan army was not capable, and perhaps not very willing, either, to hold off the advance of the Taliban.  Democracy in such an anarchic and radically Islamic country never stood a chance.  It was never going to work, and President Obama should have pulled the plug.  

Trump, naturally and eagerly threw himself at the Taliban dictatorship.  These were his kind of people and he relished the thought of being able to undermine the democratically elected government and hand the country over to the Taliban.  Of course, he needed to delay long enough to see if there was some way for him to extract money out of the situation before pulling the rug out from underneath the elected government and giving the country back to a cruel dictatorship and he wasn't capable of understanding the military realities and logistics involved in evacuating literally hundreds of thousands of people from the certain death and execution that would be visited on them if they were caught and left behind.  His withdrawal plan was a disaster and a failure.  

Fortunately, he was succeeded by a competent and seasoned President who had wanted to get us out of Afghanistan all along.  But as the reports indicate, Trump had squandered the necessary time and the necessary territory to bring this to a peaceful and orderly resolution.  Under the circumstances, what our military under Biden's leadership achieved was nothing short of a miracle.  The loss of life, which President Biden had anticipated and developed plans to keep at as much of a minimum as possible, was quite low under the circumstances.  

The Biden Administration executed the withdrawal that can be described as being in spite of the flaws and lack of adequate planning or consideration that was part of the sloppy and incompetent work of his predecessor.  So little consideration had been given to Trump's plan that most of what happened during the withdrawal depended on fast action in the moment.  And as you read the report, you see, Biden left what turned out to be on the spot, emergency planning to his military experts, who managed to carry it out with as little loss of life and as few people left behind as could be expected in spite of Trump's interference and incompetence.  

The end result is that the United States is finally out of Bush's Afghanistan disaster.  We airlifted over 100,000 people out of danger in a matter of a few short weeks.  

It's hard to imagine how much of a disaster that would have been had Trump been in charge.  His habit  of claiming to be the only expert and demanding his orders be followed would have resulted in the unnecessary loss of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of American troops and tens of thousands of Afghan and American civilians who would have been left behind.  His own military advisors have said as much and we know from experience and observation.  

Of course, he preferred the Taliban win over democracy.  Not that Afghanistan's democratically elected government was effective or capable of actually governing the country, which was not suited in any way for democracy, but Trump gravitates to dictatorships.  He knows how to hand dictators all of the advantages, and he gave them like candy to the Taliban, in the same way he did to Kim Jong Un, in North Korea and Putin in Russia.  Birds of a feather, so to speak.  

We don't need more proof of Trump's lack of patriotism, or of his incompetence.  He put the cherry on top of his disdain and disrespect for America's military by the disrespect and disregard he showed toward one of our most sacred monuments to their service by desecrating the Arlington National Cemetery.  Republicans may continue to love their America-hating, dictator-loving, anti-Patriotic nominee for the Presidency, but continuing support for him only shows us that they are as bad as he is.

Christian Support for Harris is Emerging, While Conservatives are Enraged Over It

 Texas Baptist Standard: Texas Lawmaker, Seminarian Opposes Christian Nationalism

There's a core group of Evangelicals, mostly those who have been sucked into the political extremist far right, who believe that voting for a Democrat is incompatible with being a Christian.   

Not only are they wrong about that, at least, if they want to consider what Jesus said and taught and how that forms the basis for interpreting the writings of the Apostles in the New Testament, but I would turn that around, point to the character, not only of Trump, to whom they give unqualified support and with whom they share personal loyalty, but to all of the characteristics that identify his MAGA movement, and claim, in the words of right winger pastor Landon Schott, of Mercy Culture Church, that "you are not a Bible believing, Jesus following Christian if you support the godless, Romans 1 evil of the Democratic Party," changing those last two words to Donald Trump and the godless Republican party. 

If Schott, who I will not call either "mister" or "pastor" wants to go that far in his judgmental assault on Democrats, it opens the door for me to go that far in pointing out that his support for Trump is evidence of what a godless hypocrite he is.  

Jack Graham, pastor of the Prestonwood Baptist Church of Dallas, one of the largest Southern Baptist and Evangelical churches in the country, says he supports Trump because, "He is a warrior for us."  

"He's standing for us and always has been representing the principles and precepts of God's word that we strongly believe," said Graham.  

Which principles and precepts would those be?  Having an affair with a porn star while his wife is pregnant with their child, and then, while she is at home caring for it?  Or publicly shaming three wives to whom he was married, two of whom he divorced to marry the subsequent one, in public, in adulterous affairs that ended each marriage and earned him millions of entertainment dollars.   

Was it the violence he advocated against the Capital and Washington D.C. police, and against the United States Congress on January 6th, which was responsible for 5 deaths and hundreds of injuries?  Is that what these two Texas pastors stand for when they stand with a man whose pathological lying is duplicitous and immoral?  Apparently, that's what they mean when one of them refers to Trump as a "warrior," though I'm having trouble finding where to find the principle or precept in the Bible related to starting insurrections against the civil government that are based on a lie.   

Would it be his direct denial, to prominent Evangelical leaders, claiming that he has done nothing for which he requires God's forgiveness, an antichrist denial of the core principle of Christian conversion, a statement which makes it clear he is not spiritually one of them?  Or is it the direct contradiction of Jesus' teaching to "love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you," in the face of all of this talk about Trump being a "warrior" for Christians of Graham's ilk.

I'd like to know how one can be Christian, claiming to follow the teachings of Christian gospel, and advocate for any form of Christian nationalism, which is a godless, antichristian tyranny that claims it must establish itself through violence, bloodshed and murder.  Can either Schott or Graham answer those questions?  And how do they decide to choose a political leader, when given the choice with their vote, and their influence, who openly denies his need for Jesus as his savior, which the Apostle John calls an "antichrist" in the context of his words found in I John 4:1-3.  It's pretty clear that Trump is not standing with Christians because he shares their convictions.  It's because he needs their votes, and there's a limit on what he'll do to get them.  

Compare and Contrast the Views of Texas Representative James Talarico

From an Evangelical perspective, the words of Jesus are not only authoritative because they were inspired and included in the New Testament, but because they come from a divine source, God himself, who was revealed in the flesh by Jesus.  It does not take much reading, if we begin at Matthew 5, and run through a couple of chapters of the text, which is known as Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, to get this comparison.  

Talarico sees Christian nationalism as a form of tyranny, and dangerous because "the tyrant thinks he is on a mission from God." And, according to the author of the piece posted above from the Texas Baptist Standard, "an unhealthy merger of religious and American identities that seeks special privileges for Christianity."  That is somewhat of a "going back to the past" because Christianity once did receive special privileges because so many people in government were Christians.  

One of Talarico's remarks that really did catch my eye was his distinction of the support of Christians for Harris from that of Christians who support Trump.  Many Christians have tried to turn Trump into some messiah-like figure, or being referred to as "the chosen one."  And since the assassination attempt, many of them have claimed divine intervention was present to "save" Trump for this purpose of becoming President again.  If that was some kind of divine intervention, then they need to explain why God would have allowed the taking of the life of a 50 year old fireman in front of his children.  

"The key difference," said Talarico, "Is that we're not worshipping Kamala Harris.  We're just voting for her.  

The video of his sermon on Christian Nationalism and its dangers is worth watching and can be accessed here.

Christianity is a Faith, Not a Political Party 

The Republicans don't have a corner on the market when it comes to Christianity.  It is not "the Christian party" and anyone who claims that one can't be Christian when they follow the "godless, evil" Democrats is ignoring a mountain of licentious, godless evil among Republicans, and their idolization of one of the most godless, evil politicians we've ever seen in the United States.  Hypocrisy, indeed, knows no bounds, particularly among conservative, Evangelical Christians, many of their politically engaged pastors and churches, and among the Republican party.  

There's a huge difference in both the sincerity of one's Christian faith, and the depth of understanding of that faith as the constitutions first amendment freedom of conscience, and separation of church and state have set it free from the political corruption of the state to be whatever God calls it to be.  Jimmy Carter, more than any American politician that I can name, understood exactly what that meant, in terms of where the boundaries existed between his ability to do his job without compromising the values and beliefs of his very strong, conservative, Evangelical faith, and serving the American people without imposing religious restrictions that the government was forbidden to impose.  

The manner in which Kamala Harris, a Baptist with a "born again" testimony similar to those in that faith tradition, and Tim Walz, raised Catholic and converted to the Lutheran church when he got married, avoid using their faith as a tool to get votes, balancing their own convictions with their obligation as public servants to represent all Americans and not just those who share their values, and not using their political position as a post from which to peddle their faith, reminds me a lot of Carter.  

Christian conversions and adherence to principles that are the result of political influence, pressure, or legislation, are not sincere or authentic, and attempts by politicians to use their political office and the power that comes with it to command religious practice is tyranny.  The founders who made sure that freedom of conscience was a first amendment right, and that the establishment clause did away with a state sponsored church, understood that completely.  

American Evangelicals have fallen on some hard times over the past thirty years.  Membership and attendance in their churches is declining, and while they are loathe to admit it, much of it can be traced to the uptick in political engagement brought on by leaders like Jerry Falwell and the Moral Majority, and Pat Robertson and the Christian Coalition.  Time, resources and energy have gone into right wing politics, not evangelism, and as a result, the number of converts, especially among Gen X, the Millennial generation and now Gen Z, who have remained in church after they leave home is tiny.  

And preachers like Jack Graham and Landon Schott have caused a lot of conservative Evangelicals to become disconnected entirely from the values and virtues of the Christian gospel taught and lived out by Jesus and his Apostles.  Jesus said that one of the two greatest commandments was to "love your neighbor as yourself," and he used the example of a Samaritan, who was of a different race and ethnicity, and a different religion, despised and hated by his fellow Jews, to define the term "neighbor." In a modern context, that also means "evil Democrats," blacks, Latinos, Asians, gays, lesbians, transgendered persons, Muslims, Buddhists, Jews or Hottentots.  

Jesus also said if someone slaps your right cheek, turn the left one to them also.  He said to love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you might be called children of God.  But doing these things among the Evangelical community now will get labelled as being "woke."  By dismissing or ignoring these clear teachings of the Christian gospel, directly from Jesus himself, these so-called "Christian nationalists" have revealed themselves as intruders and imposters, as defined by the Apostle Jude for the first century church.  They're not "Christian" nationalists, they're white, racist nationalists, and their nationalism is based on the white race controlling the United States.  Christianity is just a convenient tool to use to get there.  

Republican Duplicity Stands Behind Project 2025

The Heritage Foundation claims that its aim "isn't on putting more power into the hands of government, it's on returning power to the people."  

But if you read through the 900-plus page Project 2025, which they were largely responsible for putting together in anticipation of helping Trump to return to the White House, you can easily see their aim is to put power into the hands of government in order to enforce a Christian nationalist agenda on the country.  It is to take power away from the people, and concentrate it in the hands of a few people who will enact the agenda that denigrates, excludes, persecutes and even executes people who don't fall in line with their agenda.  

The whole thing is a roadmap to a dictatorship.  That's the best thing that can be said about it.  It is an admission of failure on the part of political conservatives to attract enough of a following to enact the kind of legislation they want to pass without opposition.  Though the Heritage Foundation is not specifically an Evangelical Christian organization, but it is heavily influenced by far right wing extremist Evangelicals, it avoids direct identification as such so as not to limit its influence and specifically its ability to raise money.  

But there are plenty of far right wing Evangelicals in the Heritage Foundation's leadership and among its members.  It's pretty clear that they plan to segregate society by making pariahs out of, and persecuting the LGBTQ community as well as putting minorities, all non-whites including Hispanics, into a second-class citizen status ineligible to participate in government.  They want to create an oligarchy made up of white billionaires who run the country for their own benefit, and it would be along the lines of the dominion theology model, though it doesn't use that terminology.  It is codified white supremacist Christian Nationalism.  

Was Trump Surprised By This and is He Not Planning to Make This His Platform? 

Along with major tax cuts for billionaires, which means another increased tax burden for the middle class, which was exactly the pattern of the last Trump "tax cut," this is the foundation of Trumpism.  It's part of the "deal" he made in exchange for the support of Evangelical leadership and their votes.  So anything he and his campaign have said about distancing themselves from this plan is just another in a long string of Trump's lies.  

The evidence, mountains of it, not only suggests that Trump was involved in the formation of this draconian, anti-American, Constitution-destroying plan, it proves that the possibility of another Trump presidency was exactly what those who drafted this plan were counting on when they put it together, with his stamp of approval and his telling them he planned to start enacting it on day one.  That's one reason behind why they took the time and paid such attention to detail.  They've said as much, openly and it's as if the Heritage Foundation never heard Trump's denial of his intention to support Project 2025.  They know he's a duplicitous windbag.  He's assured them of his full support and then told them to pay no attention to his denials. He has to lie to get votes.

They were headed in this direction, discussing this with him, getting his ideas and approval of theirs, while he was in office the first time.  The only reason Trump has lied through his teeth about it and made them look stupid and extreme is that he discovered the American people would soundly reject this plan out of hand, and they would overwhelm the small percentage of core MAGA voters he has in his base with support for Biden, and now for Harris.  Like almost every other promise he made as a candidate for President, he has no intention of listening to any criticism on anything he's negotiated in order to get the votes of the religious extremists.  

This is an Idea That Has Been Tried Before, and Failed Miserably 

Ever since the Edict of Thessalonica under Emperor Theodosius in 380 A.D., Christian nationalism took the Christian church in its purest form and turned it into a state institution.  So we have about 1,700 years worth of examples of what happens to Christianity when it becomes a political institution, using political power to try to achieve its mission, baptizes converts by force, rather than by their own choice, and turns churches from gathered fellowships of believers into institutions.  

It ceases to be a church, and it becomes an institution which is manipulated and used because of the power that it has.  And at that point, by the definition and description given to it by the early Apostles, and by the words of Jesus himself, it is no longer Christian. Jesus never intended for the church to be a repeat of theocratic Israel.  He offered no covenant to any nation, and declared "my Kingdom is not of this world," which indicates the spiritually transcendent nature of the universal church.  

So the principles of any form of Christian Nationalism are unbiblical and pseudo-Christian.  

The irony here is that most of the conservative Evangelicals involved in the Heritage Foundation are harshly critical of the superficiality and lack of dedication and commitment to biblical fidelity of state churches, most notably the Roman Catholic Church, though they don't hold back on contempt for any mainline Protestant church that originated out of European national origins, and they despise the Eastern Orthodox Church.  

These far right wing religious conservatives completely ignore the biblical text, especially the very words of Jesus himself, when it comes to laying the groundwork for their takeover of the United States government.  They are willing to use violence against their enemies to achieve their purposes because they believe God is holding their coat-tails and cheering them on.  That makes them anti-Christian, if the perspective of the Apostolic authors of the New Testament are right about it.  

I heard a comment on a talk show yesterday that puts all of this in perspective.  Conservative Evangelicals claim to believe that the Bible is without error, and authoritative in all matters of Christian faith and practice.  They believe Jesus is the divine Son of God, the savior of humankind, and his interpretation of the gospel is completely accurate.  

Jesus told his followers, who were subjected to pagan, Roman rule over their own land, to "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven." [Matthew 5:44, NRSV]  

So if your church is helping you identify your enemies, instead of encouraging you to love them, then it's not a church and it's not Christian.  

Democrats, Let's Seize This Moment and Make It Work for Us! Do Something!

We got a shock in 2016 when, for just the fourth time in American history, fifth if the contingent election of 1824 is included, a majority of voters did not succeed in electing the President of the United States.  I must admit, I really thought that Trump would fade, as he always had done, after it became clear to the voters, even Republican voters, that he was a fake, a phony, a con artist, a grifter, and that he was in no way either an American patriot, nor a "God-fearing Christian."  But he succeeded in his deception of the Republican party, or his cheating in the primaries, which was alleged but not proven, and won the nomination, and then benefitted from the quirky electoral college to win the White House.  

As I expected it would be, his Presidency was a disaster.  He hung on by keeping his predecessor's economic policies in place at the Fed, living off the prosperous economy that was the work of eight difficult years under President Obama. He raised the taxes on the working class in a devious way, calling it a "tax cut" which only benefitted billionaires.  And his reckless and incompetent leadership during the pandemic caused the economy to crash and the death of more than a million Americans.    His only achievement, if you want to consider it so, was the appointment of three corrupt extremists to the Supreme Court, each one of whom told bald faced lies about their belief that Roe v. Wade was "settled law" and they would protect those rights if appointed. 

Birds of a feather.  Or, as my Mom used to say, "One liar to another is still a liar."  

We were shellshocked.  It took a while to recover from that disaster.  The day the news media finally declared Joe Biden as the President-elect in 2020 brought millions of Americans out into the streets in joyous celebration which was cut off by his illegal, seditious attempt to subvert the Constitution and fight against the peaceful transfer of power.  That should have disqualified him from ever running for public office again, and the fact that still hasn't happened baffles me as a law abiding and patriotic American who believes implicitly in the Constitution. 

Four Years and Another Joyous Celebration

We're being cautious, and I get that.  We are fighting against a media that is, for the most part, owned by and controlled by corporate interests who think they will benefit from a second Trump Presidency.  And let's be honest, we're giving inordinate attention and credibility to a plethora of polling data that is largely being interpreted, and in some cases manipulated, by the media that uses them to support their own contentions.  

Let's let that go for just a minute.  We just went on a political roller coaster ride of unprecedented proportions.  We went from three weeks of seeing the Democratic party split up into factions over whether or not the President should stop his campaign and let someone else "more electable" be the nominee, or whether he should stand firm and keep going.  And along with that, the ideas being floated around of a quick, "brokered convention," mini-primaries and the basic nullification of 15 million primary voters who followed the rules and supported their candidate, or whether there was a "next in line" candidate capable of beating Trump.  

I'm going to say this here because it needs to be said.  The fact that there's any doubt at all about whether or not Trump can be beaten is a sad, sad commentary on the state of American politics and evidence that we have some real hard work to do to clean up what is a gigantic mess and a disparity of wealth distribution that makes it seem impossible to clean it up.  That a man who, by all political standards, was an absolute failure at politics but continues to be supported by Republican leadership, who is an immoral, worldly, antichrist who continues to be supported by conservative Evangelicals who call themselves "Christian," can still be in a position to get enough votes out of our outdated election system to win the highest office in the country is a damning problem for this country that reveals an inherent weakness because we've failed in our responsibility to educate our electorate.  

OK, rant over. 

But what I want to celebrate, and where I want to focus attention, is on what has transpired from the moment President Biden ended his re-election campaign, and endorsed Kamala Harris.  The "brokered convention" talk died down almost immediately.  Almost overnight, the party coalesced around her potential candidacy.  There was a collective sigh of relief, and a collective burst of energy that has only increased in its scope.  If those polls we were so intently watching before the President ended his campaign were as accurate as some of us seem to believe, and we are looking at the data and the trends that have formed since then. we have seen an unprecedented political shift in this election campaign. 

There is no other campaign to which this one can be compared that bears any resemblance to the political transformation that has taken place.  I think the pressure from fear that Trump might actually be able to eke out the support through our undemocratic electoral college system to win the election without a majority again was released when the Democrats came up with a way to make a quick shift without disenfranchising their primary voters or sacrificing a year's worth of their campaign and field a candidate with competence, experience and intelligence far beyond what Trump can compete with, and win.  

Even those polls, skewed, tampered with, manipulated and uninformed as they may be, carry all kinds of signs pointing to a Democratic party win in November, not just for President, but way down the ballot into the Senate and House.  But the difference between where Harris is now, and where Biden was just four weeks ago, is significant and substantial.  She is well ahead of where Barack Obama was against Mitt Romney coming out of the party conventions in 2012, and where Hillary Clinton was coming out of the DNC in 2016.  

Maybe we need to notice some things the media wants us to slip passed without noticing.  Like the fact Trump has remained about the same place through all of this.  There was no "bounce" after the assassination attempt, and there's not a lot of clarity regarding public opinion indicating people think of it as more of an assassination attempt and less of a staged event.  There was no bounce after the Republican convention.  In fact, there hasn't been a bounce on that side of the polling data for quite some time.  On the graphs, the red line is pretty straight, and it has a very slight but visible angle on the down side.  

But I think our best course of action is to take our cues from the convention and its speakers, and experience the joy that radiated out from Chicago over the course of those four days.  Even here among those of us who live in the city, the mood was upbeat, in spite of the doom and gloom dire warnings of possible repeats of the 1968 convention, with police and protester clashes in the streets.  Protesters did show up, though not even in the numbers that they did in Milwaukee last month at the GOP.  It was hard for the media, who wanted so badly to focus on that aspect of this week, to get anything worth the attention they wanted to give it.  

Realizing that we do have fears and doubts generated by the sheer awfulness of Trump and the general attitude that because he's such a predictable scumbag, we just expect that kind of awfulness from him, if we get past that, what we see is that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are now the frontrunners in this election.  The convention bounce they are experiencing, actually acknowledged this morning, shockingly, on a major network's Sunday news program, has put them in a position similar to where Barack Obama found himself in 2008, and in a campaign that bears some similarities to the direction in which that one headed.  Even Nate Silver is saying that she is now favored to hit 287 electoral votes, with trends continuing upward.  

The approach taken by the campaign and the party, which was on display at the convention, is working.  Republicans, by their reactions, are telling us that this worked.  We need to come out of the shell just a  bit, enjoy the atmosphere, don't get overconfident, but help keep pushing this along because it is working!  

 

 

Right Wing Ridicule Aimed at Gus Walz Tells Us All We Need to Know About "Conservative Values"

"Truly I say to you, inasmuch as you have done it to the least of one of these, my brothers, you have done it unto me."  Jesus Christ, Matthew 25:40 

Those of you who read here regularly know that many of our posts are aimed at comparing and contrasting the Christian gospel, as defined by Jesus and the Apostles and authors of the New Testament, with the pseudo-Christian far right wing political movement that has captured and transformed much of conservative, Evangelical Christianity, turning it into an apostate cult.  Somewhere around half of the posts here follow this theme.  

We've assembled a mountain of evidence and observations to support this claim.  The affirmation of much of our readership, which has grown considerably, is proof that our message resonates with a group who feel the same way, and who feel their church experience and membership has been pulled out from underneath them by the intrusion of an antichrist and his message.  

Vindication of Our Contentions Came on Wednesday Night of the Democratic National Convention

One of the most moving moments of the DNC for me came on Wednesday evening during Governor Walz's acceptance speech, when he publicly declared that his wife and kids were the love and focus of his life, and his son, Gus, stood up, cried, and proudly pointed to his father, declaring his love for him and demonstrating his excitement over his being nominated for Vice President of the United States.  

I cried.  

There wasn't anything political in that moment at all.  The governor was introducing us all to his family and it was easy to see they were his pride and joy.  It was a spontaneous moment.  I've worked in education for my entire career, and I couldn't help but think what an honor for the Governor to have that simple, public moment of acknowledgement from his teenage son, and how many parents of teenagers I know who yearn for moments like that.  

Then Ann Coulter interjected herself into the moment with her now infamous remark on X.  And that was followed by a barrage of right wing Trumpers jumping on to the insulting, and frankly, evil, bandwagon of criticism.  I am still unable to express the anger and the emotion that has been there ever since.  I'm not one to burst forth with a string of f-bombs and curse words to express how I feel about something but when I saw a tic-toc video of a young reporter, Elizabeth Booker Houston, blasting Coulter for her cold-hearted, wicked, inexcusable remarks, all I could say was, "amen!"  

Coulter's cruelty was compounded by the fact that Gus Walz has a diagnosed nonverbal learning disorder, and ADHD.  Whether she knew that or not is irrelevant to the criticism.  What it shows us is that our criticisms of Coulter's callousness, lack of empathy or feeling, and inhumanity, are right on target.  She is a despicable human being and her representation of conservative Republicanism is a black mark on that entire political party.  

She deserved every word of the barrage of criticism that rained down on her and frankly, I hope this was the moment that ends her public career and makes her withdraw permanently from public view.  It's one thing to advocate for the politics of right wing Republicanism, but to do it in a way that demonstrates such a stunning lack of character, absent of any hint of humanity, is inexcusable.  

Of course, criticism of her attack came swiftly from Democrats.  But what tells us everything we need to know about just how despicable, immoral and lacking in any semblance of character Trump and his supporters are is their silence.  Trump should have been the very first person to smack down Coulter and put her in her place, disassociating himself from her despicable behavior and separating his campaign from this clearly and quickly.  Their silence tells us that they lack human character, a conscience and they are bottomless in their selfish ambition.  

Their silence disqualifies the legitimacy of Trump's pursuit of the Presidency.  We do stand for something in America, and clearly, neither he nor those he attracts, stand for anything.  

Do you get it now?  

Trump's Politics: Pseudo-Christian or anti-Christian?

The Atlantic: The Most Revealing Moment of a Trump Rally

Trump's takeover of the Republican party, and the blending of those right wing politics with conservative, Evangelicals have caused their departure from the biblical version of the Christian faith and have transformed Trump-supporting Evangelicals into pseudo-Christians.  They use the language, some of it anyway, and they give off an appearance of being Christian, but there is a lot of evidence which proves that most of them have given up their Christian faith to place their trust in something, or someone else other than Jesus Christ.  

The prayers,, given by pastors prior to Trump rallies, and written out for them, are a dead giveaway.  First, telling God that, from their perspective, the leaders of this country are evil, and "with every passing day, we slip farther and farther into George Orwell's tyrannical dystopia."  

If that is happening, it's not necessary to fill God in, that is, if you believe who the Bible says he is.  He'd know that and the sermon in the prayer, which is not directed at God, but at the audience, is the first clue that we're not dealing with someone who has an understanding of the Christian gospel, the Christian faith, or prayer.  

The prayer cited in The Atlantic link was a real shocker. No mention at all of the fact that Christians believe that only Jesus was sent to redeem and save, and that wasn't to redeem or save countries, it was to redeem and save people.  By any orthodox Christian doctrine and theology, this pastor's prayer, or political speech as it would better be described, is blasphemous.  And that doesn't include the fact that everything he said about Trump in the prayer was a lie.  

Politically Engaged Evangelicals Had a Choice Between The Holy Spirit and Political Power, and They Chose Politics

The turn of Evangelical leaders toward right wing, Republican politics, during the election of 1980, was an admission that their prayers were not being answered by God and they needed to take things into their own hands.  They did not like the fact that President Carter, who was perhaps the most visibly Evangelical President in modern American history, because he lived out his faith and wasn't a phony, and he respected the boundaries of the Constitution when it came to the separation of church and state.  They did not want the wall of separation to exist, they wanted to go back to a time when Protestant predominance gave their churches privileges which violated the first amendment, such as required prayer and Bible reading in public, government-funded schools, because they could.  

As their numbers declined, and their influence waned because of it, the turn to the GOP by Evangelical leadership was an attempt to continue to use the law to prevent church-state protections from being enforced.  The Roe v. Wade decision, making access to abortion a constitutionally protected right, in 1973, became the rallying point to register Evangelicals and get them to vote.  That was the beginning of a slippery slope into heretical apostasy, leading to the infiltration of churches with pseudo-Christian ideology and leaders who, as the Apostle Jude said, "were designated for this condemnation as ungodly," in his epistle written to warn early Christians of just such political intrusions.  

These people "pervert the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Lord and Master, Jesus Christ." [Jude v. 4] 

So every prayer at the beginning of a Trump rally, written to attribute Trump with savior and redeemer status, denies Jesus Christ and perverts grace into licentiousness.  

Trump Himself Rejects the Christian Gospel 

Trump denies one of the core essential doctrines of the Christian faith, when he publicly proclaims that he has done nothing in his life which requires God's forgiveness.  And he's essentially invented his own "god" whose character and power bear no resemblance to the descriptions of the Deity in the Bible.  But most politically engaged Evangelicals are either completely unaware of his repeated statements, or they are willing to pass them over and ignore them because it is more important for them to get what they want from Trump than from God.  Trump is their gateway into political power, which is exactly what they want, so they throw Jesus under the bus to get it.  

In his first epistle to the church, the Apostle John tells Christians to whom he is writing, many of whom were being persecuted by the Roman government at the time, not to believe every spirit but to "test the spirits to see if they are from God." 

Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God.  [emphasis mine]  And this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it was coming, and now it is already in the world. [I John 4:2-3, NRSV] 

In order to confess Jesus Christ, conviction of one's sin and acknowledgement before God of one's need for forgiveness must occur.  Trump's refusal to acknowledge this is a refusal to confess Jesus as Christ, which makes him, according to the apostle John, a follower of the "spirit of the antichrist."  And that makes any prayer which attempts to acknowledge him as "the only one" or an anointed one" when it comes to saving the country, whatever that means, a heretical blasphemy.  It's pseudo-Christian because it resembles the real thing, antichrist, because it places the redemption only brought by confessing Christ onto a false savior.  

The Evidence of Evangelical Heresy and Apostasy 

Christianity is a lifestyle that results from what Christians believe is a genuine spiritual transformation which occurs upon the confession of sin leading to confession of Jesus as the Christ.  It goes beyond mere intellectual assent to a set of doctrines and a specific theology of the nature of God.  Genuine transformation results in genuine change of character that is an observable change in the manner in which those who claim to be followers of Christ live their life.  

Jesus himself taught that the most important commandment, loving God with all one's heart, soul, mind and strength, was connected to, and demonstrated by "loving your neighbor as yourself."  And Jesus defined "neighbor" in a parable, known as "the Good Samaritan," in which "neighbor" was illustrated in the person of the Samaritan, a man from an ethnic background and religious sect despised and looked down on by the Jewish population.  The love to be extended to the neighbor was not conditioned upon the neighbor being of the same religion, race, ethnicity or even a citizen of the same political district or country, since Samaria and Judea were separate provinces under Roman rule at the time.  

So I have to ask this pointed question.  When we observe politically engaged Evangelicals, who are representing their faith and the Republican party, where do we see examples of their public obedience to this, one of the two commandments Jesus clarified as being "the greatest"?  

The Samaritan in the New Testament example could, in our day and age, be someone who is gay or lesbian, or transgender.  In Jesus' day, that's how Samaritans were treated by Jews, as pariahs.  I find nothing anywhere in the Bible that makes any exception to this commandment, which Jesus says is "like" the greatest one, meaning that it is just as important and that it is not possible to love God and not love one's neighbor unconditionally in the same way.  

I'm waiting.  

What True Christianity Actually Looks Like is Found in the New Testament

The Apostle Paul uses the analogy of bearing fruit to describe the virtues and values that are produced by people whose lives have been transformed  by Christian conversion.  These "fruits" include love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.  Against these things, says Paul, there is no law.  

Jesus himself gave examples of character traits and virtues that are part of the character of a follower of the Christian gospel and a member of his church.  These are found in a full list in Matthew 5:1-11 at the beginning of a three-chapter narrative that includes Jesus' most important teaching.  So in all of the denigration of political opponents, the lies, the ridicule, the false accusations and the hostility, where is genuine Christian practice reflecting the application of these character traits and values found in Trump Republicanism's approach to politics?   

That's a legitimate question, when considering the content of the prayers of some pastors at the beginning of Trump rallies.  And I'm not being judgmental here.  I'm simply pointing out observations of what people have said and done, and drawing conclusions.  There is nothing in the condemnation and the doom and gloom "judgment day is coming for the United States" rhetoric that bears any resemblance to the characteristics and lifestyle which Jesus and his apostles taught were the core values of Christian faith.  

There is no biblical evidence supporting the claim that God is going to bring judgment on a country based on the righteousness, or lack thereof, of its citizens.  Christians are not held accountable anywhere for the behavior of their neighbors, or the morality of their neighbors or the religious beliefs of their neighbors.  God made no covenant with the United States of America, which states that in exchange for our righteousness and our morality and our acknowledgement of his Godhood, we would in turn be blessed with prosperity and as long as we held to the standard, would not experience judgment.  Under the Christian covenant, judgment is reserved for individuals, not for countries or nations.  

And Jesus never said "love only your righteous, moral, Christian neighbor."  He said that one of the two greatest commandments, "and the second it like the first," equating them, was simply to "love your neighbor as yourself."  So hating your neighbor because they are Muslim or Mormon, and not Christian, because they are gay or lesbian, and not heterosexual, or because they have determined, for whatever reason within the realm of their own mind, that they were transgender, or because they were born in Mexico and not the United States, or they came here from Venezuela to escape political persecution that is as bad as anywhere in the world right now, is not being obedient to the greatest commandment.  

Do we get that?  

Most Evangelicals believe that there is an obligation, which accompanies loving one's neighbor, to "share the gospel" with them, leading to their conversion.  I have no problem with that, as long as it's not coercive, or takes advantage of the person's situation, and as long as that individual is receptive to it.  Christian doctrine also teaches that this is the responsibility of each individual, who is the only person accountable before a Holy God, to judgment.  Our nation is not subject to judgment and destruction by God based on the collective moral practices and behavior of its citizens or on whether or not elected representatives are Christians.  

There's no real difference between being pseudo-Christian or being anti-Christ.  My West Virginia-born mother had a saying that fits well here.  "You might as well eat the Devil as drink his broth."  

:

The Democratic Party Has Grabbed Complete Control of the Political Narrative With Unprecedented Authenticity

There's no question this 2024 edition of the Democratic National Convention is vastly different than just about any previous political convention put on by either party.  It almost defies description in political terms.  I've been trying to put my finger on exactly what it is that has made this so different, which has, on several occasions over the past three nights, brought me to tears, and which has been, in every single moment, so vastly different than the Republican convention, built around the personality and campaign of Trump.  

And last night, I think I finally figured it out.  The word is "authentic."  

We are watching real people, who have had real struggles in their life and political careers, and who have had real success, earned by determination and hard work, put everything on display by showing us who they really are, not who they want us to think that they are.  It's on display everywhere.  

There's been an incredible amount of talk about setting aside those things that tend to divide us when it comes to loving and caring about our neighbors, more than I've ever heard or seen in all of the time I spent growing up in an Evangelical church, and these people aren't just talking about it and wearing it on their sleeve.  These people have the goods to back it up.  

The candidates who are at the top of this ticket came from where we came from.  They're not some image crafted by prosperity they didn't achieve on their own and by the politics of duplicity and dishonesty because the real politician isn't someone who can relate to his own constituents.  They lived life where most of us have lived it.  I worked in a fast food restaurant most of the time I was in college, because my parents were covering tuition that my scholarships didn't quite cover, and that paid my car expenses, insurance and helped me have some savings.  I grew up in a small town where the football season was the highlight of the year, and where I had several teachers, including "that one," who were role models and encouragers.  I became a high school social studies teacher.  

Who better to understand politics, American history, culture, geography and economics?  

This Has Been Real

The kind of enthusiasm that has come out of this convention cannot be faked.  I think there's good reason for this.  

When the news came, almost a week after election day in 2020, that Joe Biden had won, and had been elected President, and Trump was out, the country was so relieved, people emerged from homes and businesses, and started celebrating. I was sitting on a love seat in my living room, and I cried.  The nightmare was over.  I had no idea what we were about to be put through, as some of the most unpatriotic, un-American activity we've ever seen was yet to be experienced, and when that ended with Joe Biden's inauguration, I cried again.  

The debate ramped up anxiety once again.  And raising the possibility that this orange scourge could wind up in the White House again, this time with a vengeance, prepared to overturn the Constitution and create a dictatorship, was the darkness, as Pete Buttigieg labelled it, that hung over the United States as the election approached.  

So what we're seeing in the Democratic National Convention, is genuine relief.  That's not to be critical to President Biden, who had the power to make this decision in his hands, and who did the right thing.  So did all the Democrats whose names were mentioned as possibilities for a brokered convention by simply agreeing with Biden's endorsement and stepping out, not to campaign for themselves or complain about the way it was done, but in support of Harris.  The unity we are seeing can't be faked.  The Republicans, by contrast, don't have it, tried to fake it at their convention and it didn't work.  

And along with having a candidate for President who is a person of character and conviction, who worked her way up to the success that she set for herself as a goal, and a candidate for Vice-President who is able to relate to just about every other American in this country, and who is what my parents would have called, "down to earth," we have a platform that has been crafted to make government work to meet the needs of the people.  

Motivation

There have been so many moments during this convention, which I have watched from my love seat in the living room though I would have loved to have been there in the building, which I pass almost every day on the way to work, that have brought me to tears, that have given me hope, and that have been joyous, as one of the most frequently used words this week have characterized.  I'm as working class as they come, with a small savings account, no pension, and dependent on social security for support when I retire.  I've lived paycheck to paycheck most of my life.  I've never asked for a hand out from the government, and have reluctantly taken the hand up as I get older and I need it.  

I'm not 100% aligned with every single position taken by this party.  And on some of the things on which I am aligned, I have my own idea regarding how to go about implementing them.  That's politics.  What I'm on board with is the direction they are going and how that will help make our constitutional democracy more secure and less susceptible to overthrow.  And I am on board with the candidates they have selected for office.  

I had thought, especially during all the chaos that was happening following the debate, that it might have been a better idea for the President to have made this decision a year ago, so that the party had time to go through a contested primary and come up with a candidate, but I don't think so now.  I think the President did the right thing, when he finally became convinced that things might not go as well as hoped, and avoided the chaos of a brokered convention by endorsing Harris.  And she could not have made a better pick for the VP candidacy than Tim Walz.  

I'm motivated not only to vote for this ticket, but to work for it and help it get elected.  I have the ability to serve in a battleground state close to home and I'm going to do it.  And I'm a pretty ordinary American if you look at who I am.  If I'm this motivated, a lot of other Americans might be motivated as well.  I believe we are going to win, and we're going to get control of both houses, and the big fight will be pushing to make people do their job and certify the votes.  

Centered on American Values

Loving your neighbor, taking the side of the disadvantaged and downtrodden, living life with and making joy contagious, are core values.  I would say to my Evangelical friends that it should be an embarrassment to them for these things to be so visible in the convention of a political party that most of them condemn because some of their positions support everyone's rights, and so invisible in their churches, and in the political party they claim is going to "make America great again."  

Pete Buttigieg said that the word which best describes what the other party is promoting is "darkness."  He's right.  That's visible from simple observation of virtually every word and phrase that comes out of their two candidates mouth.  Their response, especially to the events of this week, is not to come back on the issues, but to be critical, call names, express rage and get upset that no one is crowding into their rallies, or stuffing their bank accounts.  

I'd add the description, "morally bankrupt."  The criticisms of Gus Walz on social media, after his teary-eyed tribute to his Dad on the podium is evidence of the fact that these people do not have a shred of decency, morality or humanity.  Like Trump's well-publicized mockery of a disabled reporter during his first campaign, this is inexcusable, cruel and is a sign that these people should not be entrusted with any leadership anywhere in this country.  I don't care what the issues are, this is inexcusable, wrong and disqualifying to Trump.  

Good luck with that.  

It may be too much in the way of sounding like a cliche, but I think the Democrats seem to be working toward making America decent again.  And they've taken a big step forward in making America joyful again. 

Maybe Charlie Kirk Came to Learn Something About Joy, or Unity

Seeing that Charlie Kirk showed up at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago started me thinking about why it is that conservative Evangelical Christians are attracted to Republican politics and are either unwilling, or unable to see the almost complete incongruity between the Christian gospel found in the New Testament, and the Trump Republican Party.  When I prioritize my own personal convictions, and I determine to follow the words of Jesus, who said that the greatest commandment given by God is to "love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul and all your mind," and points out that the second greatest commandment is actually connected to that one, and that "loving your neighbor as yourself" is actually the means by which adherence to the first commandment is demonstrated, then I can only conclude that political extremism trumps [pardon the pub] the Christian gospel for people like Kirk. 

Kirk, by the way, is the founder of Turning Point USA, a political auxiliary to the Republican party, more specifically to the Trump branch of the Republican party, aimed at brainwashing younger voters in the MAGA agenda and attempting to get them activated to vote on that side of the political divide.  It depends heavily on politically engaged Evangelicals and has "re-establishing the church in the public square" as one of its aims. 

It was actually Don Jr., speaking at one of these rallies in Phoenix, who made the claim that the teachings of Jesus were no longer relevant to the place of the church in the world, claiming that the practice of his teaching to "turn the other cheek," specifically, was what was keeping the church from having influence in the public square.  That's a novel approach to Christian faith, I admit, along with considering the teachings of Jesus as being "woke" talking points.  

Maybe Charlie Kirk Can Learn Real Values from Being at the DNC

Maybe that's why Kirk decided to come to Chicago.  Aside from the chance to experience one of the greatest cities in America, he can learn something about the values he claims to want his political auxiliary to have.  In just two evening sessions of the Democratic National Convention, it has become very clear that those biblical, Christian gospel values that his group has determined are no longer relevant are found at the very core of everything the Democrats are doing.  

Democrats seem to be getting a much more favorable response to their approach than Kirk, Trump and the decimated GOP are getting.  He's certainly had plenty of opportunity to hear about real, down to earth values and how the Democratic party has implemented them and wants to continue.  The RNC was full of criticism, name calling, false accusations, outright lies, and a boring train of speakers all trying to do Donald Trump imitations, and failing at it.  In one night of the DNC, I heard the word "joy" or a form of it mentioned a dozen times, along with hope, peace, humility and unity.

He had the opportunity to learn all about the meaning of "love your neighbor as yourself" from several speakers, including the Reverend Rafael Warnock, also a United States Senator, who transitioned from political speech into Baptist preacher sermon before he finished.  We heard multiple examples of that virtue being put into practice as President Biden went down the list of his achievements and accomplishments in office, virtually every one of them based on considering the good outcome for one's neighbors.  And even though they've been out of office for eight years, now, the Obamas are still lazer focused on their message of hope and they have the goods to back it up.  

I saw a video clip of a conversation Kirk had with a young delegate from Georgia, who got the typical deflection one gets when discussing Trump's corrupt attempt to steal elections and empower fake electors, a deflection.  Kirk asked him, "What's a woman?"  The delegate responded, while walking off in frustration, "Why don't you meet one and find out."  

I'd have been more subtle.  

"A woman is a human being, created by God, who, in this room and in this party, unlike yours, is respected as an equal, empowered by her intellect and her creativity, balanced by her emotional strength and stability, capable and qualified to serve in the most powerful office in the world."  

I hope Charlie Kirk has some kind of epiphany while enjoying all that this great city has to offer.  Obviously, he spent his own money and showed up here because he is looking to fill in some big holes in values he currently does not understand or does not possess.  If he stays for the next couple of days, he's going to hear an awful lot about joy, about making peace, about loving his neighbor and using what he's been given to make a difference for everyone.  Above all, he's going to be in a place that was completely transformed by one of the most selfless acts demonstrating true patriotism and a love for one's country that we have ever seen from a President of the United States.  

Actions Speak Louder Than Words

Talk is easy and cheap.  I can hear those words coming out of both my mother and father's mouth when they were disappointed with a choice I made and wanted to provide some correction so I wouldn't repeat the mistake.  I always appreciated that.  It made a difference in my life. 

Think for a minute, in the speeches that have been made over the past couple of nights at the Democratic convention.  It's not difficult to discern what values are being practiced.  And frankly, there aren't any political cliches or stereotypes of politicians that accurately describe what is going on.  I grew up in an Evangelical Christian denomination and church, a fairly conservative one, and while the cultural insertion of biases and prejudices of the membership were part of the whole picture, I did listen.  

Jesus himself opens up his preaching with a description of a set of virtues known as the "beatitudes," which included characteristics he insisted were part of what he preached.  Being poor in spirit, or humble; mourning, or contrasting the world's idea of happiness with true happiness; the meek, who were humble and strong; those who hunger and thirst after righteousness; mercy; pure in heart; peacemakers and those persecuted because of righteousness are all marks of, or evidence of true Christian faith.  

In his epistle to the Galatians,  Paul lays down characteristics of Christian practice he called the "fruit" or product of the spirit.  They include love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.  He added, "There is no law against these things."  

In spite of the fact that Evangelical Christians are Trump's largest, and most loyal, constituency, I have to make this observation.  I see none of those virtues and values, at the heart of the Christian gospel, exhibited by his followers.  And I don't see a single one of these ever exhibited by Trump.  

Maybe, by coming to Chicago and showing up at the DNC, Charlie Kirk can see the truth, and it will set him free.         

One of the Greatest Presidents of My Lifetime

Joe Biden Will Go Down in History With the Greatest Presidents of All Time

The moments and events which turn good Presidents into great Presidents are rare.  There are circumstances which present themselves and which require good leaders rising to the occasion to provide decisive leadership that aims at preserving the individual freedoms provided by our constitutional democracy.  Lincoln saved the union by his leadership of the country during the Civil War.  Franklin Delano Roosevelt provided leadership through a social and economic reform that saved the country from its worst economic depression and then, from the worst threat to its sovereignty following the Pearl Harbor attack, during the Second World War.  

Sometimes, it is not until after something happens that history recognizes the leaders who were responsible for the accomplishment, and when their leadership becomes recognized as significant and successful in a historic moment.  John Quincy Adams, who happens to be my personal favorite, was elected as the result of the first and only "contingent" election in American history, and, in spite of his vision for the use of America's vast resources in developing the country's infrastructure, which, while it didn't occur during his term in office, happened immediately afterward.  Adams was also visionary with regard to his social agenda, especially his views on race, which were quite advanced for his time. 

But the recognition that President Joe Biden deserves started with the reception he received last night at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.  An ovation of appreciation, lasting over four minutes, punctuated with chants of "Thank you Joe," from a crowd jammed into the United Center, got it started.  Then, what we heard from the President over the next 45 minutes was a list of his achievements and accomplishments as President.  It was a long list, almost everything he set out to do while serving as President.  And everything he did was something which benefitted the people of the United States in some way.  Everything.  

What makes it remarkable, and which will elevate him to the status of one of our greatest Presidents will be the circumstances occurring at the time he was elected to office.  He came to power in the middle of a viral pandemic that was serious enough to take the lives of over a million Americans.  Beyond that, it was devastating the economy, shuttering schools and businesses, cutting off supply lines, stretching the resources and capacities of health care systems across the country, affecting everyone and everything.  Up to his inauguration, almost nothing had been done by his predecessor, who intended to ignore the crisis and let it run its course.  

He proclaimed it as a "hoax."  

An Honorable Career in Politics as a Public Servant

There is absolutely nothing wrong with pursuing a career in public service.  As an educator myself, I clearly understand the sacrifice of working in a career field which supports and undergirds just about every other aspect of our society, including its business and industry.  Without a productive, effective system of education, those things would not exist.  Nor would they be able to prosper and thrive without effective government leadership, in our case, in a constitutional democracy, providing infrastructure, security, and an effective labor force.  

Those who are critical of politicians like Joe Biden, who spent 50 years in politics, are showing their ignorance and don't know what they are talking about.  President Biden has made government work on behalf of its people.  He has a 50 year record of doing so.  There are few people in politics today who can say that, or who have done it as well as Joe Biden.  In the time he has served in the Senate and in the Executive Branch, he has learned how to make government work on behalf of the people.  And he's succeeded at it.  

It took fifty minutes last night for him to outline and address the success he has had as President during one term in office, much of that happening prior to the Republican house disarray that has occurred under the incompetence of the two Speakers they've selected since they  discovered they cannot govern.  All of that, and what it has been aimed at achieving for the people, has been the result of his experience and effectiveness as a politician.  And it made him a good President, an excellent President in comparison to all of those who have served since Franklin D. Roosevelt.  

What Makes Him Great

Everything he did as President during this term not only earned for him the right to run again as his party's nominee, it earned him the right to be re-elected.  He did everything he promised he would do.  We've recovered from COVID in much better shape than many other places in the world because of his leadership of the country and the use of its resources.  

Considering who and what he is running against, I remain unconvinced that he would have lost this election to Trump.  Seeing how things are going on the other side, knowing all of the baggage that travels with that candidate, I think Biden would have pulled out a victory in spite of his age and what appeared to be a lack of enthusiasm surrounding his campaign.  His opponent is sinking his own boat and doesn't know it.  

It was his decision to make.  And unlike his opponent, who thinks of himself as everyone else's savior and being the only one who can fix anything, this President listens to and takes advice.  This was a huge decision.  He had earned the nomination with his record, and deserved a second term.  But he was more committed to what was best for the country, and he's known, for a while now, that his age would be an issue if he chose to run again.  He put the country first, and removed what he was convinced was the biggest obstacle to his own re-election.  

It's only been the greatest of our leaders who have ever demonstrated that kind of self sacrifice.  

Joe Biden is a politician who has always claimed to have the best interests of the people in mind as the motivation for his public service.  And so he has.  

The Democratic Party has been blessed with Presidents who are talented, gifted leaders.  There is no one I can think of who has served since FDR who was not an excellent leader and a good President.  So it is not surprising that one of our veteran public servants, who did not get to sit behind the Resolute Desk until late in his political career, has turned out to be the greatest President of my lifetime.

Thank you, Joe!  

Not All White Evangelical Christians Are Trump Supporters or Republicans

Billy Graham's Granddaughter Joins "Evangelicals for Harris"

It's become a matter of course for white, Evangelical Christians in the United States to equate being Evangelical with being Republican.  I first heard that rhetoric in college, just before the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan.  Prior to that election cycle, most white Evangelicals were already Republican, largely because of their anti-abortion position, and because white, Evangelical Christian churches were one of the last bastions of bigotry and segregation in the country, something that existed just below the surface of Republican politics.  

President Jimmy Carter was in the White House at the time.  Carter never wore his Evangelical faith on his sleeve, or used it as a club to beat people over the head and demand that they listen to him, and he had such respect for the constitutional guarantee of a free conscience that set the church free to follow its conscience that he would not use his own Christian beliefs as a way to coerce others into sharing the same opinion.  And that meant that he would not take any steps to appoint judges to overturn the Roe versus Wade decision. His greatest foreign policy decision was to negotiate the Camp David Accords, between Israel and Egypt, ending decades of war between the two countries.  That angered some of the big shots who were self-proclaimed leaders among conservative Evangelicals.  

So, as the election approached in 1980, several of these leaders, most notably Jerry Falwell, pastor of the giant Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Virginia and weekly television preacher for "The Old Time Gospel Hour," and a Baptist evangelist by the name of James Robison, who preached revivals in Baptist churches, decided to see if they couldn't push the number of voting Evangelicals up to new heights while at the same time using their influence to endorse Ronald Reagan.  

Personally, I believe this was the tipping point, when Evangelicals, who claimed that American society was becoming increasingly secular, as "blue laws" vanished, Sunday became another day on the calendar to enjoy the weekend, and the country was "straying away from God, toward his wrathful judgment," decided to turn to secular politics to enforce their social agenda. I heard that from the pulpit of the church in which I grew up, more than once.  Unable to admit that it might be their own way of doing things, and their own approach to Christian faith that communicated a lack of relevance in people's lives, they decided to wage the culture war in the political arena.  

So they endorsed a completely secular, unchurched, non-Christian follower of the New Age movement, a former "B" actor from the Hollywood film industry, the institution on which they placed the most blame for America's drift away from God and into secular humanism, over a lifelong, "born again," Georgia Southern Baptist who was, out of all of those who had served in the White House up to that time, the most sincere, faithful, openly practicing Christian since the constitution was ratified.  

And it has gone downhill from there.  

Christianity Has Been Hijacked by Right Wing Trump Extremism  

There is no doubt about it, conservative, Evangelical Christianity in America has been hijacked by right wing extremist politics.  What made Falwell and Robison, along with Pat Robertson, a televangelist whose program, The 700 Club, mimicked television news, angry at President Carter and pushed them to the GOP was his perspective on abortion rights.  They wanted all Christians to accept their interpretation and ideology when it came to this specific social issue.  

Former President Jimmy Carter provides perhaps the single best example of an Evangelical Christian who served in the White House who was able not only to balance differences between his personal convictions and a political perspective that recognized the rights of all citizens, but which advocated and promoted Christian values in issues such as racial discrimination, women's rights and social justice reforms that are consistent with the core values of the Christian gospel preached and taught by Jesus and his apostles. 

Carter was personally opposed to any kind of abortion, for any reason, but he did not oppose it politically, because he saw that a majority of Americans did not hold the belief that life began at conception, that it was a religious belief entirely, and even though it was not something he would approve or advise, Americans who did not hold similar religious beliefs had the right to access something they themselves did not see as wrong for the culture and nation.  

It is, in fact, a religious liberty issue as the concepts and beliefs which have led to a determination that life begins at conception are of an exclusively religious perspective, and when applied as restrictions on abortion rights, constitutes an "establishment" of religion, which is unconstitutional.  Evangelicals, however, are not inclined to consider the rights of non-Christians in a constitutional democracy as equal, or of Christians who hold a different perspective, and for whom a candidate's position on abortion is not the only qualification for their vote.    

The intrusion of right wing politics into Evangelical churches and denomination has brought about a revival of the ideology of Christian nationalism, which started radicalizing conservative Christians back in the 1980's, and which now has become the predominant political perspective of a majority of conservative, Evangelical Christians.  Trump has simply turned the art of trading political favors to Christian nationalists as a matter of political course.  And in exchange for their votes, they have been quite willing to give up not only their core theological and doctrinal beliefs and practices, but their integrity and their morality, on which the credibility of their faith is built.  

When the principles and values of the Christian gospel, drawn from the biblical text, are laid out and promoted, most conservative Christians dismiss them as "liberal talking points."  Gone are the claims from conservative Evangelical leaders that "character matters most" when choosing who to vote for as a Christian in a constitutional democracy.  Those standards were reserved only for Bill Clinton when he was running for President and when adultery, or the hint of adultery, and lying to cover it up, were virtually unforgiveable sins as far as right wing conservative Christians were concerned.  They have become hypocrites in not applying those same standards to Trump, who has made a point of denying anything resembling a conversion experience to Christianity, insisting he has done nothing for which he must ask God's forgiveness.  

They have also become hypocrites in their complete abandonment of the core values of the Christian gospel in order to gain political power by riding on Trump's coattails.  Doctrine and the interpretation of the Bible has changed to accommodate the justification of behavior and activity that is decidedly un-Christian and un-patriotic on the part of Trump-supporting Evangelicals.  

There is a Biblical Warning About Such Political Intrusions Into the Church

Jude, who was one of Jesus' twelve apostles, and who was very likely the son of Joseph and Mary, making him a half-brother of Jesus, wrote an epistle to the church about the danger of philosophical intrusions into the Christian community of the church that had the potential to change their doctrine and alter their practice in a way that led to apostasy.  Jude's words are not a direct prophecy referring to what is happening to conservative Evangelicals who have embraced the heresy of Trumpism, but they are definitely a prophetic warning and an accurate description of what is now occurring among American conservative Evangelical churches. 

"For certain intruders have stolen in among you, he writes, "people who long ago were designated for this condemnation as ungodly, who pervert the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ."  [Jude v. 4] 

We've seen this perversion, not only in Evangelical leadership ignoring Trump's immoral lifestyle, his perpetual, pathological lying, and his open denial of the Christian conversion experience in favor of his own view of who God is, but in the fact that many Christians have made Trump into an idol of their worship, according characteristics to him that he doesn't exhibit, and making him the object of their loyalty in a false and deceptive way.  Trumpism has also brought about a definite perversion of the Christian gospel, openly proclaiming that principles which Jesus taught as the core beliefs of the Christian faith, such as turning the other cheek, "have gotten us nowhere," according to one of his surrogates, Donald Trump Jr., at a Turning Point rally in Arizona last spring.  

Jesus never intended for the church to be supported by a political state, in which all of the leaders adhered to the Christian gospel and conversion was required for citizenship.  Much of the history of the Christian church, from about 300 A.D. right up to the American Revolution, is of the repeated failed attempts of the church to establish itself in the same way that ancient Israel did in the Old Testament, as a covenant theocracy.  Not only is there not one jot or tittle of scripture to support this idea, but we have more than ten centuries of brutal bloodshed and war that testify to the fact it was the wrong thing to do.  

So it is quite encouraging to see groups forming, like "Evangelicals for Harris."  It is a demonstration of true democracy, and it shows that it is possible for people to disagree on some social issues, and on some interpretations of the Bible, and still give reasonable discernment to their choice of a candidate for office.  Personally, I find it easier to support a candidate like Harris, who is working to protect rights that are in danger, and boost the economic prosperity of Americans, than Trump, whose main talking point involves giving tax breaks to billionaires, and who keeps lying about the 2020 election he lost, and who, by his own bad choices and foolish behavior, has managed to be indicted for over 80 felonies and convicted, so far, of 34.  

It's hard for me to see how someone who understands, and practices, the values of the Christian gospel, could ever support, and vote, for someone like Donald Trump, or J. D. Vance.

Dear Pastor: I'm Very Sorry to Hear You're Voting for Trump

After seeing a former pastor make a social media post of the reasons he was supporting Trump, which included an attempt to make Trump's immorality and worldliness irrelevant to his decision, I decided to respond.  This is the kind of thing that is happening all through conservative, Evangelical churches in this country, and is the most relevant explanation for the membership and attendance loss they have experienced since 2016.  

Dear Pastor,

I saw your social media post, the one where you listed the reasons you were voting for Trump.  I was extremely disappointed that you chose to put your political opinion over your credibility as a pastor and preacher, and endorse a candidate, any candidate, for office.  I recall that in previous elections, you told your congregation that the church was not a "political action committee" and that it was important to put the preaching of the gospel in a place where secular politics of much lesser importance would not distract from its message or interfere with its proclamation.  

The fact that your position has changed in order to support this particular Presidential candidate is especially disappointing.  By choosing sides, you have now placed yourself in opposition to those members of your congregation who, by their own choice and conviction, have chosen not to support Trump and you have challenged their spiritual convictions and the prayerful consideration with which they came to their decision.  You hold a position of spiritual leadership in this congregation, entrusted to you by all of its members, not just those who are Republicans or who support one specific candidate.  There is no authority given to you, either by the congregation or in the scripture, which permits you to make this kind of judgment.  

Clearly, you have not considered the many reasons, including reasons rooted in the truth of the scripture which you claim to believe, and preach every week, those of us who are not voting for Trump have considered and from which we have drawn our own conclusions.  And you have assumed that those in the church who aren't supporting Trump can be easily persuaded to do so, since that would be, as you hinted at, the "Christian" thing to do.  

Personally, though you never asked, but chose to put yours out on social media, here are my reasons for not supporting or voting for Trump.  

• I cannot, in good conscience, seasoned by my years of being Christian, and of being instructed in the principles of the Christian gospel in church, trust or support a politician in the leadership of our country who has openly cheated on three different wives with multiple women, who put them publicly through that shame, using the media to justify his reasons for having affairs with other women, and who subsequently married the "other" women with whom he committed adultery.  The most recent humiliation of his current wife, during her pregnancy and the infancy of their son, with a porn star, makes it clear that this man doesn't have a shred of respect for the truth.  He's not qualified for any public office. 
• As the Christian gospel makes clear, experiencing conviction for our sin, desiring forgiveness, repentance, and placing trust in Jesus' sacrifice for our sin is the Christian gospel's path to restoration and reconciliation with God.  But this man openly denies that he needs to ask God for forgiveness for anything, and the god he proclaims to believe in is more like a Santa Claus in the sky, bestowing financial prosperity on those who claim it.  So I take it that you no longer condemn the prosperity gospel cult that loves and worships money, since you are supporting someone for President who believes in it and claims a prosperity gospel prophetess as his "spiritual leader"?  
• I understand that Trump has been a useful tool in achieving the political goals of overturning the Roe v. Wade decision, though his conviction on abortion, which is to let states decide whether they want it or not, is not consistent at all with your desire to see it banned across the country, or with your belief that it is evil. That's kind of hypocritical, as is the fact that I've never seen this church actually reach out to anyone in the kind of circumstances and situations that tend to be the cause of most abortions.  We've had several members of our own church find themselves in difficulties as a result of an unexpected pregnancy and the response has been to condemn their mistake and sit in judgment over their sexual immorality, resulting in their feeling pushed out the door by the people they depended on to love them the most.  And that, to me, nullifies our attempts at using political influence to achieve something that we possess the spiritual power to achieve.  Or so you've preached from the pulpit.  
• I was around, and I was observant during Trump's first term in office.  Regardless of the issues and the sides that are taken by different political parties, Americans have to be able to trust the words of their President.  Our national security depends on it.  The ability of the government to serve its people depend on it.  Trump is a proven, pathological liar.  He has manipulated and used the power of his office for his own personal benefit, and that of his close families and the financial interests of the billionaires who are finally his friends, and he has lied over and over again to protect his ability to use this power.  
• I cannot vote to support anyone running for office who does not respect the constitution and understand the limits it places on government power.  Trump incited an insurrection, based on the lie that the election was "stolen" from him, and attempted to solicit support from his followers to violently overthrow the government and put himself in the executive office.  Such a rebellion, without a legitimate cause, goes against the words of two of the great, early church Apostles, Peter and Paul, recorded in I Peter 2:13-17 and Romans 13:1-7.  
• I cannot support a candidate for public office who has turned his entire campaign into an act of denigration of political opponents who simply disagree with his politics.  The Bible says that fresh water and salt water cannot come from the same spring, and the personal denigration, name calling, accusations and character assassination that is a much bigger part of Trump's campaign than anything he has to say about the issues is the sign of an unrepentant, worldly heart, and a mark of his complete inability to be an effective leader.  It's also an indicator of his character, or should I say, lack of it. 
• I cannot support a candidate who is a convicted felon, tried by a jury of his peers based on the evidence.  It is not possible to claim to believe in "law and order" and then fail to accept the outcome of a fair trial or the consequences of the crimes that were committed.   

Hatred and bigotry radiate from Trump's campaign.  Don Trump Jr. made the point, at a Turning Point rally in Phoenix last year, that Jesus' teaching on turning the other cheek wasn't getting them anywhere in this world.  That statement was made to cheers of a crowd gathered for the rally inside an Assembly of God church auditorium.  Russell Moore, the editor of Christianity Today, reports that members of churches are coming up to pastors, after they've preached on the Sermon on the Mount, asking them, "Where did you get those liberal talking points?"  There's plenty of evidence that Trump and his political, right wing MAGA base have infiltrated the church and are quickly replacing the Christian gospel with one of their own that uses hatred, bigotry and even violence to get its way.  

The Apostle Jude provides us with a prophetic warning about those who will intrude into the church, bearing falsehood and licentiousness.  He says these intruders "walk in the way of Cain and abandon themselves for the sake of gain to Balaam's error, and perish in Korah's rebellion."  He calls them "hidden reefs at your love fests, waterless clouds swept along by the winds, fruitless trees in late autumn, twice dead, uprooted; wild waves of the sea, casting up the foam of their own shame; wandering stars for whom the gloom of utter darkness has been reserved forever."

I know you are familiar with the epistle of First John.  I'm not a Christian nationalist, and I don't believe, as a Christian who has been given the responsibility of voting to choose the leadership of a constitutional democracy, that the leaders I choose must walk in lock step conformity with my religious beliefs and values, or my personal convictions, in order to earn my vote.  But I will not, in good conscience, vote for anyone who trashes my religious beliefs or my values by elevating himself to some kind of godhood in order to excuse inexcusable behavior. 

Trump has openly proclaimed that he has not done anything in his life for which he must ask God's forgiveness.  He has stated that he has his own perception of who god is.  As far as I am concerned, he's as free to make that kind of declaration as I am to deny it.  But, as you well know, that statement is a denial of the Christian gospel, a blasphemy of the conviction of the Holy Spirit, and a denial of Christ's messiahship.  I John 1:1-3 addresses this, and assigns a title to the one who does it.  You know exactly what that is.  

Pastors can have their own political opinions, and can vote for whomever they choose, as do you.  But in their stewardship responsibility of the local church, they are also responsible to guard their congregation from intruders, as the Apostle Jude warned in his epistle.  It is false teaching to claim that one partisan political party's perspective is "Christian."  And this particular individual is clearly, in every way, a pagan intruder into a church which he has used for his own purposes and to which he has introduced a gospel that has replaced the Christian gospel.  You could support whomever you choose and still maintain the integrity of the office by keeping those views to yourself, separate from your ministry stewardship, but you chose to open the door to this licentious intrusion into the church [see Jude v.4] by publicly displaying your political preferences.  

You have ignored the warning of the Apostle and failed to protect this church from this intrusion of "licentiousness," in the form of extremism in right wing politics. You've given in to the temptation to use your influence and position as a pastor to support a secular politician who does not reflect its values or respect it for what it is, in exchange for the political power he provides on a few issues of interest to you.

I was an active, supportive, serving member of your congregation for eight years.  I submitted to your leadership, was encouraged and motivated by your preaching, respected your theological and doctrinal interpretations of the Bible and supported your ministry.  This social media post has undermined all of that.  Had you kept your political opinion to yourself, along with the freedom to vote for whomever you choose, as a matter of good stewardship of your pastorate of the church, nothing would have changed.  Your political perspective is irrelevant to your ministry, so your revelation of it via a public social media platform has prioritized it over your ministry, and undermined your credibility, and my trust of pastors.